C Pita Profile picture
10 Apr, 11 tweets, 4 min read
Let's unpack Dr. Conly on the Precautionary Principle.

Q: Why weren't HCW provided N95s, given the advanced warning that SARS2 might be Airborne?

Conly: "I need to see a much higher level of evidence..."
(🤔 That's not how the Precautionary Principle works)

🧵 1/
He then makes a pretty bold claim:

"certainly from our experience in Alberta, in Phase 1" the HCWs wore "gowns, gloves, medical masks"... and "not a single HCW transmission"... despite "highly infectious, hot viral patients"

*Phase 1* is defined here: MARCH-APRIL 2020

2/
So why the "Phase 1" qualifier? Why is he using evidence from a 1 to 2 month period that was over a year ago, and extrapolating out to "8 months of continuous contact time", rather than just telling us what happened during the past year?

Oh... crap..

3/

calgaryherald.com/news/staff-at-…
So in April 2020, there were at least 6 staff members in the Maternity Ward of Conly’s hospital that contracted COVID.

Gee.. what happens in the Maternity ward? Any heavy breathing, yelling or other aerosol generating activities happening there??

4/
"Just a blip" he said, sometimes there is "slippage".

Oops.. looks like there was some more "slippage" in September:

5/

globalnews.ca/news/7356957/c…
In the September Outbreak, at least 12 staff were infected, as well as 17 patients, including 3 deaths 😔.

How did it happen? Well according to Dr. Conly, it is "very complex".

Agreed.. explaining Airborne outbreaks via fomite hoop-jumping would certainly be complex.

6/
Well surely they learned from their mistakes and addressed the "slippage"?

Nope, as of Feb 2020, 47 patients, five visitors and 43 health-care workers were infected. Twelve patients died.

Read through the article for the laundry list of excuses.

7/

calgaryherald.com/news/local-new…
So what is Dr. Conly's explanation for these continuous lapses?

Listen for yourself...

"we have since had some hospital acquired transmission"..
"but when we've done anonymous surveys, we found they were not following the guidelines and recommendations"

ie.. Victim Blaming

8/
In summary, HCWs have been battling an Airborne virus with Droplet Precautions.

When people inevitably got sick and died, the Director of IPAC blamed the HCWs for not following the guidelines. He took zero accountability and made zero adjustments.

Stunning...

end/
Thanks to @akm5376 for the clips.
Typo... *Feb 2021

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C Pita

C Pita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CPita3

11 Apr
Is Airborne transmission an important and mitigable aspect of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

✅ YES - here's a 🧵 summarizing the evidence from @kprather88's presentation.

1/

events.ucalgary.ca/obrien/#!view/…
As Dr. Conly reminded us on Friday, when considering Airborne Transmission, "it's very important to take into consideration the very very complex environment".... "direction of airflow, the number of air changes, temperature, relative humidity... its veeery very complex"

2/
This is actually NOT "complex" for Aerosol scientists, mechanical engineers, building scientists, and other experts in fluid mechanics. Due to the Pandemic, these experts have diverted their brainpower to this problem. See summary of studies below.

3/ Image
Read 15 tweets
9 Apr
The acne is getting the most laughs (including from me), but the others are legit anti-masker talking points.

This is a crisis folks.. we have anti-maskers in charge at WHO.
This isn't an exaggeration.. just read through this 🔥🗑. Written on behalf of the WHO IPAC committee, and Dr. Conly defended these points today.

aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
Read 4 tweets
9 Apr
Great thread for those asking "why is this even a debate?" or "isn't this just semantics?"
Re. "Is this really a debate?". Watch this video for yourself...

While this is from July 2020... so far there has been no public movement from Dr. Conly or the WHO IPAC committee on this issue. If anything they have dug-in their heels further.

Read 4 tweets
30 Jan
Just want to clarify that it's likely the Mother was the Index case. Child tested negative at the hospital. Mother was asymptomatic but developed symptoms 2 days after discharge, tested positive on day 4. Child tested positive on day 6.
Another key quote:

"As some of the report's authors were taking part in the medical round and got infected, we can declare there was full compliance with PPE guidelines."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!