Andrei Illarionov "Why Biden's phone call has increased the risk of another Putin offensive". My translation (with some cuts). Part I.
Perhaps dear readers you may not have noticed it yet, but astute political analysts (henceforth known as APA), who had previously announced the beginning of a “new cold war” by the “second Churchill”, have now have announced
the end of the more than seven year Russian-Ukrainian war, and as a result : " On April 2, 2021, the Russian-Ukrainian war ended in an unconditional political defeat for the Russian Federation."
The APA became so optimistic because of a phone call from Joe Biden to Vladimir Zelensky. The picture of events drawn by the APA reminds one of the Gogol police chief
who convinced his listeners of the magical properties of just of the police captain's cap: the captain doesn’t even need to go himself but just sends someone with his cap and this cap alone will drive the peasants back to their homes.
(My note: this happens in “Dead Souls”, when the landowners from whom Chichikov was trying to buy dead peasants - became worried that due to their large number they might rebel.)
That is, if a couple of centuries ago the Novorossiya police captain had to send at least his cap, today’s the "world’s police captain" does not even need to do that - one call from Mr. Biden will drive the Russian troops back to the very place of their permanent deployment.
More precisely: “will not drive”, but “has already driven out” since “the Russia-Ukraine war ended on April 2, 2021”.
The attack of optimistic enthusiasm that has engulfed a part of the political analytic audience, caused by Biden's cap, is understandable. But after the emotions subside a little, it would be good to try to calmly figure out what actually happened, and what to expect next.
And for this it is useful to answer several interrelated questions:
- Does Putin have military plans for Ukraine? And what are they?
- Is Putin ready for an attack today? And what are the most likely dates for the resumption of large-scale hostilities?
- What should Biden have done if he really wanted to protect Ukraine?
- What did Biden actually do? And what is he doing now?
- What did Biden's call reveal about his attitude to Ukraine?

(To be continued).
Part II (I have skipped some fragments to make it shorter but its still very long).
1. Does Putin have military plans for Ukraine? And what are they?
Yes, he has. Both he and his entourage (most recently - D. Kozak) talked about them more than once, and have also demonstrated their seriousness by their actions. Among the goals of military operations
(ranked according to the degree of desirability and feasibility), one can name at least the following:
1. Establishing control over the entire North Crimean Canal from Perekop to Tavriisk and Novaya Kakhovka;
2. Establishing control over the entire continental part of Taurida from the mouth of the Dnieper in the west to Vasilyevka and Orekhov in the north and Berdyansk in the east - for example, within the borders of the former Taurida province
3. Establishment of a land corridor between occupied Crimea, the continental part of Taurida and the occupied parts of Donbass;
4. Establishment of a land corridor between continental Taurida and Transnistria
2. Is Putin ready for an attack today? And what is the most likely timing of his attack?
Publicly available information indicates that Putin is not currently planning a large-scale offensive operation. There are several pieces of evidence for this.
1. The number of Russian troops concentrated on the Russian-Ukrainian border (28 battalion-tactical groups, or about 20-25 thousand people), announced by the Chief of the General Staff of Ukraine R. Khomchak, is insufficient for a major offensive operation.
Khomchak's expected increase in this grouping by another 25 BTGs, that is, about doubling the number of Russian troops, will allow them to start the first operation on the above list
(to establish control over the channel of the North Crimean Canal and capture Tavriisk and Novaya Kakhovka), but accumulation of necessary forces will require more time.
2. Everything that is known about how Putin prepares his offensives suggests that, if his intentions are serious, he conducts the concentration of troops aimed at the attack as secretly as possible.
This is how the aggression against Georgia in August 2008, the occupation of Crimea, military operations near Zelenopol and Ilovaisk, and the transfer of the Buk-M1 air defense system in 2014 were prepared.
In the few cases where the movement and accumulation of Russian troops in recent years has taken place in public (one might say: demonstratively), large-scale hostilities have not followed - Putin was bluffing.
The flow of information from numerous observers about movement of unmasked military equipment, mostly in the daytime, including through populated areas, indicates more of a deliberate Putin demonstration than of preparation for an actual offensive. At least in the near future.
3. The most important factor determining the possible start of large-scale hostilities by Putin is the schedule for the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
The completion and launch of the pipeline changes (worsens) Ukraine's geopolitical position so radically that Putin will not risk an unlikely, but still possible, response from the United States and Europe while construction is still ongoing.
Last year, 2020, the pumping of Russian gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system amounted to 55.8 billion cubic meters.
After the full completion of the construction of the Turkish Stream, gas transit through Ukraine to Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey switched to new gas pipelines, and the completion of extensions to Serbia and Hungary will reduce gas transit through Ukraine by 10-12 billion m3 annually.
Since the capacity of the first string of the NS2 gas pipeline is 55 billion cubic meters of gas, its commissioning means an almost complete cessation of the pumping of Russian gas through the GTS, and, consequently, a radical loss of Europe's interest in ensuring the security
of Ukraine. Putin will certainly not rush to launch a large-scale offensive until construction and launch of SP2 is complete and will try to get the most out of his possible attack in ideal geopolitical conditions.
3. What should Biden have done if he really wanted to help Ukraine?
(To be continued).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

11 Apr
So here is Latynina's view on things. And, I have to say, I find it the most convincing of all.
Yes, these are demonstrative actions, it is important to emphasize, because all this happens in the daytime, without any disguise. But we must understand that if the demonstration does not have an effect, then it can get out of control.
And, of course, we also must not forget Russian propagandists who tell us about an innocent baby which was killed by “Ukrainian fascists” for ritual purposes, by using a drone.
Read 34 tweets
10 Apr
The first Western book on WWII on the Eastern Front worthy of the name, that is, one that doesn’t (at least in a large degree) parrot Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda (especially the lies contained in the so called “memoirs” of Soviet marshals (the very worst liar being Zhukov) Image
and does rely on new documents uncovered in Soviet archives during the “period of chaos” (that is, until Putin closed them again), especially by Mark Solonin. Still, it’s already a little dated, does not refer to the lates evidence and curiously believes that Solonin is a
pseudonym (Solonin lives outside Russia, in Estonia I believe, and uses his own name. He now has his own YouTube Chanel, where he has been explaining the history of the construction of the American & Soviet atom bombs (yes, the first Soviet version was entirely based on stolen Image
Read 5 tweets
9 Apr
Russia has now demanded that Slovakia returns the Sputnik V vaccine it has supplied to it. You may ask:"why?"
It's because the Slovaks noticed (as I told you here earlier ) that the vaccine is not identical to the one that was tested and described in
Lancet. It's not a joke. Russia really sent to Slovakia "nobody knowswhat" (here is the scene from Heart of a Dog, mentioned by Latynina a long a time ago in connection with the production of Russian vaccine, in which professor Preobrazhensky advises Dr Bormenthal not to drink
Soviet vodka because "God knows what they put into it. What came to their heads..."
Read 4 tweets
9 Apr
Russia’s former President and Prime Minister, currently deputy head of the Security Council Dmitri Medvedev has announced on Instagram that he is going to run for President in 2024. Medvedev published a photo of himself having lunch with Obama during their presidency. He wrote
“Russia has travelled a difficult route, but it has not gotten rid of the curse of the 90s. For the past 20 years have been ruled by scoundrels and ineffective managers. All this time they have been pulling Russia apart and leading our people to poverty.
The country is tired of amateurs and political crooks. The economic situation is not encouraging. The ruble has barely grown, the real incomes of Russians have increased only slightly, Russia came close to the fate of a rogue country.
Read 5 tweets
7 Apr
According to Konstantin Chumakov (Associstr zdirectir for vaccine research at FDA) this method generally produces a weak response from the immune system, which is why so called adjuvants are used. But an adjuvant can produce serious side effects which are not well understood.
In addition, the Vector vaccine is a one dose vaccine, a surprising decision for this type of vaccine.
The third Russian vaccine (inactivated virus) is made by the Chumakov Center (the former Polio Institute) named after Mikhail Chumakov (Konstantin’s father), who was one of
USSR’s most famous virologists (responsible for mass vaccination for polio). This institute (unlike Vector) has a lot of experience in making thus kind of vaccine & Konstantin Chumakov expects it to be Russia’s most reliable one. But the distrust created by the secrecy, false
Read 5 tweets
7 Apr
It’s interesting to note the state of the covid epidemic in Chile. Look at the rapid rise of infections (though not so much in deaths). Now, the point is that Chile is one of the world leaders in vaccination. But unlike the others, Israel, UK, US, it has been relying for 90% of ImageImage
its vaccinations on the Chinese Sinovac vaccine. The effectiveness of this vaccine is disputed but the worst results point to it being just over 50% effective, barely enough for approval in the US. UAE is also using this vaccine although in lesser proportion than Chile and the
results don’t look great either but there is visible improvement. Why would a vaccine based on “true and tried” over 100 years old technology be so ineffective? Well, to some extent it seems so because the new mRNA vaccines and the adenovirus based vector vaccines have proved Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!