2. Was the motive of Virological.org’s rush release due to competition to get the first releaser credit for the sars-cov-2 genome?
3. @GISAID claims 'the access credentials of some of the persons listed as authors of Wuhan-hu-1 were among the access credentials used on January 10, 2020 to access the first genomes available on GISAID'
4. @GISAID formally wrote to the authors who acknowledged Virological,org’s post as the world's first release of the SARS-COV-2 genome, and penalised the authors of MN908947
5. but @GISAID didn't identify who exactly from Fudan University or University of Sydney ACCESSED and KNEW about IVDC's 'initial' submission of IVDC-01/05 on GISAID on 10th Jan, 2020, via login records of their GISAID account credentials.
8. Professor Yong-Zhen Zhang's Genbank submission
This thread is #Genbank records regarding #MN908947. Evidence only, any further analysis upon this record subjects to individuals' own discretion.
9. In the presentation, was Edward Holmes referring to the 3rd January gag order?
Similar to the one communicated to WIV by China CDC via a phone call on january 1st? and China NHC?
10. Professor Holmes mentioned the gag order to paint Professor Zhang Yongzhen as a rebellious hero.
"But China CDC was in fact the force pushing that gag order, to intimidate hospitals, universities & Labs" time.com/5882918/zhang-…
11. ICDC vs IVDC
"For outsiders, yes, but inside the Chinese CDC, the gag order was a protection for their dominance, the only conflict here was the twisted power play between ICDC and IVDC"
12. Edward Holmes refers to the “key member”
Did he mean Xu Jianguo?
Xu Jianguo was Professor Yong-zhen Zhang's direct boss at ICDC, China, and the leader of the joint task force for pathogen identification in Wuhan.
13. Xu Jianguo organised the blind test kit trial which led to authorisation of the three basically useless early test kits, which gave false negatives and contributed to the death of many Wuhan citizens.
16. The Genome Publication Delay
The Chinese government finally made its genomes public on Jan. 12, a day after another team published one without authorization. That opened the door for more companies to make their own test kits.
17. Releasing the Genome 1. Yong-Zhen Zhang's team submitted the genome to Genbank on 05/01/2020, setting an embargo date for July 2020 2. They had no intention to release it immediately as the purpose was to get an accession number for Nature submission!
18. Our "hero" and Eddie's friend, Professor Yong-Zhen Zhang released the genome only AFTER he finished negotiating a secret validation which secured exclusive rights for three Shanghai testing kit companies.
19. Coincidences and Corruption
It turns out that all the CCDC affiliated researchers listed as authors on the first SARS-COV-2 genomes submitted to @GISAID on the 12th January, had interests in companies able to profit from the pandemic.
20. Some useful documents about the SARS-COV-2 genome initial release dates to review
21. Negotiations?
Both the Virological.org release and the GISAID release were preceded by negotiations.
1. In the virological.org release, Eddie Holmes negotiated with Professor Zhang Yongzhen 2. In the GISAID case, GISAID negotiated with China CDC.
22. This is not the plausible methodology for emerging outbreaks as this pandemic proved to us time is of the essence during the early response.
Negotiations allow backdoor agendas and quid-pro-quo and covering of tracks, right, Eddie?
23. Did @edwardcholmes the "virus spotter" not spot this when he worked so closely with these CCDC researchers?
His excuse: China Politics?
You're twistin' my melon man!
24. In other news...
GISAID later went on a narrative manipulation campaign using its strong position to help IVDC to 'reclaim' the first 'public release' trophy.
So they forward logged the GISAID actual public release time!
25. As for the talk about possible funding loss for poor "rectified" Professor Zhang, how much more funding can this 'first release' generate in the future?
He had a top PR company help his image in 2020, so we no need to worry too much about his funding..
Eddie Holmes had the genetic blueprint for the coronavirus in his possession for exactly 52 minutes before he put it online.
30. Prof Holmes (right) visited Wuhan Central Hospital with Prof Zhang and researchers from the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control in 2016 bbc.com/news/science-e…
31. Just "Some Pressure"?
as in Useless Test Kit Negotiation Pressure?
32. An expensive PR campaign
ST Asians of the Year
Top scientist's decision to publish genome map made at some personal risk? straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia…
2. investigations.peta.org/nih-monkey-tor…
It’s monkey fright night!
Experimenters terrify brain-damaged monkeys with fake snakes and spiders as part of a decades-long project in which monkeys are abused and terrorized. It cost you, the taxpayers, $47 million. @WhiteCoatWaste@anthonybellotti
1. Yes, this is good!
Page 118 onwards very juicy!
A BILL To address issues involving the People’s Republic of China.
SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘Strategic Competition Act of 2021’’. foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Emergent Bio-Kramer-BARDA-HHS-Kadlec-Fauci
U.S. Bet Big on Covid Vaccine Manufacturer Even as Problems Mounted nytimes.com/2021/04/06/us/…
“Viral cross-contamination confirmed in the control cells for JANSSEN GMP Lot #8.”
an examination by The @nytimes of manufacturing practices at the Baltimore facility found serious problems, including a corporate culture that often ignored or deflected missteps and a government sponsor, BARDA, that acted more as a partner than a policeman."
The Sun - WUHAN lab scientists developed the coronavirus so the deadly bug could be used in Hong Kong, bombshell emails reveal. Further emails from Deyin Guo, former dean of WHU School of Biomedical Sciences, discuss how they created the virus to crush the independence movement.
1. Observations from our friends in the North
A. Look at the clustering of early suspected covid cases based on the ILI data
B. The centre of the early epidemic seems to be in Wuchang, not Jianhang, where the seafood market is.
C. What is in Wuchang?
D. Why did the Chinese refuse to share the full 72 000 cases from their ILI surveillance with the WHO?
Source of image:
Using the COVID-19 to influenza ratio to estimate early pandemic spread in Wuhan, thelancet.com/journals/eclin…