Gandhi's grandfather was the Diwan of Porbandar and his mother's family managed the main Pranami temple of Porbandar. Just think what sort of a family background Kasturba would have come from.
Gandhi forced her to do what he did - his Harijan Seva and all, he gave away all her jewel - the ones which she brought from her parents, forced her to wear that coarse khadi, she saw her son ruined before her eyes because of Gandhi's obstinacy(he died of syphillis later)
and ultimately died of depression. What sort of a life she envisioned before marriage and what sort of a life she got? I am sure she would have cursed her parents daily for sending him to England for his education.
And the hypocrite he is, he refused Allopathic medicines for her even after his son begged Gandhi to get her medicines but he himself took them when he needed them. His apathy led to her death. And Devdas Gandhi never spoke with his father after this incident of 1942.
I am sure many would have cursed Gandhi for her treatment but the sort of dictator he is(as Jinnah puts it), no one would have risked siding her in public and get his or her political career ruined.
All I ask is this. A person whose failed on the home front, how can you expect him to be successful anywhere else? Had he left them to their own devices, may be, they would have been much happier.
Synopsis:
Left image is what she would have wanted in life. Right image is what she got.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was supposed to look into Google BERT and here I am, reading about Arab Caliphates (in an attempt to close my reading on Shahis). And know what? The whole narrative of Arab Enterprise till the rise of Abbasids can be defined through just two words - plunder and al Hind Miskeen!
So, what's the story all about? It all started with Uthman becoming the Caliph of Islam. When Persian and Syria were conquered, those rich lands became the property of invading armies and were loosely managed by the state.
By the time Uthman came to power, the Arab expansion came to a screeching halt. And the supply through plunder of new lands came to a near stop. With this, Medina had to demand money from the already conquered provinces - Uthman appointed his relatives to senior posts and
Abdur Rahman's The last two dynasties of the Sahis is considered to be the best book over Shahis. But, I am not getting any confidence over this. Compare these two sets.
I am interested to know how knowledged this gentleman is, on Sanskrit original of Rajatarangini and other Hindu/Buddhist books on the topic.
One should be realistic enough. Pakistan has fought three wars with India and no Indian will have access to Chhota Lahore or Hund. All they can quote is from some other reference or from historic memory.
The father in law of a Khotanese king in Gosthana Vyakarana - this single line tells much about Lalitaditya Muktapida than anything else except Kalhana's Rajatarangini. But, there is no mention of Lalitaditya here. What do we know of him and his achievements?
Next bit of information, from Petech's Kingdom of Ladakh. No reference to Lalitaditya even here!!
I don't know how many times I told this story before. This is the story of the end of the mighty Kabul Shahis. When Trilochanapala became the king, Mahmud of Ghazni decided to invade the kingdom for another round of plunder.
Trilochanapala anticipated it and asked his father-in-law Tunga, the defacto ruler of Kashmir to help. Tunga marched to Nandana but on hearing the news that the passes are blocked and Mahmud can't cross the Khyber, he returned back. Eventually, Mahmud came.
Trilochanapala sent his son to hold Mahmud as long as he can and went to Kashmir to get an army. Trilochanapala's son Bhimapala, immortalized in history as Nidar Bhim took his stand in Margalla Hills blocking Mahmud's way. A spirited defence it was, Mahmud was stuck for more than
Afonso de Albuquerque, during the Portuguese conquest of Malacca writes to his king that he seized a map from a Javanese pilot near Malacca. The map had details of areas almost till Antarctica(1000 km south of Tasmania) and even parts of Americas.
This begs one to pose a much bigger question. What do we know of the sea exploits of these thalassocracies, especially Srivijaya, Mataram and Majapahit, and the Indians, Chinese and Japanese. Clearly, their achievements are not mean -
Srivijaya invaded Zanzibar and populated Madagascar, Maldives is as good as a part of India, Chandravasi is the name for the Papuan Bird of Paradise in Indonesian. There are hints, but do we have information?
All I say is this. A secular government has no business with temples. And if freeing temples is a tricky subject, I would want governments to extend HRCE laws to all religions and cap govt expenses to a percentage of what govt gets from that religion.
In two words, if govts see fleecing and running down Hindu temples as a source of income, the same should be applicable to every religion and in the same proportion. No ifs and buts.
If Tirumala Temple lost 5000+ sqkm of area, why shouldn't a church face the same? If Muslims can contract temple lands, why shouldnt Hindus get rights over Waqf lands? When priests get as less as 100 rupees per month and are sacked for taking a Dakshina of 15 rupees,