CORONAVIRUSES WERE NEVER DROPLET ONLY (an droplet is a meaningless term and should be redefined as "airborne but not that infectious")
FROM A 2016 TEXTBOOK. YOU KNOW, A BIG BOOK OF KNOWLEDGE
FROM A 2016 TEXTBOOK. YOU KNOW, A BIG BOOK OF KNOWLEDGE
AND ASYMPTOMATIC CASES OF SARS.
C'MON people. Enough with just repeating talking points.
C'MON people. Enough with just repeating talking points.
from this book by Dr Hui
Anyway whatever, I am getting tired of refuting the nonsense.
It's in the air. Nebulizers were blamed during SARS, but lots of weird transmissions happened.
As "people" often say there is no dichotomy so I do not even understand the "droplet" vs "airborne" arg.
It's in the air. Nebulizers were blamed during SARS, but lots of weird transmissions happened.
As "people" often say there is no dichotomy so I do not even understand the "droplet" vs "airborne" arg.
It's in the air. We breathe it out.
Public health is bad at using air samplers.
When people who KNOW how to use them do, they can get live virus out of the air, for SARs, MERS, flu and many others.
BTW Dr. Hui used airborne precautions in HK for SARS
Enjoy the class actions
Public health is bad at using air samplers.
When people who KNOW how to use them do, they can get live virus out of the air, for SARs, MERS, flu and many others.
BTW Dr. Hui used airborne precautions in HK for SARS
Enjoy the class actions
That textbook was definitely able to be located at the latest, July 2020.
https://twitter.com/jmcrookston/status/1281190438708412416
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
