There is a single small stream flowing through the lands & is left unobstructed. Even High school science students know that 100s of acres of forest & tree cover are required to create a single water stream. Several such water streams form a tributary, many of which form a river.
<1% of Noyyal river basin is near a forest area and in that <0.0001% is flowing through lands near the Isha Yoga Center.
The argument that many institutions near Velliangiri hills are causing problems for Noyyal river water does not make any sense.
The majority of water supply to the Noyyal river is because of the rainfall. Noyyal has been having problems only because of irregular rain supply. When rain has been fine, the river water flow has been fine too. But when that rainwater supply is not enough, it is going dry.
As for Isha's buildings being in catchment area, the whole of Kongu belt is actually Noyyal catchment area. By argument, nobody can live in any of these places. So, stop spreading lies.
Now that this river argument is busted, the arguments of illegal constructions is also no longer valid. Isha Foundation has offered a clear explanation of the history of problems they had with HACA clearance and that the clearance has already been obtained.
And they have taken the legal route to stop the so-called 'demolition notice' before they got the approval.
Other than simply making statements, if you have real proofs that the Adiyogi statue is having no approvals, I beckon you to publish it publicly.
Your phone call claims seem the most bogus of all - please publish any records of that.
Cauvery has been calling for decades now, even before Isha Foundation even came into existence. Your article has not showcased any proofs of how Isha has really impacted Cauvery.
Earlier you and your buddies claimed that the Adiyogi statue was built by destroying forest lands. However, it was clearly proven later that the statue is in patta land, which you are forced to accept in your article also, and is in the midst of farmlands.
At best, your post is a hodge-podge of allegations & some timelines. But you have conveniently ignored timelines when they got:
- Legal stop for demolition notice
- HACA approvals
And why dig something from 2019 and share as if it is yesterday's news? What is your real motive?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is an attempt to bust the lies and half-truths in that article.
These are a few key points from the article that I thought are important to address upfront.
(1) Onus is on people to pressure governments (2) Can contribute only if they are tied to institutional arrangements (3) Ends up weakening India’s environmental regulatory framework
(4) The movement is a “dangerous distraction” from the climate-saving work being done by grassroots activists
Some of these sound serious. But first, let us ask ourselves some questions and if the answer to any of them is a YES, then there is at least a basic premise for panic.
There is a complete meltdown of the #left ecosystem in India with @SadhguruJV appearing on @Trevornoah's @TheDailyShow, talking about the #SaveSoil movement. The outpouring of hate for the man is weird to see and yet completely believable given the history of the Indian left.
It is hilarious to see many of them complaining about Trevor hosting Sadhguru and in the same breath speaking about the freedom of expression of individuals and how the left ecosystem is for providing equal opportunity to hear all voices.
And many of them claim to have a genuine concern for the environment as well. If you did not get the irony yet, you seriously need a college course in "Irony 101" :)
@NityJayaraman Dear Mr Jayaraman, some of your allegations about Isha Foundation seem completely baseless.
Let's talk first of Noyyal that you have alleged.
Isha Foundation's buildings are a few Kilometres far from the river bed.
@NityJayaraman <1% of Noyyal river basin is near a forest area and in that <0.0001% is flowing through lands near the Isha Yoga Center.
The argument that many institutions near Velliangiri hills are causing problems for Noyyal river water is not valid and not proven through any studies.
@NityJayaraman As for Isha's buildings being in catchment area, the whole of Kongu belt is actually Noyyal catchment area. By your argument, nobody can live in any of these places.
The source of hatred towards Sadhguru protected on SM by a certain section of Hindu Traditionalists seems to be based on him successfully galvanizing massive public support to #FreeHinduTemples!
No wonder the British were able to divide and rule us so easily in the past 🤦♂️
Did Sadhguru ever say he is the one to start a movement like this? NO
Did pioneers of the movement to legally & constitutionally free Hindu temples, like @trramesh or @jsaideepak say so? NO
Did anyone get this kind of public support before or did anyone prevent them? Perhaps No
Did Sadhguru or his team ever publish anything like them being the only custodians of temple freedom movement? NO
Did many Dharmic gurus from across the country support this endeavour? YES
Then why is so much angst & acrid behaviour towards Sadhguru from some sections alone?
Mr Karti should clarify how letting go of government control will lead to exclusion of marginalised communities. Are you aware that there is something called the "Temple Entry Authorisation Act" of 1947 that specifically prevents discrimination of Hindus from entering temples.
By the way, what measures do you have today to prevent any such discrimination happening in Christianity? At least, there is a legal framework available for Hindus. And before lecturing about no such thing in Christianity, first check about the troubles faced by Dalit Christians.
More importantly, did he ever ask the temples be given to him? Why are you spreading such false ideas? If you have any proof for that, please publish it.
For someone who is so concerned about our temples, what have you got to say about their pathetic state currently?
BS is all in Vaibhav's mind it appears, misinterpreting Raas as sexual, Lover as sexual and Gopi's devotion to Krishna as sexual. Well, a mind full of such filth can only spew more of that!
There are so many ridiculous points that I was flabbergasted where to even start.
As I started going through his thread, there are misinterpretations after misinterpretations and deliberate misrepresentation in some cases.
This n00b thinks he can identify a Dharmacharya because "they would know Sanskrit and will be from a tradition".
Somebody please ask him how that traditional paths started in the first place and such illogical reasoning was why even Adi Shankara was ridiculed by so many others in his own lifetime. People often worship gurus after they leave but not when they are alive 😏