“The arrival of Ramaḍān is the reason for beginning the fast, and so Allāh opens the gates of the Garden. The Garden is the veil. The fast is part of veiled action which only Allāh knows because it is non-action. It is not existential action so that it might appear to the eye...
...or be done by the limbs. It is veiled from all except Allāh. Only Allāh knows it in the person fasting. The person fasting is the person so named by the divine law, not
the hungry person.
“Allāh locks the gates of the fire.” When the gates of the fire are locked, it turns back on itself and its heat is multiplied on it and it consumes itself. The person fasting is like that with his nature. When he fasts, the gates of the fire of his nature are shut.
He experiences more heat by the fast since moist things are not being utilized. He feels the pain of that in his belly. His appetite for food is increased because he imagines that he will experience relief through it. Therefore the fire of his appetite is strengthened...
...by locking the door to the reception of food and drink.
The satans are chained. They are the attribute of distance. The person fasting is near to Allāh by the attribute of timeless self-reliance. He is involved in an act of worship which has no like, and by that, he is near..
...to the attribute of the One about whom it is said: “There is not like Him anything.” When you have this attribute, the satans are chained for you. It is related in Tradition: “Satan flows in the son of Ādam as blood flows, so blocks his canals by hunger and thirst,” that is,..
...these means are specified for him against Satan’s desire for to be involved in excess. Excess means “what is more.””
— Shaykh al Akbar Muḥyi ‘d-Dīn ibn al ʿArabī qaddasa Allāhu sirrah, al Futūḥāt al Makkīyyah
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“The faster has two joys: a joy when he breaks his fast, and a joy when he meets his Lord [for his fasting].”
[Muttafaqun ʿalayh]
“The joy when one breaks their fast is not intended as to what some people perceive, that it is due to the strains of hunger and the disappearance..
...of the fatigue of fasting. Rather, it is due to what Allāh ﷻ has perfected upon them from the blessings when Allāh gives them success in fasting and willed for them the completion of fasting for that day.”
— Sayyidī ‘l-Ḥabīb ʿAbduLlāh b. Muḥsin b. Muḥammad al Aṭṭās
“The joy when one breaks their fast is not intended as their falling into their desires for food and drink (i.e. satiating their hunger), albeit the wording supports that. Rather, what is intended is loftier than that. It is the perfection of this tremendous worship and...
komen: “Masalah dia korang gosok gigi dlm kerete ke?🤣🤣🤣🤣”
“«Dan digalakkan untuk bersiwak dalam setiap masa», seperti yang dikatakan oleh al Rāfiʿī, tatkala ṣalāt dan selainnya kerana keṣaḥīḥan ḥadīth² berkenaan penggalakan (istiḥbāb) [bersiwak] pada setiap waktu.”
— Shaykh Ṭāhā ʿAbd al Ḥamīd Ḥamādī ḥafidhahuLlāh, Fatḥ al Wahhāb al Mālik
“Dan digalakkan untuk bersiwak pada waktu selain waktu² ini (iaitu waktu ketika berwuḍūʿ) sepertimana telah kami bicarakan sebelum ini di dalam muqaddimah. Dan yang menandakannya..
...adalah apa yang diriwayatkan di dalam dua Ṣaḥīḥ bahawasanya apabila dia ﷺ ingin berdiri [untuk ṣalāt] pada waktu malam, dia mensiwakkan mulutnya.
Dari Abī Dāwūd: Dia ﷺ tidak bangun dari tidurnya pada waktu pagi ataupun malam melainkan dia bersiwak sebelum berwuḍūʿ.
The Month of Shaʿbān: the Month of Sending Prayers upon the Prophet ﷺ
“From the excellences of the month of Shaʿbān: it is the month when the verse of sending prayers and peace upon the Emissary of Allāh ﷺ is sent down, which is His Words: “Indeed, God and His angels send prayers upon the Prophet. O you who believe! Send prayers upon...
...[the Prophet,] and salute him with a worthy salutation of peace!” [33:56]
It is mentioned by Ibn Abī ‘ṣ-Ṣayf al Yamanī who said: Verily, the month of Shaʿbān is the month of sending prayers upon the Prophet ﷺ as its verse was sent down in it [al Fishnī, Tuḥfat al Ikhwān]
the individuals considered as qubūriyyūn mushrik by Khālid ʿAlī al Marḍī al Ghāmidī, to name a few:
[8th Century Hijrah]
• Muḥammad b. al Ḥājj al ʿAbdarī al Fāsī
• Taqīy al Dīn al Subkī
• Tāj al Dīn al Subkī
• Ibn Baṭūṭah
[9th Century]
• ʿAbd al Karīm al Jīlī
• the grammarian, ʿAbd a Qāhir al Jurjānī
• Muḥammad b. Sulaymān al Jazūlī
• the theologian, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al Sanūsī
• the muḥtasib, Aḥmad Zarrūq al Fāsī
• ʿAbd al Raḥmān al Jāmī
[10th Century]
• Jalāl al Dīn al Suyūṭī
• the shāriḥ of al Bukhārī, al Qasṭallānī
• the muḥaqqiq, Ibn Ḥajar al Haythamī (supposed to be al Haytamī)
• the Ṣūfī, ʿAbd al Wahhāb al Shaʿrānī
[11th Century]
• ʿAbd al Raʾūf al Munāwī
• Mujaddid Alf Thānī, Aḥmad Sirhindī
• Ibn ʿĀshir al Mālikī
• ʿAbd al Ḥaqq al Dihlawī
to say that the books of faḍāʾil are filled with fabrication without actually going through them is dishonesty because Mawlānā Zakariyyā al Kandahlawī added takhrīj for every single ḥadīth that he placed in those books.
there’s no denying that yes, some of the ḥadīths in them might be considered by a ḥadīth scholar as mawḍūʿ, but it is possible that it is considered as ḍaʿīf or even ḥasan by another due to the differences in their methodology.
ḥadīths can have varying gradings, and that’s true for every one of them; even those in Ṣaḥīḥ al Bukhārī where Imām al Dāraquṭnī did criticise some of them (though his arguments are considered weak).
and we need to put in mind as well that ḍaʿīf ≠ mawḍūʿ.