1/ This story quotes an anonymous "Democratic strategist" who argues "voting on an assault weapons ban would help fuel Republican arguments that the Biden administration is coming to take their guns"
This 🧵explains why this kind of thinking isn't supported by data or facts
2/ Pundits have long recycled notion that lawmakers who support gun safety are minutes away from losing their seats. Narrative began after Dem loses in 1994 following Clinton's gun reform push
Do me a favor: ignore the pundits & ask the statisticians who actually study this...
3/ "The vote for gun control mattered, but the vote for the tax increase and healthcare were more important," says Gary Jacobson, who has done a statistical analysis of what votes affected the outcome of the 1994 election. More on that here: usnews.com/news/articles/…
4/ It's also worth noting that after Clinton passed the assault weapon ban in 1994....he still ran on it in 1996 (when he was re-elected to a second term) AND both George W. Bush and John Kerry supported the ban in their 2004 race...
5/ We gotta realize that @NRA's influence has ⬇️ significantly in recent years
@NRA endorsements usually go to incumbent Republicans w/ almost 0 chance of losing & where it does give them an advantage, it's minimal (opinions are pretty baked in on this issue)
@NRA 6/ Generally speaking, @NRA has significantly fewer allies in Congress than it did a decade ago.Look at how many fewer A-rated @NRA candidates were in 2008 vs. 2018: nytimes.com/interactive/20…
@NRA 7/ And look at what happened during the 2018 midterms. At least 32 of @NRA’s top-champions in House were defeated, the majority of whom accepted gun lobby contributions and A-ratings.
In 2020, a bunch of @NRA priority lawmakers also lost their seats: Gardner, McSally, Perdue...
@NRA 8/ A closer look at 2020 only underscores @NRA's weakness.
Biden/Harris ran on one of the most ambitious and comprehensive gun reform agendas in history (i.e. they didn't hide the ball)....
@NRA 9/ In the states that decided the election – AZ, GA, PA, NV, NC, WI – 50% to 58% of voters supported stricter gun laws.
Only 9% to 13% of voters in the same states want to weaken gun laws...
@NRA 10/ At the same time spending on elections from gun violence prevention organizations is only increasing:
@NRA 11/11 So let's stop regurgitating people's mostly unfounded perceptions of @NRA's strength & actually look at the data behind it.
Advancing gun reform is going to galvanize the other side, but if gun safety lawmakers & advocates put up a robust fight, we can & will WIN.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ 🧵 I want to take a moment to talk about hate & abuse that's directed at those of us who work in progressive politics or policy....
2/ I'm struggling with how to frame this thread. I don't want to come off as just complaining about some nasty comments at a time when there are so many larger injustices that folks -- particularly women and people of color -- confront every single day
3/ But I also don't want to stay silent. I don't want to normalize coordinated online attacks against me for simply being who I am. I don't want to accept daily directed hate as part of the cost of speaking out in our democracy. I want to find a proactive way of combating it.
1/ I want to take a moment to highlight some of @POTUS' priorities for fighting the public health pandemic of gun violence in the administration's just-released skinny budget...they're really exciting! 🧵
@POTUS 2/ @POTUS is supporting existing programs to improve background check systems 👏
This is crucially important because the background check system has been strained by the surge in gun sales. (Note: during Trump, @FBI asked for more funding to keep up with the demand)
@POTUS@FBI 3/ @POTUS is seeking investment in new programs to incentivize State adoption of gun licensing laws.
10 states have licensing laws & we know that they're essential for ⬇️ gun violence & trafficking. (IE after CT implemented licensing, gun homicides ⬇️ 40%, gun suicides ⬇️ 15%)
@POTUS 2/ PLCAA came out of a slew of legal challenges in 1990s & early 2000s that culminated in an effort to sue gunmakers for continuing to knowingly sell guns to dealers who regularly funneled weapons to criminals and for failing to include safety features that could've saved lives.
@POTUS 3/ In 2000, Smith & Wesson settled several of these civil lawsuits and agreed to sell safety devices with its hand-guns and hold its authorized dealers to a certain code of conduct.
1/ Last week, after @JoeBiden said he'll focus on infrastructure rather than gun violence prevention as his next legislative priority, over 87 gun violence prevention organizations came together urging @POTUS to prioritize gun reform & Congress to work w/ him on it #TheTimeIsNow
@JoeBiden@POTUS 2/ We argued that @POTUS inherited a ⬆️ gun violence crisis & the country needed his leadership to save lives *now*
In fact, since his press conference on Thursday, we've experienced:
1/ I'm glad @POTUS connected the mass shooting in Atlanta to the "public health crisis of gun violence in this country" during his remarks
But I'll be honest -- I'm very disappointed that he didn't say more about the toxic combination of hatred & easy access to guns. Here's why
@POTUS 2/ The reality is that hate crimes in America often become deadly because guns are so easy to get.
In Georgia, it's easier to get a gun than to vote.
The alleged mass shooter in Georgia bought his gun THE VERY SAME DAY he killed 8 people
@POTUS 3/ We know that a whole array of gun violence prevention legislation -- from background checks to waiting periods to assault weapons bans -- can be very impactful in making it harder for bad actors to obtain firearms -- and save lives in the process.
"Local police officers have appeared at times to side with the Proud Boys, especially when they have squared off against leftists openly critical of law enforcement. "via @NYTimesnytimes.com/2021/03/14/us/…
Oh wow: “After a complaint from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the police department said the officer’s affiliation with the Proud Boys did not violate its policies, in part because it was not considered a white supremacist group”
“If the Proud Boys was not a white male chauvinist club but a Black male chauvinist club, I think that, sadly, we would have seen a different policing posture,” said Ms. Neumann, the former Homeland Security official.