I found that the Chinese government trademarked the entire South China Sea in 2014, filing thousands of trademark applications covering 281 specific rocks, reefs, and regions – including features already occupied by other countries.

Thread: (1/) benarnews.org/english/news/p…
Each of these trademarks is composed of the feature’s name in stylized Chinese calligraphy and is categorized under one of 45 international trademark classes. All of the trademarks belong to Sansha City, which administers China’s claims in the South China Sea. (2/)
Many also have an English transliteration of the feature’s name and an illustrated logo. These are the trademarked names and logos for Mischief Reef, Fiery Cross Reef, Subi Reef, and the entire Spratly Islands. (3/)
As mentioned above, China also trademarked numerous rocks and reefs controlled by other claimants, like Taiwan-occupied Itu Aba, Philippines-occupied Thitu Island, and Vietnam-occupied Sin Cowe Island. (4/)
At least one of the trademarks is being used in the real world. The trademarked “Sansha” logo can be spotted on Sansha City’s supply ships, its website, and podiums used by the municipal government. (5/)
According to Chinese state media, “applying to register trademarks for the names of Sansha City’s islands and reefs in accordance with China’s ‘Trademark Law’ was the most direct embodiment of declaring sovereignty.” (6/)
Sansha City also registered these trademarks to “protect the geographical name ownership of each island, reef, shoal, and island” and “prevent trademark squatting.” (7/)
I talked with @julianku about what this all means. Turns out that the trademarks could potentially help the PRC government wield lawsuits to control how Chinese and foreign companies use South China Sea branding, though the legal strength of these trademarks is questionable. (8/)
We also reached out to the authorities in Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Malaysia. Officials in both Taiwan and Vietnam gave us statements rejecting the trademarks. (9/)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zachary Haver

Zachary Haver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zacharyhaver

1 Apr
Ran across an interesting study from back in 2013: Chinese researchers evaluated the "strategic position" of 131 features in the Spratly Islands. Explicitly proposed improving the "strategic position" of features through artificial construction... (1/)
(2/) Looks like the research received state funding via the 863 Program. And the authors were all affiliated with the Nanjing University Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology.
(3/) They analyzed a bunch of different factors, ranging from "maritime military deterrence effect" to "navigation ease" to "runway construction length conditions."
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
PRC officials claim that the ships swarming Whitsun Reef do not belong to China's maritime militia.

But even if that were true, China can still mobilize civilian fishermen to control areas of the South China Sea.

Thread on my latest for @CCPWatch: (1/)

ccpwatch.org/single-post/ch…
(2/) Thanks to China's investments in the BeiDou satellite navigation system, nearly every civilian fishing vessel operating in the South China Sea can perform a maritime surveillance role. This is because BeiDou has built-in two-way texting capabilities.
(3/) When Chinese fishermen are carrying out their normal fishing activities, if they spot a foreign vessel, they can use BeiDou to quickly report the foreign vessel to the authorities (e.g. the CCG or PLA).
Read 11 tweets
14 Jan
This analysis of the dynamics at play in the South China Sea is dangerously misleading. A few reasons why: (1/)
(2/) First, we need to make a distinction between China's massive reclamation campaign and the minor reclamation activities of other claimants. China is the only claimant that has built artificial islands the size of Washington DC.
(3/) Moreover, the US is not imposing "sanctions" on Chinese entities. It is imposing visa restrictions and export restrictions, which are not the same thing as sanctions. This might seem pedantic, but the distinction is important (more on this later).
Read 10 tweets
5 Jan
In my new report with @ChinaMaritime, I reveal how Sansha City has built a system of administrative control in the South China Sea (SCS) and how China is using this system to transform contested areas into de facto Chinese territory.

Thread: (1/)
digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-maritime-…
(2/) Sansha was created in 2012 and is headquartered on Woody Island. Its jurisdiction covers 2 million square kilometers and includes the Paracel Islands, the “Zhongsha Islands” (Macclesfield Bank and Scarborough Shoal), the Spratly Islands, and their surrounding waters.
(3/) As China’s vanguard in the SCS, Sansha is responsible for exercising administrative control, implementing military-civil fusion, and performing the work of “rights defense, stability maintenance, environmental protection, and resource development” (维权维稳保护开发).
Read 12 tweets
4 Dec 20
As usual, @QuincyInst's views on the South China Sea disputes are divorced from reality. In what world should we stop exercising our freedom of navigation in exchange for "affirmations" from China that they won't interfere with our freedom of navigation? That makes no sense.
Moreover, Quincy conveniently fails to address the most pressing issue in the South China Sea: how China uses maritime law enforcement and maritime militia forces to preclude it's neighbors (including U.S. allies and partners) from operating freely within their own waters.
Simply put, you can't provide recommendations for U.S. policy in the South China Sea without addressing the problem of assertive PAFMM and CCG operations. Nothing gets solved as long as China gets to aggressively use the PAFMM and CCG without facing any consequences.
Read 11 tweets
31 Aug 20
It looks like Chinese international students at @GWtweets are being required to consent to a "Data Privacy Notice for Students in China" to ensure their access to online classes. Students are raising safety concerns because of the National Security Law.
Regarding the content of the notice, students seem particularly worried about a clause that says "GW may transfer your Personal Data to its affiliates or third-party service providers inside or outside of the United States for the above purposes."
There's also a reference to Chinese law, though they stress that "we put in place robust safeguards to ensure that your privacy is protected and to ensure that our legitimate interests are not overridden by your interests or fundamental rights."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!