Raghu Karnad Profile picture
14 Apr, 15 tweets, 4 min read
On the 130th #AmbedkarJayanti, a short thread on a milestone in his life, described as the "Beginning of a New Era" – when he was appointed to the Viceroy's Executive Council at the height of the WW2...
2. In July 1941, to win support for the war-effort, the Viceroy of India agreed to expand his Executive Council, the cabinet in charge of the Central government. He would appoint eight ‘representative Indians’ -- all of course, from the social elite.
3. With his appointments, he had left out the Indian politician most staunchly supportive of the war – and a leader with a mass following – BR Ambedkar of the Independent Labour Party.
4. But the case for Ambedkar was undeniable, and a year later, in July 1942, he joined the rarified ranks of the Viceroy's cabinet, with the labour portfolio.
This headline in the Bombay Sentinel captures the emotion of that moment:
5. This image is from @ROUNDTABLEIND, which has transcribed the Sentinel article in full.

"Never before in our long and chequered history has a member of the Depressed Class held such a high office in the governance of the country."
roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?opti…
6. Ambedkar plunged into his role, and a massive wave of recruitment from the 'Depressed Classes' followed.
At the same time, he clearly announced that his purposes were anything but conservative...
7. In a speech on All India Radio: “If this is a war against the New Nazi Order, it is not a war for the Old Order. It is a war on both the Old Order and the Nazi Order…" (contd)
8. "The only compensation for the cost of this war is the establishment or a New Order in which liberty, equality, and fraternity will not be mere slogans but will become facts of life.”
9. The whole speech, titled 'Why Labour is Determined to Win the War', is an excellent read for understanding the intersections of WW2, the freedom movement, and the social revolution that Ambedkar held even above the goal of mere Independence.
10. Worth quoting at length is his reply to nationalists, ie Congress, on their single priority of achieving self-government.
Speaking for his party, Ambedkar said:

"As to nationalism, Labour’s attitude is quite clear. Labour is not prepared to make a fetish of nationalism..."
Ambedkar: "If nationalism means the worship of the ancient past — the discarding of everything that is not local in origin and colour — then Labour cannot accept nationalism as its creed. Labour cannot allow the living faith of the dead to become the dead faith of the living."
Ambedkar: "Labour will not allow the ever-expanding spirit of man to be strangled by the hand of the past which has no meaning for the present and no hope for the future... Labour must [nsist on] being ever ready to borrow in order to repair... and recreate the body politic..."
Ambedkar: "If nationalism stands in the way of this ... reshaping of life, then Labour must deny nationalism.
Labour’s creed is internationalism. Labour is interested in nationalism only because the wheels of democracy work better in a community united by national sentiments."
"Nationalism to Labour is only a means to an end. It is not an end in itself to which Labour can agree to sacrifice what it regards as the most essential principles of life."

- Ambedkar on AIR in Dec 1942. Vol 10 of his Writing & Speeches, online here: ruralindiaonline.org/bn/library/res…
What went missing in my thread:
During the surge in war-time employment, Ambedkar used his ministry to create new labour protection policy, recognise trade unions, and provided women workers – all before Independence.

roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?opti…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Raghu Karnad

Raghu Karnad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rkarnad

11 Feb
A @YouTube video, trending on Twitter this morning, called for Indian journalists - including my friends and colleagues - to be 'hanged to death' for treason. It had half a million views before it was taken down just now. (1/3)
Alongside threats, the video explicitly named @BDUTT @zoo_bear @dhruv_rathee @khanumarfa @TheDeshBhakt @SaketGokhale @RanaAyyub @missanabeem @fayedsouza & websites like @thenewsminute as conspirators; it also implied that the journalists aim to assassinate the video-creator (2/3)
The video claimed to 'prove' that these orgs were conspiring to 'destroy India'. It said said the news sites mentioned in the farmers' protest #toolkit were also endorsed in a thread by @missanabeem, and also formed the DIGIPUB News Foundation in Oct 2020. That's it. (3/3)
Read 4 tweets
3 Feb
Since tweets by @rihanna and @miakhalifa are now considered 'external forces' and 'foreign interference', a small reminder... During the first Emergency, the Sangh's main line of dissent was through foreign press, governments, activists, and funding.
A short thread.
(2) The RSS has a fanciful mythology of its resistance within India, but there's not much evidence of it. @Swamy39 wrote in the year 2000 that ‘most of the leaders of the BJP/RSS had betrayed the struggle against the Emergency,’ offering ‘to work for the nation’s tormentors’...
(3) Instead it was overseas intelligentsia (from the Left) who gave the anti-Emergency movement early moral support. But Sangh leaders like Makarand Desai also lobbied @nytimes & other Western papers to editorialise on the silencing of dissent & capture of the judiciary in India.
Read 10 tweets
8 Jan
Why don't we stop describing the violent arrest of #MunawarFaruqui as a case of free speech vs religious sentiments. That's already false.

It's a case-study of the new political entrepreneurship: find ways to criminalise Muslims... advance in The Party. Zero sentiments involved.
(2) Just consider the bare facts: After he's beaten, arrested and denied bail, police say there is "no evidence against him".
But the vigilante who went for him, the son of an MLA (classic), is being paraded on @zeenews shows tagged "हिंदू का अपमान सबसे आसान
#HindusForGranted"
(3) And even been graciously, patiently interviewed by @BDUTT on @themojostory and given space to flaunt his wounded 'religious sentiments'. Recognition and a platform from a central figure of the liberal press.
That interview is now his pinned tweet, of course.
Read 9 tweets
14 Dec 20
[Thought experiment]

Like him or hate him, the Prime Minister comands wide support - having won the last election with well over 300 seats. Yet a protest movement has now openly declared that it will remove him from office through non-electoral means.

Contd...
(2) Protesters are gathering in New Delhi with plans to besiege the Prime Minister's house. ‘We intend to overthrow him,’ an opposition leader tells the media. ‘Thousands of us will surround his house to prevent her from going out or receiving visitors.'
Contd...
(3) This follows over a year of student-protests involving extreme disruption and frequent bloodshed.
A Union minster has been assassinated.
And the figurehead of the protest movement has called on police Army personnel to disregard orders they consider 'illegal'.

Contd...
Read 12 tweets
15 Oct 20
Even after its recent stand, the Hindi film industry needs to keep watching the channels that have attacked it & persecuted its women actors.
Why?
Not to see what the channels are saying, but to see a clear picture of what #Bollywood itself is expected to become. (1/7)
(2) Basic principle: The new extremist movement first asks for compromises from industry players. Then it coerces / co-opts them. But the endgame is to destroy existing players & rebuild the industry from its cadre.

Why coerce the film industry, when you could possess it?
(3) This endgame is close for India's 'news' TV. You can see the English broadcasters strung down a gradient: From accommodation, to compromises, to co-option, to full possession (you-know-who at each position.) The game is rigged so they keep moving, or come under fire.
Read 9 tweets
26 Aug 20
In 2017, the Jaipur Lit Fest hosted two RSS leaders for a special conversation. @DalrympleWill defended the decision against all objections (including mine).

He’s consistently platformed conservative & far-right speakers, while disagreeing with their beliefs (1/4)
But a few days ago, with zero evidence of his role in the @BloomsburyIndia decision, right-wing media figures declared Dalrymple an enemy in something called “The War”, slandered him as a Jihadist, and physically threatened his home in Delhi. (2/4)
(3/4) An IAS officer openly called for his books to be burned - and for people to share videos of the book-burnings. This is where we've come.

None of the right-wing figures whom @JaipurLitFest hosted in style spoke up in Dalrymple's defence that night.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!