Congrats to @brian_armstrong & @coinbase on historic Direct Listing on @Nasdaq. As Mike Moritz noted, the choice of a direct listing or a traditional IPO has become a test of two attributes: courage and intelligence. Applaud Brian's courage in leading us to a modern approach.
Using their archaic non-market based pencils, bankers would have recommend the reference price for a traditional IPO. This $250 price is off 50%/$34B from actual market price. Why we continue to allow a non-market approach with intentional limits on participants is baffling.
Coinbase's founders, employees, & investors all accrue massive, real economic rewards as a result of the DL. Had they been exposed to the exploitive, archaic IPO process they would all suffer at the hands of the machine. These constituents should be thankful for DL decision.
Electronic matching of supply/demand was a breakthrough in early 1980's when first introduced into financial markets. The fact that our IPO process hasn't adopted this practice 41 years later, is a direct result of regulatory capture & systems failure. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_mat…
It's so exciting to see us move to a modern approach that matches supply/demand & IMPORTANTLY is open to all participants in the market. Not a "free giveaway" game that is limited to the elite large clients of the banks. It really is time to move forward.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Gurley

Bill Gurley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bgurley

13 Apr
Working w/ @kmlake has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my career. As such, when we first discussed the idea of a new CEO, I had mixed feelings. That said, as I have grown to know @ElizSpaulding, I am remarkably optimistic/excited about what lies ahead. [more]
@ElizSpaulding is a powerhouse leader. One of the smartest strategic thinkers & most ambitious leaders I have ever met. And she intersects with @stitchfix at an opportune time. I have never worked with a company where at year 10, I see WAY MORE opportunity ever before.
The vision of delivering a personalized store for each & every customer is real & underway. It leverages the vast resources & data science capabilities of the company, & we are well positioned to thrive. I have high confidence in @ElizSpaulding leading us on this special journey.
Read 5 tweets
31 Jan
Many say $GME/RH situation is a "problem in the plumbing," implicating the structural integrity/complexity of our financial systems. If the SEC/government wants to "fix the plumbing" the number one thing they should do is ban Payment for Order Flow. [more] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_f…
PFOF is a practice that "smells bad" the moment you hear about it. Only through contorted mental gymnastics can one come up with "pro" arguments, but never in a clear enough way that you could pass it along yourself. UK outlawed it in 2012. Illegal in Canada. Why...? [more]
In 2004 letter from Citadel's attorney Jonathan G. Katz to SEC, he makes a a definitive & eloquent list of all the reasons that, "The practice of payment for order flow creates serious conflicts of interest and should be banned." Please read detail. [more] sec.gov/rules/concept/…
Read 4 tweets
16 Jan
In 2009, I wrote "However, if a disruptive competitor can offer a product or service similar to yours for 'free,' and if they can make enough money to keep the lights on, then you likely have a problem." This is why Signal vs Facebook is so interesting. abovethecrowd.com/2009/07/15/bil…
Signal has two things most non-profit efforts lack. First, in @moxie, a talented, technical-capable, ambitious, & mission-driven leader. Second, in @brianacton, @jankoum, & likely @jack as well as @elonmusk, you have an endless supply of funding. That's a powerful combination.
For Facebook/WhatsApp this represents a extreme form of what I call "orthogonal" competition. There is no class in business school that tells you how to deal with a formidable, non-commercial player in the market. Your core intuitions about how to attack & respond are likely off.
Read 5 tweets
22 Dec 20
A wonderful 2020 Xmas present to the founders, employees, & investors at VC-backed startups. SEC just APPROVED the ability to add primary capital (fundraise) to a direct listing. It's very exciting to see the SEC enable innovation in this way. (more) sec.gov/rules/other/20…
This is HUGE & will hopefully end 40 years of mispriced IPOs through an old antiquated process that failed to match supply/demand & wasn't open to all investors. 2018:$6B in underpricing. 2019 $7B. 2020, new record => $34B in one day gains for i-bank customers with allocation.
The SEC properly honed in on the two key advantages of a Direct Listing. The first key point is "open access to all investors." Hot IPO access is limited to a few selected ibank customers. Now anyone can participate.
Read 5 tweets
30 Sep 20
Congrats to @moskov & team @asana as well as Alex Karp & team @PalantirTech on their respective Direct Listings today. Also thanks to team at Morgan Stanley (big supporter of DLs), @stacey_cunning & team @NYSE who make this work so well, & Citadel (DMM).
Fixing the IPO problem was first championed by icons like Pierre Omidyar (Ebay), & Larry/Sergey (Google) who all felt IPOs should be "open to all." Then Barry McCarthy/@eldsjal (@Spotify) broke open the DL door (w/ tons of hard work), & @stewart (@SlackHQ) widened that doorway.
Our entire industry benefits from the work of these pioneers; we owe them all our gratitude. Michael Moritz said "the choice of a direct listing or a traditional IPO has become a test of two attributes: courage and intelligence." The "courage" part is the hardest of the two. 🙏
Read 4 tweets
23 Sep 20
Been meaning to make this recommendation for some time, & as with "Range," I am several months late. I really, really loved "How Innovation Works" from @mattwridley It is a very elegant follow up to "The Rational Optimist" - read both if you can. (more) amazon.com/How-Innovation…
One of the most amazing things about both books is Matt's ability to connect the dots across very long time horizons. Very few can. He also has the ability to combine thinking from many fields - most notably science, technology, psychology, & a heavy dose of microeconomics.
Relative to our world in Silicon Valley, Matt shows how "what we do" is not new, but a very old (and critically important) process. He refers to idea generation as "invention," & notes that successful "go to market" (which he calls innovation) is far more important. Agree 10x!
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!