Today on Mark Solonin’s YouTube Chanel there is another fascinating video in his “technicum” (a word use for technological higher schools in Russia & much of Eastern Europe), that is, how he calls his presentations devoted to technical (usually related to aviation) aspects of
recent history (this includes a series of talks on the development of atom bombs). Mark Solonin is the leading “revisionist” (i.e. one who rejects the official Soviet version) of WWII on the Eastern Front (aka “The Great Patriotic War”) as well as an aviation engineer, who used
to work on secret Soviet projects in Samara (in Soviet days “Kuybyshev”). Now Solonin has finally turned to a subject that I was long hoping he would take up: the Smolensk air disaster of 2010. I have listened only to about a half of the talk & will report on the whole later.
But it’s clear that Solonin concentrated on the technical aspects and does not intend to make a definite conclusion. What he does do is to totally demolish the official report by MAK (mak-iac.org/o-mak/ ) the ludicrously misnamed “International Aviation Committee”
(actually its members are only states belonging to Commonwealth of Independent States and the actual “investigative committee consisted of “experts” from Russia, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan). Solonin carefully shows that the entire report is a pack of lies and fabrications.
I shall report more on this after I have listened to the whole piece (assuming I find some time - there is no written script and translating from YouTube is time consuming) but I can’t resist this fragment, at the beginning:
“There was this no less terrible tragedy on the
31st October 2015 a Russian passenger plane crashed over the Sinai Peninsula. Hundreds of persons died. Anyone who remembers (anyone who doesn’t can look at the screen now) will recall that the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation immediately started promoting the
version that it was a technical fault, and they all knew perfectly that it wasn’t terrorism. However, your humble servant, on the date that you can see (Nov 11), based absolutely on publicly available information (I have never had and could not have any insider
information) published in Fontanka, his opinion that it was a terrorist explosion. So all the trolls rushed to the site and commented that this psychopath always imagines explosions, but another 11 days passed and the 17th November 2015, he was then President, not Prime Minister,
ordered the elimination of those responsible. Thus they all admitted that it was an act of terrorism. So sometimes even a blogger can see something significant.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

16 Apr
@CassianoDFarias That was discussed already at the beginning of the pandemic, see for example this extract from a paper in Nature, and the difficulties were described in some detail by K. Chumakov isn several interviews in a Russian. And for each adenovirus based vaccine there have since been Image
@CassianoDFarias reports of production difficulties. Russia has hardly produced any second doses for its Sputnik 5 vaccine (it uses a different adenovirus from the one used for the first dose and it seems that can’t grow it in large quantities so they have been touting “Sputnik Light” - which
@CassianoDFarias just the first dose of Sputnik V. AstraZeneca’s problems are well known, see for example

theguardian.com/business/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
14 Apr
The final part of Illarionov's article is entitled "What Biden's phone call revealed about his attitude to Ukraine". I decided it would be better to make it into a separate thread, as it is essentially self-contained.
Not Biden's call (and the follow-up) clearly clearly showed what he was going to do and what he was not going to do. A lot of additional information has emerged showing how Biden actually relates to Ukraine.
First, the Washington-based "Politico" , which seems to have monopolized the channels of intentional leaks from the White House, has reminded us not for the first time that Biden had been keeping Ukraine at arm's length. ...
Read 39 tweets
11 Apr
So here is Latynina's view on things. And, I have to say, I find it the most convincing of all.
Yes, these are demonstrative actions, it is important to emphasize, because all this happens in the daytime, without any disguise. But we must understand that if the demonstration does not have an effect, then it can get out of control.
And, of course, we also must not forget Russian propagandists who tell us about an innocent baby which was killed by “Ukrainian fascists” for ritual purposes, by using a drone.
Read 34 tweets
10 Apr
The first Western book on WWII on the Eastern Front worthy of the name, that is, one that doesn’t (at least in a large degree) parrot Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda (especially the lies contained in the so called “memoirs” of Soviet marshals (the very worst liar being Zhukov)
and does rely on new documents uncovered in Soviet archives during the “period of chaos” (that is, until Putin closed them again), especially by Mark Solonin. Still, it’s already a little dated, does not refer to the lates evidence and curiously believes that Solonin is a
pseudonym (Solonin lives outside Russia, in Estonia I believe, and uses his own name. He now has his own YouTube Chanel, where he has been explaining the history of the construction of the American & Soviet atom bombs (yes, the first Soviet version was entirely based on stolen
Read 5 tweets
9 Apr
Andrei Illarionov "Why Biden's phone call has increased the risk of another Putin offensive". My translation (with some cuts). Part I.
Perhaps dear readers you may not have noticed it yet, but astute political analysts (henceforth known as APA), who had previously announced the beginning of a “new cold war” by the “second Churchill”, have now have announced
the end of the more than seven year Russian-Ukrainian war, and as a result : " On April 2, 2021, the Russian-Ukrainian war ended in an unconditional political defeat for the Russian Federation."
Read 36 tweets
9 Apr
Russia has now demanded that Slovakia returns the Sputnik V vaccine it has supplied to it. You may ask:"why?"
It's because the Slovaks noticed (as I told you here earlier ) that the vaccine is not identical to the one that was tested and described in
Lancet. It's not a joke. Russia really sent to Slovakia "nobody knowswhat" (here is the scene from Heart of a Dog, mentioned by Latynina a long a time ago in connection with the production of Russian vaccine, in which professor Preobrazhensky advises Dr Bormenthal not to drink
Soviet vodka because "God knows what they put into it. What came to their heads..."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!