Now would be a good time for lawmakers to ask FBI Director Wray about the Bureau’s metrics in assessing and responding to left-wing violence vs right-wing violence.
Those metrics would show how politically biased the FBI has become, and how dangerous this is not merely to public confidence in the Bureau, but to the safety of our country.
Lawmakers should ask the FBI how it reacted to protests and violence from the Left and from the Right. FBI should describe the investigative techniques used, what internal classifications the FBI assigned to its investigations (domestic terrorism, criminal, etc.)...
...FBI and other resources (hours, number of personnel, field offices involved) devoted to investigations, numbers of suspects arrested months after the events. Congress should have the FBI provide the number of subpoenas issued, interviews conducted, confidential sources used...
Congress should ask Wray and others how many charges were dropped against Antifa and allies (absolute numbers and percentages) versus charges dropped against those on the Right.
Hint: DOJ dropped many of the very few Portland arrests it made.
Wray should be asked: Did the FBI ever raid an Antifa member's house 3 months after an event and arrest him for trespassing?
Has the FBI ever arrested, and has DOJ ever charged, Antifa and related leftists for trespassing?
Or are such arrests predicated on the suspect's political persuasion?
FBI Assistant Director Jill Sanborn testified to the Senate that the Bureau is making a difference between violent operatives and nonviolent people simply caught up in the January 6 Capitol attack.
Will the latter people be permanently labeled/associated with domestic terrorism?
Answers to these questions will easily show the internal political bias within the FBI, and how the Bureau has strayed from the "integrity" part of its mission.
FBI can fix itself in order not to lose widespread public support, but it's running out of time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @CapitolPolice Inspector General has made devastating findings about the intelligence capabilities of the force.
These findings matter, not only to protect the Capitol, but because the progs are using the Jan 6 attack as an excuse to build a huge domestic spying capability.
2) @CapitolPolice IG: "We also identified intelligence related deficiencies with the Department’s organizational structure, training, professional standards, internal controls, and capability to effectively collect, process, and disseminate intelligence information.”
3) "Despite the inspector general’s findings, Capitol Police officials have defended their intelligence operations at public hearings," @rollcall reports. Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman oversaw the Intelligence & Interagency Coordination Division. She is inept and has to go.
1) Excerpts from my eyewitness account from the West Front of the Capitol on January 6, published in @FDRLST on January 14. They comport with many of the @CapitolPolice IG's findings:
"Capitol Police anti-riot unit prepared early, but presence was light."
2) "When we crossed First Street NW to enter the Capitol grounds where the Capitol Police had jurisdiction, I noticed no police at all."
"that appearance of low threat level made no sense. . . . no Capitol Police appeared anywhere from what we could see . . . ."
Georgetown University "educates" more of our diplomats, intelligence officers and analysts, and other national security professionals than just about any place around. Here's a look at who's teaching them. quillette.com/2021/04/09/geo…
To my Chinese friends - I didn't have space to include the fact that @Georgetown is heavily dependent on cash from Chinese Communist Party-related sources.
Georgetown Law Professor Lama Abu Odeh, of the "Gender Justice Initiative," makes important comments in her "Georgetown's Cultural Revolution" article.
Six years ago, I proposed that Ukraine develop a secret weapon against Russian attack: The ability to take the political & psychological fight into Putin's home turf.
The Obama administration rejected the idea. Ukraine considered it but rejected it also. kyivpost.com/article/opinio…
1) Excerpts from 2015 Kyiv Post article: "Like no other country, non-aligned Ukraine has an untapped capability to defend itself against Russian aggression – with or without support from the West.
"It’s an old idea that doesn’t require guns or bombs."
2) "All that it needs is the will to harness the aggressor’s internal vulnerabilities. While Russia is militarily far stronger than Ukraine, it shows signs of much greater weakness inside its borders."
FBI Assistant Director Jill Sanborn confirms that the FBI's findings "definitely" and "absolutely" agree with what I said in the January 14 @FDRLST article about the Capitol attack.
I never heard of WaPo blogger @AaronBlake before he fabricated his story in late February, but he continues pushing his falsehoods almost a week later.
Former US @CapitolPolice Chief Sund testified that intelligence assessment "indicated that members of the Proud Boys, white supremacist groups, Antifa, and other extremist groups were expected to participate in the the January 6" protest at the Capitol. rules.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
The interagency Daily Intelligence Report on Jan 4 assessed "'the level of probability of acts of civil disobedience/arrests occurring based on current intelligence information' as 'Remote' to 'Improbable' for all of the groups expected to demonstrate" on Jan 6, Sund testified.
Acting @CapitolPolice Chief Pittman testified to Congress that on January 6, she was the "Assistant Chief of Police of the Department's Protective & Intelligence Operations," responsible for the "Intelligence & Interagency Coordination Division (IICD)." docs.house.gov/meetings/AP/AP…