Garrett Johnson Profile picture
Apr 15, 2021 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🤔DO ADS ACTUALLY WORK?🤔
🧵We tackle this question using a large collection of display ad field experiments in a working paper with @EconInformatics & @enub
"The Online Display Ad Effectiveness Funnel & Carryover: Lessons from 432 Field Experiments”
ssrn.com/abstract=27015… 1/8
Recently, the effectiveness of advertising has been called into question. Some of this skepticism is healthy. Measuring the effect of advertising properly is *really* difficult, as I detail here: . 2/ ImageImage
On average, our ad experiments run for 20 days & contain 4M users: 1.6B user-campaign observations in all! Our data come from the 1st months of Google’s Conversion Lift & Brand Lift products, which are powered by our (predicted) ghost ads methodology: doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15… 3/
We measure ad effects on user visits to the advertiser’s website & user conversions: e.g. purchase, sign-up, or download. Our lift estimates compare experimental Treatment users who can see the focal ad & Control users who can not.
% Lift = (Treatment - Control) / Control
4/
We show our site visit estimates (dots) ordered by lift with 95% confidence intervals (whiskers). The median lift is 16.6%. The estimates are noisy, but 85% are positive. Note: we rarely see negative lifts due to industry & academic publication bias. 5/ Image
195 of our 347 site visit estimates are positive & statistically significant (5%, two-sided).
What is the chance that advertising does not work, but we observe 195 of 347 significant estimates?
7.4 * 10^-213. In other words…
6/ Image
We next look at the lift estimates for conversions, which we observe for 184 campaigns. The median lift is 8.1% with 10th & 90th quantiles of -8.9% and 83.4%.
52 of 184 are statistically significant, yielding collective significance of p= 2.9 * 10^-40.
7/ Image
In sum, we contribute some of the strongest evidence that ads actually work. We add to a literature in marketing that seeks to answer this question with multi-advertiser collections of field experiments in various media. FIN Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garrett Johnson

Garrett Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garjoh_canuck

Jun 4
🇮🇹Journeyed to Milan for a marketing conference hosted by @Unibocconi 🇮🇹
A 🧵… Image
First up, Sonja Gensler documents welfare harms of German regulations capping days for AirBnB hosts. This restricts supply, but the good news 😂 is that non-compliance blunts the welfare harm. Marginal effect on long-term rental prices: the intended benefit of the policy…
Image
Image
@michielvancromb introduces a new research agenda on the “Spotify-ification” of the video game industry: consumers increasingly subscribe to a bundle of games, with profound consequences for the market. (And 3 papers!!!)
Image
Image
Read 21 tweets
Dec 21, 2023
🚨Working paper update!🚨

What is the impact of strict #privacy regulation on content supply and demand?

In Sept 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (#COPPA). We use this to study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff. 1/11 Image
Beginning Jan 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting.
This matches FTC's proposed rules to strengthen COPPA announced yesterday: 2/ bit.ly/3RMARdf
Image
YouTube creators worried these changes amounted to the "COPPAcalypse."
We study 5,066 top U.S. YouTube channels by comparing child-directed content creators to their non-child-directed counterparts using a difference-in-differences design. 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
🚨New working paper!🚨

We study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff using the 2019 YouTube COPPA settlement.

"COPPAcalypse? The YouTube settlement’s impact on kids content” w/ @TesaryLin, James Cooper, & Liang Zhong
➡️ ssrn.com/abstract=44303… 1/9 Image
Data sharing increases ad revenue, which pays for free content, & helps personalize websites to better find the content we want. On the other hand, people want more privacy online: especially for kids.
The YouTube settlement shows the consequences of strict privacy regulation. 2/ Image
In Sept. 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (COPPA). Beginning Jan. 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 9, 2023
🧵What have economists learned from the #GDPR?
I review the literature for a future NBER book on the "Economics of #Privacy" edited by @ce_tucker & @avicgoldfarb. 1/7
nber.org/books-and-chap…
Regulators & researchers seek to balance privacy & the data economy. The EU’s #GDPR is a landmark & influential regulation that defines personal data expansively. GDPR establishes:
-rules for data processing,
-rights for EU residents,
-responsibilities for firms, &
-BIG fines. 2/
#GDPR is hard to study:
A) Finding a suitable control group is hard because the GDPR had global spillovers. E.g., it affects EU firms & non-EU firms serving EU residents.
B) GDPR can screw with personal data: e.g., you may only see data from consenting users. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 26, 2022
🧵Explainer for the Topics API 🧵
Google announced the Topics API for Privacy Sandbox🏖️. Topics is basically FLoC v2.0. Google is deftly replacing FLoC v1 with a more anodyne technology and name...
Details: developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-s…
1/8
Topics allows for interest-based ads without 3rd party cookies. Most research, including our own, shows ad prices are 2-3X higher with cookies.
Put concretely: Interest-based ads help fund content that is socially valuable, but uninteresting to advertisers. 2/ Image
In Topics, the browser classifies begins by classifying the sites that users visit into topics from a list of ~350 readable & benign topics like cats🐈 or hockey🏒.
To do so, sites must opt in and users can opt out. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 13, 2021
Thread explaining FLEDGE (formerly TURTLEDOVE).
Online advertising generates value for publishers, advertisers, & users. Now, Google & others are proposing alternatives that preserve this value while better protecting user privacy under the "Privacy Sandbox" proposals. 1/12
The public discussion of #PrivacySandbox is dominated by #FLoC, but many tech solutions are required to satisfy advertising use cases while protecting privacy. In particular, #FLEDGE propose more fundamental & interesting changes to the status quo. 2/
The key to FLEDGE is to move user targeting information onto the *browser*, rather than broadcasting a cookie ID to the adtech ecosystem so advertisers can bid on ad opportunities based on what they know about that cookie ID. The prototypical FLEDGE use-case is retargeting. 3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(