1) @iearnfinance TVL crossed $3B. This is a big milestone. It grounds Yearn's 1st place in the competition between yield aggregators - amazing achievement taking into account that it's the only protocol which doesn't incentivize TVL by issuance of its native token $YFI.
2) With hindsight, I think that distribution of total $YFI supply in a single farming event last summer was a big hurdle for the development of the protocol. How can you compete with others who fork your code and add token issuance on top of it to increase APY for users?
3) Yet, this lack of $YFI inflation led @iearnfinance to the place where they are today. They had to be creative to offer competitive returns for depositors. Let's summarize what they did.
4) Firstly, they invented Backscratcher vault to incentivize users to lock their $CRV in @iearnfinance. It created a moat - Yearn has a lot of $CRV locked in Curve which boosts $CRV rewards for their strategies.
5) Other protocols simply can't get such high APYs from $CRV farming as Yearn without locking a substantial amount of $CRV in Curve. A really substantial amount. Currently Yearn has 11M $CRV locked!
6) Secondly, they offered generous incentives for strategy builders to work for Yearn. Yearn collects 2% management fee on assets held in the vaults and 20% performance fee on profits generated by strategies. Half of performance fee (so 10% of profits) goes to strategists.
7) A strategist is a person with skills to develop an automated strategy which generates profits. This person could work solo, for competitors or for Yearn. Economic incentives determine their choice. 10% of profits generated on huge TVL in Yearn vaults are very encouraging.
8) That's why big brains want to work for Yearn, create profitable strategies, bring more TVL and earn more. More TVL means more profits for the protocol too. This is a symbiotic relationship between Yearn and strategists. Big brains collection is another Yearn's moat.
9) Thirdly, they found a smart way to use protocol profits. At the beginning profits were shared among $YFI stakers but it was a bit wasteful. Therefore, 99.5% of $YFI holders who particiated in the voting decided to adopt BABY - Buyback And Build Yearn. What does it mean?
10) Protocol profits are used to buy back $YFI in the open market and utilize it as incentives for Yearn contributors or any other initiatives which can benefit Yearn ecosystem: security audits, bug bounties, grants, gas reimbursement, development overhead, etc.
11) As in any start-up at early stage of development, profits are re-invested to drive growth. But BABY is also a way of transferring $YFI from weak hands to strong hands. Contributors usually believe in the project they work for, therefore, they should hold $YFI with conviction.
12) In my recent tweet I wasn't convinced how growing TVL would affect $YFI price because market is mostly driven by speculation and sentiment. But today I realised that it all adds up and 1 $YFI = 4 $BTC is not really an unreasonable expectation.
1) Yesterday a new farm appeared on Ethereum: app.thisistheway.finance. It doesn't even matter what it is. The most important fact is that it rewards farmers with a token $BAG for staking $ETH, $WBTC, $USDC or $DAI. So it's passive earning opportunity.
2) "But sir, it's a new farm, it must be risky!" Is it? The farming contract is a slightly modified version of MasterChef - a well known and battle-tested contract on Ethereum. The only change is that it applies an exit fee on your stake if you leave early.
1) It's been a while since my last bullish thread on $BNT but @Bancor Team keeps building and it deserves some commentary. Let's talk about a new addition to $BNT tokenomics, Vortex Burner, which puts deflationary pressure on circulating supply of $BNT.
2) Let's start with a quick reminder how @Bancor works. In contrast to other AMMs like $UNI or $SUSHI, in Bancor, you can provide liquidity with a single token. You don't have to pool your token with other asset which often leads to impermanent loss (IL).
3) Whitelisted pools in Bancor are fully protected from IL. It works by bundling an array of pools into one bucket. Some pools have high IL, others don't and fees they generate are used for IL compensation. It shifts IL from single-pool risk to a risk spread across many pools.
1) I really like experiments. Especially the ones which can disrupt what we are currently used to. DeFi is the best example - an attempt to disrupt TradFi with a code. AMMs are already disrupting centralized exchanges and constantly evolve. What about the final form of AMM?
2) This is what @IntegralHQ tries to achieve - the final form of AMM, the one that eats other exchanges' liquidity. Sounds like a dream, doesn't it? So let's dive into it deeper. It's complex and I won't pretend I fully understand all the technical docs but I'll try to ELI5.
3) How will @IntegralHQ suck in all the liquidity? Technically it won't. But it will act as if it would have. This is due to its unique combination of AMM with orderbook (OB-AMM design). It allows them to mirror liquidity from other exchanges to become the cheapest one to trade.
1) While I, as active liquidity provider, am excited about sophisticated options for LPs in $UNI v3, I'm also concerned that too much complexity will only serve few in the know and leave the majority of (passive) LPs behind.
2) Although I haven't conducted a survey to justify my thesis, I'm quite convinced that the majority of current LPs don't actively manage their pools. This is based on my observations and pushed me to share a set of "advanced" strategies for active LPs:
3) Uni v3 feature to provide liquidity only for a given range (+ other options) will be useful for professional market makers who will likely eat lunch of passive LPs. If passive LPs earn less, they may look for alternative simple solutions.
1) What is the most popular term in DeFi which you have never heard of in traditional world? Probably aping but let's assume it's impermanent loss (IL). Every liquidity provider in AMM suffered from IL. But do you know that you can beat it? Read this thread to find out how.
2) Let's start with a quick definition of IL. It's a difference in value between your current assets in liquidity pool (LP) and assets you would have if you hadn't added them to LP. In other words:
IL = current assets at current prices - initial assets at current prices
3) Why current assets are different than initial assets? Because this is how AMM works - each trade changes the amount of both tokens (x and y) in LP so that their product remains constant (x*y=k). It's like automatic rebalancing of your portfolio consisting of tokens x and y.
1) If you don't like reading long blog posts with project updates but prefer to get a bullish thread with a summary of news pumping your favourite token, I'm here to serve. It's $BNT time again after the March release of Bancor Progress Update. blog.bancor.network/bancor-progres…
2) "In the last month, the total value locked in the Bancor Protocol has more than doubled, exceeding $1.6 billion. Bancor broke into the top 10 projects by TVL and now generates the fifth highest revenue of any protocol on Ethereum." - no commentary is needed - bullish $BNT.
3) $BNT circulating supply reported by CoinGecko & CoinMarketCap is overstated. When you deposit single-sided liquidity, @Bancor mints BNT into the pool to match it. This BNT is protocol-owned, largely remains in the pool earning fees and is eventually burned.