Biden says his conversation with Putin earlier this week was candid and respectful.
Despite all the problems and antagonisms, Biden making a point to demonstrate a lot of respect for Russia as a nation and for the Russian people in his remarks.
Biden: The US not looking to kick off a cycle of escalation with Russia
Biden says he proposed to Putin that they meet for a summit this summer in Europe, and teams exploring that. Seeking a dialogue on strategic stability
Biden: Now is the time to deescalate.
Biden: indicated we would talk about it, (to q, did Putin give him any indication would change behavior).
Biden said he told Putin he hoped we could work out a modus viviendi
Biden said he has always opposed Nord Stream II, but indicates the issue of sanctions regarding it are complicated.
refers repeatedly to “President Putin”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵”PM Andrej Babis said Czech authorities had ‘clear evidence’ linking GRU officers to an explosion in an ammunition warehouse in 2014 which left two people dead.
‘We have good reason to suspect the involvement of GRU officers from unit 29155 in the explosion at the ammunition
Some of the reporting in this is astonishing, and one has to wonder if Trump's plan to install Patel as CIA dep director/acting director in December was linked to the advice he was getting on how to stage a coup washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
How does this relate to Trump's efforts at the time to overturn the election, one wonders
"On Dec. 12, while Trump was attending the Army-Navy football game, he discussed with top aides a sensitive future assignment for Patel, one person recalled." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Looking at the WH pool reports from Trump's travel to the Army Navy game on Dec. 12. "POTUS was followed by White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, WH personnel director John McEntee, & DNI John Ratcliffe (who was also seen milling about outside the South Portico shortly before
EU official said he expects the talks in Vienna to go on for a few more days. And then he thinks two most relevant delegations will go back home to consult capitals for further instructions. We are reaching a point when decision capacity is back to the capitals.
He said of the apparent attack on Natanz and subsequent Iran decision to start 60% enrichment between the talks last week and this week: So these two issues make the negotiations a bit more difficult, but at the same time make it more urgent and important.
EU official: not exactly aware of how far along they are, but "the one thing is that we are closer than last week. This is definitely the case."
“Beute — whose ordeal triggered some of the events that followed — said he believes fallout from the case could force a reckoning for the lax oversight and clubby nature of Florida’s political system.”
“Emails from 2018 show that Greenberg agreed to put his name on an op-ed, which aides to Gaetz had been circulating among themselves, defending the congressman for inviting a Holocaust denier to Trump’s State of the Union address that year.” washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
So satisfying and rare to see the little guy smeared by dirty trickster scumbags get justice for once
Both the Iran FM, directly, and the US, tacitly/indirectly, linked suspected suspected sabotage op to the diplomatic track to revive the Iran deal gathering momentum: diplomatic.substack.com/p/us-disowning…
On Wednesday—a day after the strategic dialogue with the Israelis—the Biden admin plans to resume Iran nuclear talks in Vienna. “Our focus is, of course, on the diplomatic path forward,” the White House’s Psaki said. “So that’s where our focus is.” diplomatic.substack.com/p/us-disowning…
reading this, as a reporter who deals with the constraints of background and off record source demands, worry this piece risks being used for propaganda. the intel officials in third graph seem to be israeli but do not agree to be id as such
sorry, 4th graf. but concern is same. israeli officials trying to launder propaganda into western media to seem like other western officials sourcing and therefore legitimating it
I don’t see why @nytimes is comfortable with being the vehicle for this, meant to look to readers like it may have US official sourcing but is more likely unidentified Israeli sourcing/possibly propaganda