I clicked "Translate Tweet". It gave me:
"We hope that by planting a few trees we can greenwash our ecocidal business model and trip people into believing we're a force for good."
"We hope that by planting a few trees we can greenwash our ecocidal business model and trip people into believing we're a force for good."
https://twitter.com/bp_plc/status/1383048150051590148
Incidentally, what in God's name are @Natures_Voice and @WoodlandTrust doing in partnership with this planetary death machine?
It's a classic example of how conservation groups, dazzled by corporate power and money, lose their moral compass.
Good spot by @andyheald
It's a classic example of how conservation groups, dazzled by corporate power and money, lose their moral compass.
Good spot by @andyheald
Which part of "greenwash" do these organisations not understand? And why should we continue to support them when they become a PR vehicle for fossil fuel companies?
I see this moral drift, cowardice and corruption of purpose throughout the conservation sector. Seaspiracy exposed it among marine organisations (and there's a lot more of that story to tell). But I'm sorry to say that the terrestrial ones are just as compromised.
Look, it's really simple.
You don't take money from fossil companies
You don't launch projects funded by fossil fuel companies
You don't allow fossil fuel companies to use your name
You don't help them greenwash their image
... if you want to retain a shred of credibility.
You don't take money from fossil companies
You don't launch projects funded by fossil fuel companies
You don't allow fossil fuel companies to use your name
You don't help them greenwash their image
... if you want to retain a shred of credibility.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
