The asymmetric power of sarkar over society and markets is the weakest link in our fight against Covid. Governments are used to not treating citizens and businesses as peers, but solving large, complex problems requires such a relationship.
Since governments prefer a 'we know everything' stance, they are the most who have to answer for the current situation. Broadly, we have to conclude that whatever is happening is mainly the result of the government's handling of the pandemic.
That's usually acceptable to governments because they don't need to worry about catastrophic outcomes, and they can get by with slow and minor interventions. In the face of a pandemic, however, slow and steady can only get us buried before the race is over.
That's why they're now playing 'pass the parcel' among the themselves to see how to place the responsibility for failure in someone else's lap. While they normally make common cause among themselves against the public, now it's each one for himself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We're paying a heavy price to covid because we don't have meaningful district govts. In large countries, between state and local govts, it is common to have a county / district layer too. We go from an over-bearing and low-capacity state to small town councils and panchayats.
States are stretched to respond to all problems, everywhere. Local councils and panchayats cannot see beyond the end of their few streets. The taluk and districe-scale view of things, and the necessary response, is simply left blank.
The administration of state and central schemes in districts is left in the hands of (mostly) young IAS officers, who must somehow command the respect of long-serving and therefore experienced state cadre who can never aspire to the top jobs themselves.
The 'per capita income' goal in @AamAadmiParty Delhi budget is a good public target. The simple promise is - the people of Delhi will become much richer, measurably, each year that AAP is in power. Each year, the annual outcomes budget can report on progress to this goal.
AAP has created a positive feedback logic for Delhi Budgets. Public goods and services are provided properly, which means the people don't have to spend their own money for these. They use it instead to spend on other things, which drives local economy and tax revenues.
The 30,000 crores Budget when AAP took over is now at nearly 70,000 crores. And even in a pandemic, the revenue estimates are comfortable enough to allow continuing high investment in health, education, and other public goods.
Volunteers and civic authorities clearing black spots of garbage often brings a lot of cheer to local residents, and in the media too. A lot of people in civil society groups have participated in such efforts at least once. But the spots recur - as we've always known they would.
The real challenge is to prevent such spots from forming in the first place. And this is a considerably harder task than clearing it for a few days after enough people have complained and endured its stench and sight. Endless beautification hasn't nudged the ball towards that.
The reason is simple. There is a political economy around garbage, and it can only be defeated by perpetual engagement from citizens. Anything that is temporary on the part of citizens is known to be temporary in the political economy too, and it's simple to wait that out.
The pandemic has hurt a lot of children's education, but it's also done one other thing that was long overdue - it has left govt education departments with a much smaller role to play than previously, as more parents begin to look for and accept alternate paths to learning.
Most parents still look forward to the reopening of schools, I'm sure, but their expectations from the schools are bound to have shifted during the pandemic. The most important of these is the sense that physical infrastructure is only a small part of how children learn.
A second shift is the recognition that schools are not the only place to learn. They've always seemed like the natural place to learn, to a lot of people, but if that natural order is disturbed as violently as it is now, there's no choice but to start looking for alternatives.
Across the world, politicians who built rickety public health systems that allowed a full-blown pandemic are offering voters free and locally-made vaccines. It would have been infinitely better to have leaders who wouldn't have landed the world in this soup in the first place.
It should be an easy choice. What would you rather have - a made-in-your-country vaccine for covid, or no virus to worry about in the first place? But the day-to-day machinations of politics converts even a pandemic into a silly soundbite contests.
In a few weeks, we'll probably become the country with the most Covid cases in the world. We'll tell ourselves that's because we have a lot of people, so we should expect higher numbers on everything. But that will just be the excuse of the moment. The truth is a lot worse.
Political promises of a 'free vaccine' are no big deal. There is simply no way to roll it out effectively if it is not free. No matter who makes the decision, it will have to be free to have any chance of being useful. Promises of more jobs, OTOH, are worth examining closely.
This is now a common promise in elections. "We'll CREATE more jobs." Mostly, the promise is not linked to any policy for job creation. It's simply stated as a promise, and repeated. That's unfortunate, because there is a lot that can actually be done to enable more employment.
Or more correctly, there is a lot that can be done to improve livelihoods. This distinction is important, because the the number of educational and training institutions that provide paths to 'employment' in the conventional sense is too small to serve even 10% of the population.