Great maps. They give a guide to the revealed preferences of social fabric of various cities. Further they make a good proxy for when a country industrialized. The more recent the industrialization, the more skyscrapers.
At least in Germany and the Netherlands, the absence of skyscrapers is policy. After WW2 as devastated cities were rebuilt there were fears of an Americanization of the continent.
In Central Europe skyscrapers were never built, but arguably despite careful reconstruction, Americanization happened.
Today outlying villages and small towns are slowly evolving into car reliant suburbs. A phenomena seen in Eastern Europe as well!
It is interesting that population density isn't the determining factor for presence or absence of skyscrapers. Belgium and the Netherlands are very dense for example.
After industrialization, and anti-skyscrapers policy, it seems presence of finance is the next most important factor. Finance seems to demand towers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After a bad breakup, I remember quipping to a friend who asked what I had learned from the experience: "Insecure attachment."
It was interesting to try and work through that over the years. It got better, but only after two years of frankly erratic behavior. I was hurting badly.
Ultimately I think I came out stronger. I appreciate the maturity, but not how I got there. I jokingly compared it to a different friend to learning to meditate in a full body cast. You might think meditation is useful, but no you aren't grateful to the truck.
Worth reading this post on Voltaire and Coffee. One of my pet theories is that societies tend to morph when exposed to new drugs.
1/n
After a period of adaptation a culture becomes resistant to the social effects of a drug. All remaining organizations and ideologies become resistant to whatever noise that drug introduced into their system.
2/n
An analogy can be made to antibiotic resistant bacteria. Chinese and Mediterranean society grew wine-proof by the Iron Age. Coffee had a rampage in the 18th century. Hard liquor was still giving the Russians and Irish severe social problems in the 19th century.
3/n
Western society has nearly completely lost the infrastructure that could support complex thinking.
To dig into the relevant infrastructure:
1. A culture open to voicing accurate observations about itself. Every capable thinker voices these early in life before they learn better, if this disqualifies them, the culture cannot support original thinkers.
2. Viable economic niches. Academia is much too contested. Silicon Valley allows for some original thinking, but the thinking isn't what provides returns.
Great reading list! Some of the more eclectic tastes on Twitter. Highly recommend following @miltonwrites for his threads if you yourself don’t read as many books as you should!
It’s also always worth reading old books, not just for the information within them, but to absorb something of the mindset and worldview of people long gone. It is its own kind of information.
Intellectual history is rewritten every time there is a significant shift in political and economic power.
1/n
Voltaire and other 18th century writers took it upon themselves to rewrite recent scientific history. They elevated Galileo and Newton while downplaying the credit both of these thinkers gave to Hellenistic predecessors.
2/n
Rather than triumphant adherents of a revived tradition of knowledge, Galileo and Newton's breakthroughs were recast as triumphs of pure individual reason.
They of course are also such triumphs, but Newton had good reason to insist he stood on the shoulders of giants.
3/n