I just gave a talk on what we learn from the History of the Second Amendment to Lift Every Voice Oregon and The Youth Leadership Academy to end gun violence.
I will have an audio recording to post. Meanwhile . . .
The talk is too long for a Twitter thread (35 minutes plus questions!) but I can put a few takeaways here.
What do we learn from studying the history of the Second Amendment?
First, there have always been gun control laws . . .
. . . there were gun control laws in the U.S. before the ratification of the Second Amendment and immediately after. The idea that the Second Amendment was intended to allow unfettered access to guns is therefore nonsensical.
Second, the history of the Second Amendment is steeped in our racist past. Militias at the time were used (mostly) to police enslaved populations. The Second Amendment was written by slaveowners to protect the institution of slavery. The history of gun laws . . .
. . . is also steeped in our racist past. Finally, the idea on which the Second Amendment was based (citizen militias) has no relevance (obviously) in the twenty-first centery.
The "things haven't changed in the past 100 years" argument is just as faulty as "we no longer have racial segregation, so racism is no longer a problem."
First, it discounts the incredible changes that have taken place and the hard work that has gone into bringing them about.
Second, the patriarchy that existed in the 19th and early 20th was put in place and maintained by laws that legalized slavery, then created Jim Crow, and laws excluding women from the professions.
So yeah, it's not the same today.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last night, @HC_Richardson ended her thought-provoking letter by asking this:
"Last month, six in ten Republicans in a Reuters/Ipsos poll said they believed the election was stolen. Where do Republican lawmakers think this is going to end?"
1/
Heather Cox Richardson is the author of⤵️, so the question comes from someone with a deep knowledge of party history.
It seems to me that the GOP leaders have no long-term plan, and no long-range ideas or visions.
They have a short-term plan: Win at any cost and hold power.
2/
Scholar @jasonintrator defines fascism as a set of tactics for seizing and maintaining power."
The fascist wants power. They do what it takes to achieve that power.
It comes from cynicism: They think everyone is out for power.
3/
We need to divide the people responsible for the attack into two groups:
🔹The thugs who carried out the attack
🔹The leaders who didn't actually storm the capital, but who either aided with the planning or in some way enabled the attack.
To summarize, this case is bad for Trump for a whole bunch of reasons.
🔹First, the plaintiffs sustained actual injuries . . .
2/
Some of these tort cases are a bit weak because the plaintiffs have a hard time showing why they should have standing to sue. (Also, these are particularly sympathetic plaintiffs.)
🔹The facts are bad for Trump. The facts in this case are devastating.
3/