Wow! For the first time, a video showing the ISIS leader defending his PhD thesis at the university of Mosul in 2007. This is the first time he’s seen in live footage, and the discussion in the video is quite astonishing in multiple levels. (H/t @NihadJariri)

1/
As detailed here, at that point he was part of al-Qaeda in Iraq (Islamic State of Iraq) and was just appointed the general sharii (judge) of the group. He would be jailed by the Americans at Camp Bucca a short while later.
So according to @newlinesmag reporting, he became the group’s top cleric at the same time he defended his PhD at the University of Mosul.

His PhD dedication was brought up in the video here. “Dedicated to those whose nature is to work behind the scenes & in the dark.” Al-Qaeda?
ISIS leader clearly is thrown off when asked why he suspiciously dedicated his PhD to those who work in the dark. He kept mumbling or changing his answer & then said he meant his teachers. When they asked him why he didn’t mention his teachers if so, he didn’t want to go long..
ISIS leader’s PhD was about an 8th-century manuscript of the Hanafi school of jurisprudence (Iraq’s official Sunni school, and the earliest & the most progressive of Sunni schools, generally). Astonishing because ISIS subscribes to (a twisted/extreme version of) Hanbalism.
He says he didn’t want to do his PhD on anything contemporary & wanted to revive traditions, again astonishingly referring favorably to Sufi master Abdulqader al-Jilani (of one of the 2 dominant Sufi orders in Iraq & Syria). The academics even thought his dedication meant Sufism.
Separately, I’ve found he was also awarded ikazat (traditional licenses, through religious learning lineage) from multiple clerics, including a religious teacher at the Mosul university. One was in 2003 in aqli/naqli knowledge (revelation/scripture & human/scholastic knowledge).
In any case, the current ISIS leader was clearly putting an act when he was defending his PhD at the University of Mosul in 2007. Pretending to be mainstream accepting things his group stands against, to attain mainstream credentials. He was already a top cleric in al-Qaeda then.
Actually you can find plenty on the internet about his credentials since early 2000s. Here it mentions one of the clerics who gave him an ijazah in 2003. That cleric preached at the Furqan Mosque, where Qardash's father preached for 18 years.
When ISIS first announced the new leader, the release mentioned he was a longstanding jihadist and a cleric with proper credentials. Judging from the details here, and how he speaks, he seems he went through traditional religious training, *sounding* more so than Baghdadi was.
Note the video was of him defending his PhD, unclear if he was actually awarded one. From the existing information about Mosul university records, no proof he received PhD. Which is funny, because the video is all about the academics destroying him. They point out basic errors.
OK there may be an interesting/useful story behind his PhD idea: given the college's inclinations and Qardash's ideology years before that discussion, it's quite possible even that PhD thesis wasn't... his. During the chaos of war, who knows, he could've "stumbled" on it.
Nothing in his ideology (he'd been involved in jihadism many years before) indicated he'd go a PhD on that kind of topic. From the discussion, the content seemed characteristically Sufi. The committee even accused him of sounding like a Hallaj follower.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hassan Hassan

Hassan Hassan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hxhassan

21 Dec 20
Today is the death anniversary of Dr Mohammed Shahrour, a Syrian intellectual known for his controversial views on Islam (radical but on the opposite spectrum of jihadism). He came up with a novel way of approaching the Quran, widely rejected by clerics but fascinating at times.
To me, the most fascinating is that he came up with a method that's almost identical to Islamic radicals but in a way that pushes a liberal view of Islam, different from traditional & extremist views. A "literalist" view with modern applications.
While progressives usually focus on avoiding what they see as odd statements in Islamic texts by going for maqasid (the higher objectives of sharia, specified in hadiths) or majaz (metaphorical explanations), he embraced literalism and found a method to explain things.
Read 7 tweets
18 Dec 20
Even as it tries to do the right thing, @nytimes falls short. Who has a history of misrepresentation that the NYT has avoided specifying?

The Times said its investigation had “found a history of misrepresentations by Mr. Chaudhry”

nytimes.com/2020/12/18/bus…
Really? After months of investigation, the paper found the interviewee is to blame? Apart from the rhetoric, it really merely walked back on its earlier decision to still use the podcast but edit it. Now it’s saying no, we’ll retract it, and everyone is supposed to applaud.
For an brief on what is the real trouble here, follow this thread (
[the problem is much deeper, it’s systemic & there are real-life effects to journalism led by ignorance + arrogance, despite repeated warnings of the damages it had caused.]
Read 5 tweets
2 Dec 20
Important: A breakthrough in the Gulf rift in the coming hours, sources tell Al Jazeera aja.me/b5k8f
Kuwait is to issue a statement about a "breakthrough" in the Gulf rift, between Saudi Arabia & Qatar. The breakthrough will be a set of confidence-building measures before a full end of the crisis that began June 2017. Moves to resolve the Saudi-Qatari dispute started last fall.
The gist of it: the imminent breakthrough is to allow Qatari flights over Saudi Arabia, which the US hopes will rattle Iran’s economy. Currently Qatar pays millions of dollars to route over Iran.

nytimes.com/2020/12/02/wor…
Read 5 tweets
6 Nov 20
Doom & gloom within Arab regime circles about reports of a Biden win. They were hoping Trump would win.

Even if they don’t think Biden would actively be against them, they get how their detractors will have space & multiple advantages perhaps unprecedented in recent decades!
In 2016, it was a whole different world: Arab dictators and their circles were simply intoxicated with their love of the incoming Trump presidency. They saw historic opportunities, and they were right to a certain degree but not entirely.
These regimes will always have friends in DC but things, and they may think their puppets are doing a great job at placing op-eds or forming partnerships here & there; but there are parallel things happening both inside the US & when it comes to their detractors they can’t stop.
Read 12 tweets
18 Oct 20
Two weeks before the anniversary of the killing of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdad, ISIS is releasing a new statement from the media outlet specializing in top leadership releases.

The new leader Abu Ibrahim al-Hashemi has not yet made a public statement: cgpolicy.org/articles/exclu…
ISIS releases a statement by its spokesman Abu Hamza al-Qurashi titled "So recount the tales"
In the first 5 minutes, he speaks about the Salafist tenet "obedience to rulers" and attacks it as un-Islamic. He also talks about clerics that preach against rebelling against rulers.

[A key part of why jihadism is part of a theological revolution, just a violent version]
Read 16 tweets
25 Sep 20
Wow, super embarrassing! This story was the basis of a whole series produced by the NYT, the "award-winning" Caliphate.

The sad thing is: it's not the 1st time @rcallimachi falls into fake stories. This could be avoided by having someone able to vet sources & spot discrepancies
Last October, she ran an article with claims that anybody who knows this subject would immediately dismiss as implausible. As we found out, it was based on faked documents supplied by dodgy sources.
More damning (if we put the lack of expertise aside) is that she misrepresented quotes by an expert to make it sound like he was vouching for their veracity, even though he'd raised concerns.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!