Waiting on peer reviews might be the most torturous part of publishing a scholarly book. Here are a few things you should know about them to prepare yourself if you’re waiting for yours to come in right now:
Your editor may or may not frame the reviews for you. Sometimes they do, sometimes they just send them. If at all possible, try to have a phone convo with your ed abt the reviews so you can get real talk on what they think of them and what they think is most impt to address
Remember that the reviewers don’t have the final say on anything. They make recommendations, not decisions. Your response—explaining how you’ll address criticisms if there are any—goes a long way in the publication decision (which, again, is not made by the reviewers)
Your response doesn’t need to show that the reviewers’ criticisms are invalid. You need to show that you will produce a publishable book. That means explaining how you will *use* the reviews to plot your revisions
You don’t have to do everything the reviewers suggest. But don’t dwell on why their suggestion is bad. Focus your response on the spirit of the review and how you will move forward.
You also don’t have to address every single thing in the reviews when you respond. Focus on big picture stuff or things they were really emphatic about.
Keep in mind that your “response to the peer reviews” is not a response directly to the peer reviewERS. It’s for your editor, other staff at your publisher, and the editorial board, who are the actual people who will decide if your project is a good bet for publication
One last thing: tone matters. You might feel affronted by the reviews but that won’t get you anywhere w/ the decision-makers. I’m not saying you can’t be mad at Reviewer 2, but use your response to create a positive feeling about your future book, not to settle a score
If the reviews are so bad that you feel they’re disrespectful or even offensive, bring it up to your editor. Hopefully they’ll let you vent and see where you’re coming from. You can still make the response a positive, productive exercise, even if you’re mad
Oh AND this will be covered in Chapter 12 of THE BOOK PROPOSAL BOOK plus there will be a sample response letter (written by one of my awesome clients) for you to use as a model if you need one
The title “Editor” has become central to my professional identity over the past several years but I recently took it out of my bio on here bc I think I’m in a bit of an existential shift and focusing on other ways to support academic/scholarly authors, at least for right now
I think I’ll write a newsletter soon on the differences between editing, consulting, and coaching, and what you as an author might be looking for that would lead you to one of those types of helpers
I still do editing for many of my clients. But I think I want new people to understand that I can help in other ways. My old friends on here can still call me an editor ☺️
I know people (rightly) have other things on their mind at the moment, but if you’d like to hold space for writing your scholarly book proposal this summer, my Book Proposal Accelerator will run from June 4 to July 22. Enrollment opens May 1 at courses.manuscriptworks.com
How to choose a publisher when you think your book could fit at multiple places?
One thing to think abt is the audiences you’re most keen to reach. Which press has the best reputation among the people you *most* want to read your book?
The people you care most about reaching might be people in your home field or subfield. For ex, if you’re going up for tenure & need to “make an impact” in the field of your home dept, you might decide to pick the press that looks best to yr senior colleagues. But—
Maybe you’ve written an interdisciplinary book and you’re already pretty well connected & visible in one of the fields yr intervening in. In that case maybe go for a press that has the visibility & marketing channels in the field you’re less known in but want to be respected in
It's totally normal for academic book writers to struggle w/ organizing their material into chapters that make sense and propel readers thru the book. It's tricky when yr trying to revise a diss & maybe equally tricky when yr on a 2nd book w/o a pre-existing structure in place
What isn't super compelling, structurally, is dividing the book up into 4-5 case studies & just showing how yr main argument or concept plays out in each case. Why wd a reader spend sustained time w/ yr bk if they can get the gist from just 1 chapter? Here's how to do it better:
The 4-5 case studies or research sites/objects isn't the problem. It's that each successive one should show the reader something new, something that enhances or complicates the concept or thesis introduced in the first chapter
This week’s newsletter covered some of the salient differences between scholarly publishers & trade publishers
Quick answer comes down to audiences & sales channels. Trade presses sign books they think will sell widely via retail. Schol presses less likely to stress mass appeal
There are scholarly presses that are not-for-profit (e.g. university presses) and scholarly presses that are “commercial” or for-profit.
Commercial is not synonymous with “trade”
Trade = sold to retailers at a deep discount in hopes of getting books placed on shelves and in front of a broad audience of readers.
Not-for-profit presses may decide to market some books as trade titles, if they see sales potential
Because this is always a burning question for first-time academic book authors, here are some red flags that the book you’re proposing hasn’t yet evolved away from the dissertation:
🚩 You’re trying to make all the claims and cover all possible aspects of your topic.
Compelling books usually make one main argument and see that argument through multiple angles or layers in the chapters. They don’t exhaust all possible interest areas of a given subject
🚩 You’re still focusing inward on the specific procedures and findings of your research.
You do need to communicate what you found and how, but it should be in the interest of illuminating some broader dynamic in the world, because that’s what readers will care most about