Share this page!

G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
Twitter logo
19 Apr, 6 tweets, 2 min read
.@Nate_Cohn is right that “sectarianism” (what we have been calling “negative partisanship, “affective polarization,” “tribalism” &c for a while) is a threat to democracy — I just don’t think it’s the same threat posed by the radicalization of the GOP, esp on electoral democracy
See here
And here
And here gelliottmorris.substack.com/p/how-illibera…
And here wired.com/story/polariza…
/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with G. Elliott Morris

G. Elliott Morris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gelliottmorris

G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
20 Apr
Ackshually, the only “good” “compromise” is to retro-retrocede Alexandria and Arlington back into DC then grant residents statehood, that way Rs have a higher chance of winning senate seats in VA but DC residents get what they want
Make Delaware Pennsylvania Again
Read 7 tweets
G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
18 Apr
New Reuters/Ipsos poll finds 63% of adults want to establish age or term limits on Supreme Court justices. Given the poll also finds expanding the size of the court is unpopular, this should be the Democrats’ new position on reform

reuters.com/business/legal…
The trouble with this (the quoted tweet) is that Ds can’t just pack & “move on.” I think 4 new justices is a great idea! I also happen to think it will basically ensure Republicans win control of the federal government in 2024. Seems like something Dems would want to avoid
Ok, fair enough. Ds could spend a whole lot of time & effort trying to convince voters that packing is fine, with a high chance that it’ll backfire tremendously. Or they could try to start a movement for something that 65-75% of voters support & focus on other parts of the agenda
Read 4 tweets
G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
16 Apr
NEW: 46% of Republicans in our YouGov/The Economist poll this week said that the MLB's decision to move the All Star game out of GA would cause them to watch less or no baseball. 16% of Democrats said the same — and 21% said it'll make them watch more!

docs.cdn.yougov.com/wvjmyy0dlk/eco… Image
People are pretty bad at gauging how events will impact their behavior, so I don't know how accurate these aggregate numbers are, but the partisan differences are pretty striking.
I'm not quite sure what the line is between expressive responding and pavlovian partisanship, but we're nearing it
Read 4 tweets
G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
15 Apr
Perceptions of the safety of the J&J covid-19 vaccine...

..before CDC recommended a pause on shots:
Safe - 52%
Unsafe - 26%

...after CDC recommendation:
Safe - 37% (-15)
Unsafe - 39% (+13)

today.yougov.com/topics/politic…
Unfortunately no, only J&J
What I'm super curious about is this chart...

If I take the Economist/YouGov poll, sale the J&J safe/unsafe question as a scale from -2 to 2, and then plot the trend over the course of the poll, there seems to be a large dip on Monday too. Any ideas?

Read 10 tweets
G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
14 Apr
These Monmouth approval crosstabs match YouGov's almost exactly, but M's topline number is about 4-5 percentage points higher than YG's. This fits a broader pattern of party/vote-unweighted data being better for Biden that makes me think partisan nonresponse is still pretty high.
To restate the tweet: I am worried that polling aggregates are overestimating Biden's approval rating just like they overestimated his vote share last November
I thought it could be a mode effect, but I think this has to do with weighting, given that the party-weighted Civiqs data is also less favorable to Biden but other online polls aren't. I'm not saying 100% but this fits the narrative
Read 5 tweets
G. Elliott Morris Profile picture
12 Apr
This is the “elections have consequences” graph
I meant this as more of a state government capacity tweet, not a “Biden is sending vaccines only to blue states” tweet
Good point! Just clearing things up for other people :)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @gelliottmorris has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @gelliottmorris!

Read all threads by @gelliottmorris