Second phase of #SpyCopsInquiry hearings, covering 1972 to 1982, due to begin this morning at 10am.
Eight former #spycops set to testify in this phase.
Meanwhile, third phase of hearings, when #spycops managers are due to be called, DELAYED from October to first half of 2022.
David Barr, counsel to #SpyCopsInquiry, says that evidence to be heard in this phase of hearings will require inquiry chairman to consider whether there are grounds to believe that activities of #spycops led to specific miscarriages of justice.
Sir John Mitting, #SpyCopsInquiry chairman, plans to consider whether to make any referral of possible miscarriages of justice to a special panel to make determinations after this phase of hearings, David Barr says.
Theresa May in 2015 set up this miscarriages of justice panel alongside #SpyCopsInquiry.
Made up of senior members of CPS and police, it will review cases where inquiry believes miscarriages of justice may have taken place because of a #spycops op or its non disclosure.
David Barr says that this phase of #SpyCopsInquiry will hear evidence of at least five #spycops who had sexual relationships with at least 12 spying targets.
Some of these #spycops who had sexual relations with targets will be testifying behind closed doors to protect their identities, David Barr tells #SpyCopsInquiry hearing.
David Barr to #SpyCopsInquiry: “It can safely be said that from the mid-1970’s onwards, sexual contact between SDS officers [#spycops] in their undercover identities and members of the public was not uncommon.”
David Barr: #spycop Richard Clark became a branch secretary at Troops Out Movement, having helped to set up the branch.
Clark then became London organiser, then its national organiser.
David Barr says that hearings for Tranche 2 of #SpyCopsInquiry will NOT be held next year, but will be delayed because of pandemic.
“The impact on our timetable is now more serious than we anticipated last November,” he says.
David Barr’s written opening statement clarifies that #spycop Richard Clark is now dead and had used the cover name “Rick Gibson” when targetting Troops Out Movement.
He had set up south-east London branch before ultimately becoming London organiser, then national organiser.
Friends of the Earth was among many target groups of #spycops, according to David Barr’s written opening statement.
Friends of the Earth swas infiltrated in around 1980 and 1981 because of its anti-nuclear campaigning.
This phase of #SpyCopsInquiry hearings covers 1973 (not 1972 as I said earlier) to 1982.
Met's lawyer says in opening statement that #spycops played an important role by feeding info to Security Service (MI5) to help in its counter-subversion work.
MI5 “was able to exert some influence over the placement of undercover officers,” Met's barrister, Peter Skelton tells #SpyCopsInquiry.
So MI5 helped Met decide which groups the #spycops should infiltrate.
Peter Skelton says that #spycop Michael Scott was one of several people convicted in 1972 of “obstruction of the highway and obstructing police”.
Sir John Mitting says that he will consider, following this phase of hearings, whether a miscarriage of justice arose in this case.
A #spycop attended the funeral of Blair Peach, Peter Skelton confirms to #SpyCopsInquiry .
The inquiry has obtained evidence from this #spycop, he adds.
Blair Peach died after a police officer struck him on the head during an anti-Nazi demonstration in Southall in 1979.
Oliver Sanders, lawyer for 116 #spycops, complains about summaries that are due to be read out in hearings of his clients' statements.
The #spycops have not checked these summaries, have not agreed them and do not accept them.
Inquiry is excluding key material re #spycops, says Oliver Sanders.
“Information about MI5 interest in or coverage of particular groups and individuals (by human and technical sources) has been withheld... creating a misleading impression of what the state as a whole was doing.”
“Witness Z”, MI5's anonymous witness, in statement to #SpyCopsInquiry: Security Service “stopped investigating subversion in 1996.”
But MI5 “started investigating right-wing, left-wing, anarchist, and single-issue extremism in 2020," Witness Z adds.
“Witness Z”: MI5 told Met Special Branch in 1972 that it needed “long-term agent penetration of subversive groups active in the unions."
But, says Witness Z, Met's then commissioner, Sir Robert Mark, limited Special Branch's role to likely trouble with law and order.
“Witness Z” to #SpyCopsInquiry: “The Security Service did not consider [in 1972] that subversive organisations posed a particularly high-priority threat.“
“The pressure to investigate these organisations often came from the prime minister and Whitehall.”
MI5 and Met Special Branch had a “close working relationship” for many years, “Witness Z” tells #SpyCopsInquiry in written statement.
But MI5 had a “closer relationship“ with provincial Special Branches “in general", he says. They “managed their agents in conjunction with“ MI5.
Senior Special Branch officer told MI5 in 1975 that #spycops unit SDS was “one of the [Met Special Branch’s] most closely protected secrets“, says “Witness Z” to #SpyCopsInquiry.
So, what might be its other most closely protected secrets?
“Witness Z”: “Security Service’s interest in London universities and polytechnics [as of 1968] was confined to left-wing radical and active student unions, some of which had members who were Trotskyist agitators.”
(For some reason, there is no inquiry into MI5’s activities.)
“Witness Z” to #SpyCopsInquiry: “The Security Service did provide [#spycops unit] with occasional and limited assistance with the development of... cover identities.”
“Assistance was occasional, intermittent and depended on the nature of the assistance sought.”
Round-up of today at #SpyCopsInquiry: Sex between officers from secret squad and members of the public “not uncommon“.
One #spycop recalls that #spycops unit SDS received messages from 10 Downing Street “with respect to the success of the SDS in combatting public disorder,“ according to gist of his statement prepared by #SpyCopsInquiry lawyers.
MI5 note on MI5-Met meeting in 1972 disclosed to #SpyCopsInquiry: “We were under increasing pressure from Whitehall... for more and more detailed information about subversive activities in industrial disputes and the degree of subversive influence in trades unions...“
“We needed to increase our agent coverage of industrial affairs, particularly in the Metropolitan area,“ continues MI5 officer's memo, disclosed to #SpyCopsInquiry.
He was writing a file note on his meeting with senior Met officers to seek more help from Special Branch in 1972.
MI5 officer continued in file note: “What we needed was long-term agent penetration of subversive groups active in the unions rather than casual informant sources.
“We had some success with provincial forces in this field.“
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Day 12 of #SpyCopsInquiry – fireworks expected: Dave Smith, of Blacklist Support Group, due to give his belated opening statement on what was due to be a non-sitting day.
Then lawyers for non-core participants to make an application on the scope of questioning for witnesses.
Dave Smith tells #SpyCopsInquiry that Blacklist Support Group represents union members who were blacklisted by construction companies. “When we first spoke about being blacklisted for our union activities we were ignored by the authorities and ridiculed as conspiracy theorists.”
Dave Smith in opening statement to #SpyCopsInquiry: “But blacklisting is not a conspiracy theory. It is a real life conspiracy: secretly organised by multinational construction firms with the collusion of the police and the security services.”
Day 11 of #SpyCopsInquiry: two #spycops who operated in 1969-72 due to be called – “Dick Epps” and “Alan Nixon”/”Alan Bailey”.
Summary of evidence from third #spycop in 1968-69, whose cover name (as well as real name) is being kept secret, due to be read out by inquiry lawyer.
“Dick Epps” in his statement to #SpyCopsInquiry on Conrad Dixon, who set up and headed Met’s SDS, its initial #spycop unit. “Conrad was a clever man, but also an ambitious and devious man. He saw an opportunity for himself as well as an opportunity to create something useful.”
As a Special Branch officer but before becoming a #spycop, “Dick Epps” was deployed to US embassy at time of the anti-Vietnam war demonstrations.
He says in statement: “The Americans had set up a machine gun inside the lobby of the building, ready to defend it if necessary.”
Day 10 of #spycops inquiry: two #spycops due to be called, first from management/back office, second used cover name, “Douglas Edwards”.
Summaries of evidence from three further #spycops – including “Don De Freitas” and “William Paul Lewis” – to be read out by inquiry lawyer.
Summary of statement by #spycop “Don De Freitas” read to inquiry: he was in SDS during 1968. He worked elsewhere in Special Branch before + after his brief time in SDS.
He targeted Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, and posed as boyfriend of “Margaret White”:
Summary of statement by #spycop “William/Bill Paul Lewis” read to inquiry: he was in SDS 1968-9; says that any #spycop arrested while undercover would have the issue resolved later.
Summary of statement by a third #spycop, cypher “HN322”, says that he did not use a cover name.
Day 9 of #spycops inquiry: three #spycops who infiltrated campaign against Vietnam war – “John Graham”, “Barry Morris” and “Margaret White”.
Plus statement to be read from Ernest Tate, of Vietnam Solidarity Campaign and an organiser of Vietnam war protest in London in 1968.
First up today, “HN329”, a #spycop in the Met Special Branch’s “Special Demonstration Squad” from 1968.
He used the cover name “John Graham”.
In his written statement, “John Graham” says that before he joined Met’s SDS he was in “C Squad” where he was “carrying out Communism related enquiries” and “engaging in covert work”.
Today, finally, #spycops inquiry is due to start hearing evidence, but it is not being live streamed to public.
We have been hearing core participants’ opening statements since last week. There may still be one or two more of those today before evidence begins.
Despite suggestion by Sir John Mitting yesterday that we would hear one or two further opening statements this am (we still have not heard from Dave Smith, a blacklisted construction worker, and Helen Steel, one of the McLibel 2), #spycops inquiry is going straight into evidence.
Sir John Mitting, chairman of #spycops inquiry, clarifies that Dave Smith cannot give his opening statement because he has contracted coronavirus.
Helen Steel cannot give hers because of unspecified different reasons. They may give their statements at some later point.
We start by hearing a broadside delivered at both #spycops inquiry and the Met delivered by Baroness Lawrence via her barrister, Imran Khan.
Baroness Lawrence, mother, of course, of Stephen Lawrence, “is losing confidence, if she has not already lost it, in the inquiry’s ability to get to the truth,” says Imran Khan to #spycops inquiry.