From the talk I gave at the ASCE Earth & Space conference today. When you land on the Moon, your rocket exhaust is faster than lunar escape velocity and there is no atmosphere to slow down the dust you blow. We need to worry about damaging things in orbit.

Short thread... /1
We've done a lot of experimental work to understand how much lunar soil will blow because of the rocket exhaust during a landing. The work included reduced gravity flights measuring soil erosion in lunar gravity. /2
As you would expect, erosion rate is faster when gravity is lower. That part of the physics is easily understood, at least. Erosion of soil on another planet scales as 1-over-gravity. /3
The equation shows that erosion is proportional to the shear stress that the rocket exhaust causes upon the lunar surface, and inversely proportional to the energy that it takes to lift a lunar sand grain. Seems pretty obvious, now, but it took years of work to prove this. /4
However, there are huge uncertainties, like what happens when the gas expands into vacuum so the viscosity breaks down and it stops acting like a normal gas? What happens to turbulence (which is crucial to soil erosion)? Etc. Lots of unsolved physics, here! /5
But doing the best we can, this shows how much soil will blow as a function of the mass of the lunar lander. The Apollo LM was 5-7 tons. Future landers will blow a LOT more soil. (This graph assumes the engines UNDER the vehicle. I know...not all landers are like that👍🙂) /6
Here is what happens after the soil is blown off the Moon. The smallest dust goes 5X the speed of a bullet, so it looks like a straight line over this distance. An orbiting spacecraft might fly through this ejecta as it is blown off the Moon. /7
The number of dust particles that hit the spacecraft is 256 million per square meter. It is so many because they are so small. Most of them are smaller than a micron. But it adds up to a LOT of damage. One exposure could chip of 4% of a piece of glass, like a camera lens. /8
As a result, we need to do collision avoidance -- timing the lunar landings so that no spacecraft will happen to fly through their ejecta sheet. We will need landing pads when lunar traffic becomes very high. We need international agreements to manage these effects. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Phil Metzger

Dr. Phil Metzger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrPhiltill

10 Apr
Since this Guardian writer has recycled the super-uninformed claim "we ought to be spending the money on Earth instead," it is now time to recycle the informed responses. (1) Hardly *any* money is spent on space. E.g., the US spends 4X as much on tobacco as on space. 1/n
2/n US consumers spend 5X more on credit card interest and fees as we spend on NASA. Every year the US spends $1.77 Trillion on retail food, and about 30-40% is thrown away, which is equal to 31X the amount we spend on NASA.
3/n Every year the US spends 12.5X as much on alcoholic drinks as we do on NASA, and 77% of that is for binge drinking. In other words, the US spends 10X as much on binge drinking as we do on NASA. (NASA makes you feel better in the morning, by the way.) cdc.gov/alcohol/featur…
Read 22 tweets
3 Feb
😟😟😟 This chart is SO untrue, though, as the published records show. Asteroids were NOT removed by scientists from being planets until the 1950s. Moons were classified by astronomers as planets until the 1920s. I’m so sad this nonsense chart is being published because... 1/
2/...it is going to amplify the presentism fallacy that has plagued astronomers over the past few decades. Presentism is when you take a view that developed in recent times and use it to interpret past events as if that view had existed back then. voicesandimages.com/presentism-don…
3/ The idea that planets only include the primaries (no moons) and doesn’t include minor planets (no asteroids) is a relatively recent view among astronomers. But the public has held that view since the mid-1800s because it came from 1800s astrology, not from scientists.
Read 11 tweets
30 Jan
I have worked with lunar samples but I don’t remember smelling anything. The astronauts who were there reported that it smelled like gunpowder. Our belief is that on the Moon the minerals have broken chemical bonds on their surfaces that activate our smell sensation, BUT... 1/2
2/ ...when lunar samples are exposed to air, the molecules bond with those locations on the minerals, passivating their surfaces, so they lose the gunpowder smell. In Houston the samples are stored in dry nitrogen but no gas is perfectly pure so passivation is inevitable I guess.
3/ This is the story we tell, but I’m not totally sure about the details. It raises the question how did the dust retain its smell as the Lunar Module was re-pressurized and the crew removed their helmets to smell it? Was the air still dry enough, even as sweat was evaporating?
Read 13 tweets
29 Jan
Great article explaining why there’s no reason to assume anything beyond natural process for ‘Oumuamua. The preprint (not paywalled) is here: arxiv.org/pdf/1907.01910…
Not an expert here, but I asked astronomers in our faculty group and they tell me that the extreme light curve might not be entirely due to ‘Oumuamua’s shape. For example, it could be a contact binary where one lobe is a brighter material than the other lobe. Compare Arrokoth:
3/ If different parts of the object have different albedos, then it might be less than 6-to-1 in elongation. So the light curve that suggests it has extreme elongation shouldn’t be considered so strange. But even if it does have > 6:1 elongation, even that is not so strange.
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
Here's a concept I developed at NASA 18 years ago:

"Multipole Radiation Shielding."

Our director called it the First Generation Star Trek Shield. My lab lead had the idea to use electrostatics to protect spacecraft from cosmic radiation and he asked me to lead the effort. 1/n
2/ The problem with using electrostatics to shield a spacecraft is that space is filled with both positive and negative charged particles, so if you use a positive field you attract the negative particles, and vice versa. Then,...
3/...your "shield" actually speeds up those particles so they hit you faster and cause MORE problems.

For example, galactic cosmic radiation is positive nuclei. They were accelerated in the shockwaves of supernovae throughout the galaxy and they randomly enter our solar system.
Read 29 tweets
13 Jan
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about measures of complexity. Look at the complex structures in a star. Amazing! It is mind-blowing that such complexity naturally arises in the cosmos simply because a bunch of mass gravitated together and started fusion 🤯

And... (thread) /1
2/ that’s not all. The Sun has these self-organizing Bénard cells all over its surface. These are convection cells where the plasma is hotter and rising, surrounded by borders where it is colder and falling. Amazing! Put enough mass together, you get this🤯 (Source: NSO/AURA/NSF)
3/ Here’s a gif showing the convection that self-organizes into similar Bénard cells. This process just happens naturally in many situations in nature, including in stars 🤯 (Image credit: G. Kelemen, fyfluiddynamics.com/2017/10/lookin…)
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!