It's official: Biden will commit to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions 50-52% below 2005 levels by the end of the decade. He'll make the commitment at 8am EST today as the virtual climate summit with world leaders kicks off.
nytimes.com/live/2021/04/2…

#ClimateAction #EarthDay2021
This goal is almost double the commitment the Obama Admin set for 2025 (25-28% below 2005) and requires accelerating the pace of emissions declined observed over the last decade. See below for progress to date (via @rhodium_group). 2030 goal requires ~3,200 MMT CO2 equivalent.
Making this goal a reality will require steep reductions in fossil fuel use across all sectors.

We'd have to virtually eliminate coal from power generation by 2030, ramp up clean sources (to more than double today's share), and cut electricity emissions to 75-80% below 2005.
EV sales & internal combustion vehicles efficiency need to soar. UMD estimated we'd need EV sales to reach 40% of light duty and 15% of medium and heavy by 2030 while the efficiency of gasoline cars and trucks keeps rising.

More would be needed in industry, buildings, land use.
The Biden goal is more ambitious than trajectory in @Princeton Net-Zero America study, which applied straight-line emissions constraint reaching 0 by 2050. That permitted 57% of 2005 in 2030 and 44% of 2005 in 2035, so crossing the 50% mark circa 2032/33.
This is a couple years faster than the Net-Zero America study trajectory. We did not optimize our trajectory, just applied a straight line to 2050. So Biden's 2030 pledge is consistent with the path to net-zero emissions. For more on what that looks like: NetZeroAmerica.princeton.edu
It is important to note that while the changes required to get on path to net-zero are transformative, they are affordable and achievable, we found in the Net-Zero America study. The incremental cost through 2030 is modest (less than 3%) and balanced by health benefits.
Getting on the path to net-zero will mean mobilizing on the order of $2.5 trillion in additional capital investment in clean energy and climate solutions this decade. That's not a cost, it's an investment, paid back over time. Incremental expenditures on energy are <$300b we est.
Finally, for more on the kinds of policies that could mobilize that capital, ensure a just transition and put us on path to net-zero, see @theNASEM report, Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S Energy System that I was part of: nap.edu/resource/25932…

/End.
PS links to the resources referenced in this thread:

UMD GCAM group on 51% by 2030 NDC cgs.umd.edu/research-impac…

@rhodium_group 2020 GHGs rhg.com/research/preli….

@Princeton Net-Zero America netzeroamerica.princeton.edu

@theNASEM Accelerating Decarbonization nap.edu/resource/25932…
Oh, and p.p.s., here is the White House fact sheet on the 2030 emissions goals whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JesseJenkins

JesseJenkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JesseJenkins

20 Apr
Uniper is planning a 'hydrogen hub' in Wilhelmshaven, Germany, w/ammonia import terminal, 410 MW electrolyser, and regional H2 transport network: gulfenergyinfo.com/h2tech/news/20…

The America Jobs Plan calls for 15 clean H2 demonstrations that could seed similar hubs in the US by the way.
Note that aammonia, or NH3, is a potential long-distance carrier of H2. Hence the import terminal and proposed 'ammonia cracker' in the Uniper hub plans.
Notable too: "In addition, Uniper is working ... to ascertain whether it would be feasible to build a direct reduction plant w/upstream H2 electrolysis on the site of the existing power plant in Wilhelmshaven, as well as the required infrastructure for supplying raw materials."
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
The more I sit with the 25-page overview of the Biden #Infrastructure & #JobsPlan, the more it's clear: the measure of a plan is not the total $ it spends but its impact. There is a lot in this plan that isn't clearly scored w/$ figure. But the total impact looks transformative.
This #JobsPlan presents a vision for how to rebuild the U.S. economy. That vision clearly places at its center a set of investments to build a clean energy economy, enhance resilience to climate change & extreme weather, and address persistent environmental injustices.
Why do I say the #JobsPlan's clean energy investments look transformative?

My group at Princeton will be taking a close look at the plan & modeling its impact in coming weeks (as details become clearer), but let's take a first look at this thing together whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Read 20 tweets
31 Mar
*Very Biden voice* Folks, here's the deal:

At ~$1 TRILLION in total clean investment, what Biden is proposing in #JobsAct is not just bigger than clean investment in the Recovery Act of 2009 (~$90b), it's bigger than the ENTIRE Recovery Act (~$831b)!

Details #EnergyTwitter ⤵️
The White House Fact Sheet here details more than $550 billion in what we can classify generally as clean investment, incl:

$174b for EVs
$165b for public transit & rail
$100b for grid
$46b for clean energy manufacturing
$35b clean energy RD&D
& more: whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
IN ADDITION, @washingtonpost reports "The plan will also include approximately $400 billion in clean-energy credits on top of the $2.25 trillion in new spending."

That takes the total clean investment in the American Jobs Act to >$950 billion.

washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021…
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
*Very Biden voice* Folks, here's the deal:

At ~$1 TRILLION in total clean investment, what Biden is proposing in American Jobs Act is not just bigger than the clean investment in the Recovery Act of 2009 (~$90b), it's bigger than the ENTIRE Recovery Act (~$831b)!

Details ⤵️
The White House Fact Sheet here details more than $550 billion in what we can classify generally as clean investment, incl:

$174b for EVs
$165b for public transit & rail
$100b for grid
$46b for clean energy manufacturing
$35b clean energy RD&D
& more:

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
IN ADDITION, @washingtonpost reports "The plan will also include approximately $400 billion in clean-energy credits on top of the $2.25 trillion in new spending."

That takes the total clean investment in the American Jobs Act to >$950 billion.

washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021…
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
#ClimateAction is embedded throughout the 'American Jobs Plan,' including over $500b in what could be described as 'clean investment.' That's more than 5-times larger that the 2009 Recovery Act's spending on similar areas for context. An overview: nytimes.com/interactive/20…
The plan would invest:

$174 billion in incentivizing electric vehicle manufacture and purchase, building half a million charger stations

$85b for public transit investments

$80b for modernizing Amtrak and freight railways
$100b to build a more reslient electric grid & expand transmission to harness renewable energy

$46b for clean energy manufacturing

$46b for fed govt to procure fleets of EVs

$35b for 'climate technology' R&D

$16b for fossil workers transition

$10b for Civilian Climate Corps
Read 7 tweets
29 Mar
🧵New paper in @NatureEnergyJnl evaluating long-duration energy storage technologies.

Innovative, low-cost storage could make a decarbonized electricity system more affordable and reliable, and partially substitute for clean firm generation.

Summary: bit.ly/LDES_summary
The full paper, led by @nsepulvedam with myself, @dhariksm, Aurora Edington and Richard Lester (old @mitenergy friends!) is at @NatureEnergyJnl here: doi.org/10.1038/s41560…

You can read a copy for a limited time at rdcu.be/chG2k
@MITNews summarizes the new study here: energy.mit.edu/news/powering-…

And I'll do the same with the rest of this thread...
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!