I keep using game theory and quantitative finance terms to describe why #bitcoin is a terrible investment. But let me try a different metaphor that might be more relatable. 🧡

Poker. πŸƒ

(1/)
In a poker game people show up with cash, a buy-in. They convert this money with the house to get tokens which they then use to play. (2/)
If you sum over all players buy-in you get the total possible winnings any one player could possibly win. This is a fixed value that can't increase unless more players are added. (3/)
After a few hands and bets everyone's holdings are now different. You won a few hands and lost a few hands, but the amount of money in the game has not changed. It's simply changes hands. (4/)
A game like this is called zero-sum, every one person's winning is necessarily another person's losses. It's simply shifting money around.

Now what happens to the total if the house takes a cut on all this action? (5/)
Say the house charges 5% to cash-in, 10% when you cash out tokens at the end of the night and for every hand the house takes a fixed $5 from the pool.

What happens to the total possible winnings? (6/)
The pool of money must decreases on every hand. So the amount that any one player can possibly win keeps going down and down the longer you play. (7/)
You may get lucky on a few hands, but if you are the average player your odds of winning are no different than any other player. Which means as you keep playing your winnings will tend to mean-revert back to the initial money you started with minus the rake the house takes. (8/)
So on average if you play this game on long periods of time with a fixed player pool, your expected returns are negative. Not surprisingly, because this is gambling. (9/)
Investing in crypto coins has exactly the same structure as this game. When you invest in an asset with no cashflows and high market fees and transaction costs you're playing a rigged game. You might get lucky a few times, but most people statistically won't. (10/)
When an investment doesn't involve any productive economic activity it's simply a game of shuffling money around in a rigged game. Mostly to the house.

Crypto coins are gambling not investing. And the optimal solution to this game is not to play. (11/)
Every cognitive fallacy that applies to casino games of chance also applies to putting money into negative-sum investment schemes like Ponzis.

The reason people get addicted to these games is they over estimate their wins and ignore their losses. (12/)
Always analyze investment opportunites from a purely unemotional and statistical perspective. And the expected returns from crypto gambling are terrible.

Every millionaire you hear about is paid out by thousands of suckers getting taken on a FOMO ride. Don't let it be you.

/fin

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Stephen Diehl

Stephen Diehl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @smdiehl

20 Apr
Let's talk about why the #bitcoin narrative is intellectually incoherent and why the emperor has no clothes. 🧡 (1/)
Bitcoiners are deeply confused people. In particular they are duplicitous (or genuinely confused) about the purpose of their allegedly paradigm-shifting technology and whether it is:

A) An Investment
B) A Currency

(2/)
These two classes of financial instruments are complete opposites. The better something is as a speculative investment, the worse it is as an actual currency.

However crypto advocates want to use and refer to the properties of both simultaneously without justifying either.

(3/)
Read 19 tweets
19 Apr
When economists describe crypto assets like bitcoin as a "greater fool" investment what do they mean? 🧡 (1/)
It's important to note the actual buying behaviour people have with crypto assets.

People buy them from a service like Robinhood or Coinbase and hold their tokens in hopes that "number go up" so it can be redeemed for dollars. This is effectively 99% of consumer behavior. (2/)
Because there's no utility or cashflow from a bitcoin, they only way one can possibly make money from this scheme is for the exchange who holds your tokens to find someone who will buy your tokens from you for more than you paid. (3/)
Read 15 tweets
26 Mar
Let's discuss the nature of 'control fraud' in the corporate world, and how businesses which are legitimate in their individual components can be fraudulent in their overarching structure. 🧡
So say you're an executive at a company (maybe like a bank or a crypto company), and you want to commit some activity that is legally prohibited and/or fraudulent. But you also want to protect yourself against liability from that action.
The absolute best way to do this is not to create a line of business for the fraud, personally profit, and then cover it up; but instead create a sufficiently criminogenic corporate environment in which others do the fraud for you "without" your knowledge while you profit.
Read 18 tweets
25 Mar
With Gamestop and Robinhood recently in the news I've seen quite a few developers making some very silly and needlessly risky financial decisions. Let's talk about investing a bit. 🧡(1/)
First a BIG disclaimer. Giving financial advice outside of an advisory relationship is illegal. This is not investment advice, just my personal opinions.

However it is common knowledge there are well-known ways to needlessly light money on fire. Let's talk about those. (2/)
The first is day trading. Day trading is a ridiculously stupid activity, and not all that different from gambling or other risk-seeking addictive behaviour that hacks your brain's dopamine-cycle. Not even once. (3/)
Read 19 tweets
24 Mar
There's a strong argument that Proof of Stake token networks have a colonialist taint.

Negative-sum speculative assets based on no economic activity are a net wealth redistribution back to early stakeholders. Which are moneyed Westerners with capital and influence to buy early.
Every early investor that makes a return on the sale of negative-sum "investment" token is necessarily paid out by a pyramid of hundreds of small losers.

If these products are marketed in developing economies as "solutions" to the unbanked, that's very ethically problematic.
Primarily because the premise of these get-rich-quick investments is based on confusion and that's exploited in marketing.

They aren't stores of values, they aren't currencies, they're simply greater-fool gambling products.
Read 4 tweets
22 Mar
The question the ACM can't ask in this article is the obvious one. Ransomware wasn't a threat until bitcoin, when you create an anonymous network to transfer money to strangers sight unseen ... of course criminals will exploit that. That's it's purpose.

cacm.acm.org/news/251337-th…
If you go to a bank and try to wire ransom money to a hacker in Siberia, they won't let you. That's a feature. It's an unprofitable enterprise for the criminals and they then don't bother.

Making ransoms unpayable stymies crime.
Ransomware is going to be an absolute plague on Western economies for the next decade. Like the point where it starts effecting GDP.

Enterprise software is creaking around the corners and this is going to an *absurdly* profitable enterprise for hacking groups.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!