"Researchers with decades of post-infection experience need to be at the forefront of the Long COVID research agenda, or we risk delaying our understanding and treatment of this illness." 2/
"ME/CFS researchers have made substantial discoveries in the areas of metabolic profiling, neuroimmunology, metabolomics & proteomics, impaired endothelial function in POTS, mitochondrial fragmentation, antiviral & metabolic phenotypes, hypoperfusion & cerebral blood flow..." 3/
"...overlaps with connective tissue disorders, autoimmunity & autoantibodies, intracranial hypertension, neuroimaging & specialized imaging techniques for post-viral patients.
Researchers not in the post-infection space may have less awareness of these areas of research." 4/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a *wild* but must-read story: a professor of psychology tries to convince insurance companies that #LongCOVID is not real, but that it was made up by @GeorgeMonbiot who wrote a January 2021 column on it.
The catch: this psychologist has been doing this for every post-viral illness (like ME), because he has made a career off Cognitive Behavior Therapy as a "cure" - and continued to push it even after it was rated "low-very low" scientific quality. 2/
A entire special issue in the Journal of Health Psychology noted that this guy & his team showed a "consistent pattern of resistance", were "unwilling to enter into the spirit of scientific debate", & "acted with a sense of entitlement not to have to respond to criticism." 3/
New data from the Office of National Statistics in the UK, which has been doing some of the best #LongCOVID prevalence work.
The previous estimate of 10% still sick at 12 weeks is updated to 13.7%. Instead of 1 in 10, now 1 in 7.
This includes kids, so is higher in adults. 1/
For the first time, they've released age-based prevalence numbers for the % of people still sick at 12 weeks. People (with PCR+ tests) still sick with #LongCOVID at 12 weeks, by age:
Notably, like other longitudinal studies, there's only a small percentage point difference between men & women: of those who test positive, 12.7% of males, 14.7% of females will be sick with #LongCOVID at 12 weeks.
Of all the age groups, age 25-34 is most affected at 18.2%.
3/
I do think there is mounting evidence that people with #LongCOVID have disproportionately low antibody levels, and that might be key to understanding the illness. It's also a crucial reason why people without antibodies need to be included in #LongCOVID research. 2/
The big downside of this paper is they only asked about 9 symptoms, none of which were neurological (like sensorimotor issues, "brain fog") except headache. Of those 9, they found that diarrhea or loss of smell in the acute phase were predictive of #LongCOVID at 7 months. 3/
Because @itsbodypolitic is on Slack, it has the ability to have mini-support groups within the larger group. This is a reminder that it has specific (private) channels for #LongCOVID patients who are:
1. Medical professionals 2. BIPOC 3. LGBTQ+ 4. Men
There is also a new Japanese-language channel for Japanese-speaking #longhaulers! cc @ygjumi 2/
There are a total of 61 channels on many topics, including symptom-specific channels (neurological, endocrine, reproductive health, GI, circulatory), but also advocacy, financial concerns, parents/#LongCOVID children, vaccine responses, & many more. If you are suffering, join! 3/
This is a big deal: adequate rest in the early weeks was protective against a more severe #LongCOVID category (measured by fatigue, ability to work, care for self, etc).
Also! Higher income was protective against ending up in this category as well. 2/
Those are two factors that are crucial to talking about #LongCOVID recovery: people need adequate time to rest, and there are huge inequalities in who is able to and can afford to do that! 3/