I love this beautiful planet & I want it, & those who inhabit it, to flourish.
So today, on #earthday, it’s an ideal time to expose the ill-considered arguments that undermine environmental progress by claiming ‘#bitcoin is bad for the environment’. (‘How dare you!’)
Thread👇
What do people mean when they say ‘bad for the environment’? If the concern is merely to avoid disrupting the natural harmony of the earth ex-humans, then nearly all human action is ‘bad’ for it.
However, if we take a human-centered perspective (what else?), our primary concern should be to judge the benefits of our actions, against the costs incurred in taking them.
Now, if we had the benefit of a true free-market, we would be receiving far more accurate signals to more precisely quantify and react to these costs, but that argument is for another time.
The point is that we should not be attempting to have ‘no impact’ on the earth, but rather trying to make sure that the impact we do have is maximally worthwhile.
‘Worthwhile’ meaning that the action contributes to the ability to perpetuate human flourishing, more than it impedes it.
Seen in this way, the question becomes, does an activity lead to the production and proliferation of life-enhancing resources in greater amounts than it consumes them?
If the answer is ‘yes’, then such an activity would reasonably be called ‘good’ for *our* (not ‘the’) environment.
So, considering this, how then should we assess the cost/benefit analysis of bitcoin? The potential ‘benefit’ of a thing can be considered as the utility, multiplied by its useful life (utility x useful life = benefit).
If bitcoin truly does become the dominant global money, then it will, by definition, become the most useful thing in the world (money being the ‘most saleable good’, used for coordinating all other market activity).
Furthermore, given bitcoin’s distributed, digital nature, it does not degrade whatsoever, and can therefore be infinitely ‘recycled’ (maintain or increase its utility), at least as long as bitcoin remains the monetary standard.
Put simply, there is literally nothing more beneficial than something that serves the highest possible use in society (money), which suffers no degradation of utility.
The benefit of this would be the continuous coordination of an unprecedented and inexhaustible wellspring of human flourishing, including the requisite innovation and market-led coordination to solve whatever ‘environmental problems’ emerge.
Said another way, bitcoin appears to have the highest ‘human flourishing-to-resource consumption ratio’ (lowest cost/benefit ratio) of anything, ever.
This means that, regardless of how it is produced, bitcoin may not only be erroneously labeled ‘bad for our environment’, but may instead be literally the best possible thing for it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
‘The answer to the problems of humanity is the integrity of the individual.’ - @jordanbpeterson
1/6 As a result, the fidelity with which that integrity is communicated is of paramount importance.
2/6 Money is the signal through which we communicate our values & principles to the market (other people). Distortion of the money leads to distortion of the ‘data’ it’s meant to carry (what we’re ‘communicating’ and consequently ‘who we are’).
3/6 Incorruptible money permits unadulterated communication, via the propagation of pristine price signals.
It’s an important occasion, marking the next step in bitcoin’s inevitable march to becoming not only the hardest money ever, but the first instantiation of objectively verifiable absolute scarcity that humanity has ever engaged with.
2/ As such, each step in this process, and in particular the early ones, are a big deal.
If demand remains constant, and supply is cut, there should be upwards pressure on price. Happy days!
1/4 Bitcoin represents a paradigm shift on so many levels. Its ‘unconfiscatability’ is one of them. Prior to it, power could always be used to take wealth, and as a result, power was required to protect wealth and create order (manifesting many societal institutions, such as law)
2/4 Such a dynamic makes abuses and conflict inevitable (power corrupts)—and true freedom impossible. What is the ‘ordering principle’ in a bitcoin paradigm, where power cannot be used to steal wealth?
3/4 Harmony, via aligned incentives, inspired by the knowledge that *now* cooperation, not power, is the most efficient means of obtaining wealth. During the transition, as the old system fails, wealth will flow from assets in the old paradigm (confiscatable)..