‘80% of Labour's vote now comes from Remain supporters, the only realistic choice open to the party is to craft an appeal that will maintain & enhance its support among Remain voters, be they working class or not.’

- Curtice - Wiley Online Library onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/ I have found this a real dilemma. I have supported @Keir_Starmer in his attempt to win back Brexit red wall voters but many, working class or not, seem to have values more in common with right wing Tories so as Curtice implies they may not return to @UKLabour as hoped. -
3/ So is @UKLabour & @Keir_Starmer chasing a ‘will o’ the wisp’ if hoping to build a recovery upon Red wall voters. If they cannot by now have seen the harm Brexit has done to the U.K. will they ever do so? Some may but probably many will not & meanwhile remainers alienated?
4/ @Keir_Starmer & @UKLabour are a far more attractive option than the Brexit supporting & equivocating Corbyn & his Brexit appeasing wing. But if these elections are poor for Labour perhaps Red wall Brexit appeasement by Labour should stop in favour of a more robust attack on it
5/ I still believe @Keir_Starmer & @UKLabour are the best vehicle for dislodging corrupt Tories but they should perhaps stop dancing around Brexit which is hurting the U.K for fear of red wall reaction. Worry about majority of left of centre supporters who still loath Brexit?
6/ Yes - the crooked Tories will utilise the ‘well you voted for Brexit’ argument against Labour but as was made clear this was a vote against ‘no deal’. @UKLabour needs to step up attack upon Tory mishandling of Brexit implementation which was not what Labour votes for.
7/ Curtice got it right in his piece. The old class based politics has been replaced by the politics of cultural values. I do not support Labour pandering to the values of the Red Wall. If they are comfortable voting Tory they do not share my values at all. Re-calibration needed
8/ So as Curtice implies as picked up by @pollytoynbee perhaps we do need to readjust the target voter for @UKLabour to secure. Those who support rejoining EU, tactical voters from @LibDems & Greens & even rejoin former Tories with integrity horrified by corrupt Johnson cabal.
9/ The red wall ex Labour voters have had their chance. Despite U.K. being hurt by Brexit & Tory corruption they still seem to want to vote for the Buffoon & his incompetent government. I think we should stop pandering to them and say you & Tories deserve each other. We don’t -
10/ lastly, with apologies for this lengthy thread, I have tried to support the @Keir_Starmer view that Brexit is dead as an issue but it’s not. We need to reunite the progressive tribes in an electoral pact to deliver PR. May lead to rejoin but also a win for progressive values
@threadreaderapp please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robin Murray

Robin Murray Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robinthemint

25 Oct 20
1.Tory MPs threats to shops feeding children & saying food vouchers are used by poor for brothels & crack dens - claim their EXACT word are ‘taken out of context’. When did ‘context’ become an Orwellian concept of ‘double think’ where we are to pretend opposite of what’s said?
2. There is no other “context“ or surrounding framework set out in the original tweets by Tory MPs. threatening shops providing food for children for free, with hostile treatment from HMG. Nor for the quite dreadful slur on poor that they use food vouchers for brothels or Crack.
3. For the record in my work as a criminal lawyer I have never known food vouchers exchanges for Brothels or crack.
The real context is that this generation of Conservatives, with a few exceptions are far nastier than those once complained of by Mrs May as the ‘nasty party’.
Read 6 tweets
9 Oct 20
Great letter in the Guardian from His honour Michael Heath.
Lawyers are “made of stern stuff. Unlike politicians they do not crave popularity. Johnson will take them on at his peril. That he appears to contemplate doing so shows his lack of judgement.”
We need to make him pay.
I wonder whether the next Tory MP charged with an offence will enjoy the thought that a jury may regard his or her defence lawyer as a “do gooding lefty lawyer”whose advocacy they should dismiss because of the lack of credibility after attacks from the PM and Home Secretary?
If the rumours are true and I will not say any more about it here we may find out soon enough if the damage done by the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary has in fact hamstrung the criminal justice system. It is this government which is a threat to justice not lawyers.
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct 20
I think we should withdraw all professional cooperation with the government at every level until we receive a public apology. I think @TheLawSociety @thebarcouncil @TheCriminalBar @CrimeSolicitors @lccsa etc should demand an immediate clarification of PM’s & Home secs comment
2/ Apart from anything else withdrawal of cooperation and further action will focus public attention on the lies being told by the government about lawyers. We need to fight back and make them sorry they came to this fight. I’ve had enough of them. They underpay us & insult us
3/ I know we’re going to hear now from the “what’s the point of the public don’t care brigade” but we are advocates and well-connected and we can make the government pay in adverse publicity at least for their disgusting & dishonest utterances about lawyers. We have to fight NOW
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct 20
1/ Mr Johnson has launched another attack. This time on criminal Lawyers. lawgazette.co.uk/news/johnson-o…. He said he wanted to stop ‘ the whole CJS from being hamstrung by what the home secretary would doubtless and rightly call the lefty human rights lawyers and other do-gooders.’
2/ My whole career, along with many other dedicated lawyers has been dedicated to ensuring that people are properly represented and to ensuring only the guilty are convicted whilst the innocent go free. We have done this whilst being grossly under funded. I say that Johnson’s
3/ his remarks are even more unfair and discreditable than those of his strange Home Secretary. I have at times been placed at personal risk in doing my duty. See this previous article on the dangers of public denigration of criminal Lawyers. mintedlaw.wordpress.com/2019/01/29/vio….
Read 5 tweets
18 Sep 20
How disgusting it is that Tory MP,s are cutting & pasting an utterly false equation of Parliamentary sovereignty in the Miller Supreme Court case with UK’s obligation to obey the law especially as many disagreed with the SC at the time. Here @thatginamiller puts them straight.👇
2/ Which is exactly what I have been hammering on about for days now. The @neill_bob backstop amendment has nothing to do with parliamentary sovereignty - it is all to do with providing political cover for existing illegality. It is too late by then because if the IMB is passed-
3/ by that time the IMB is already existing evidence itself of the UK’s illegal behaviour because it breaches a negotiated treaty obligations recognised in international law under articles 4:2 & 5. The Rubicon to illegality will have already been crossed by our pound shop Caesar.
Read 11 tweets
16 Sep 20
Article 4. 2 of WA
‘The UK shall ensure compliance including as regards the required powers of its judicial &administrative authorities to disapply inconsistent or incompatible domestic provisions, through domestic primary legislation.’ How does parliamentary lock deal with it?🤷‍♂️
2-Article 5 WA Good Faith’:
‘They shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising from this Agreement & shall refrain from any measures which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of this Agreement.
3- With all respect to those Tory MPs who seem to think that a Parliamentary vote (lock) on the bill solves the problem just reading the WA articles 4.2 & 5 reveals the Bill with or without a lock contravenes the WA. This seems indisputable to me and hardly good faith.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!