COPS Profile picture
23 Apr, 28 tweets, 6 min read
Next at the #SpyCopsInquiry, we hear from Rajiv Menon QC, representing Piers Corbyn
From the start of the #SpyCopsInquiry, the spied on have been concerned about the state's prioritisation of secrecy, the lack of redress on these matters, & the late disclosure of evidence by the Inquiry
We note the police lawyers are having a judicial review of an Inquiry decision, but we're not being told what it's about. So much of this 'public' inquiry excludes victims & the wider public. Without full inclusion of those spied on, the Inquiry is not worth having
Piers Corbyn is now 74 but has not given up his lifelong activism. He was one of the 1st people to apply to be a Core Participant in the Inquiry, 5 years ago.
The evidence we've been supplied with has issues. The pasges scream out the fact that the SDS was never about protecting parliamentary democracy or maintaining public order. It was to spy on people & orgs because of their ideas & politics.
Limited public disorder involving spycops was largely minor, & doesn't justify the huge spycops operations. There's a 21 page report on an IMG conference in 1972, & 55 pages on 1976 one. These detail currents in IMG & summarise debates, as well as details of attendees
There is nothing about protecting parlaimentary democracy nor preventing public disorder. It was weird Orwellian-Monty Python spying on the left, despite the far right violence on thee streets at the time. This partisanship is not opinion, it is plain fact.
Spycops admit gathering as much info as possible, however personal or trivial, for others to discern.
MI5's 'Witness Z' confirms the SDS has always been subordinate to MI5.
Witness Z is not being called to give evidence, we cannot understand why this is. Their statement provided shows they have so much vital knowledge about #SpyCops.
The secret state itself undermines our democratic institutions.
The Inquiry is only calling 8 of the officers from the era begin examines 1973-82 are being called. 10 others are not coming for various reasons.The Inquiry should be hearing from as many spycops as possible.
We saw in the last hearings that witnesses remember detail under questioning that they did not when writing statements.
We are also dismayed that fully anonymous SDS officers' evidence is redacted to an 8 page group gist. We cannot say which officer did what. We need to know what they did individually if their info is any use to anyone at all.
Most vintage reports made spycops by aren't in the documents we've been given. We though it was due to others being destroyed, but police lawyers say the Inquiry has many more but is choosing not to release them
We're told lots of the files we've seen that many docs are MI5 copies. This suggests Special Branch has been destroying files, which is worrying. Notable MI5 isn't handing over its own relevant docs, just copies of police ones
The Inquiry is redacting names of groups spied on. None of this is justifiable. We're looking at 35-50 years ago, what's the problem? What are they hiding? [here's the most complete list @UndercoverNet was able to compile theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-int… ]
Reports 1969-84 have 130 group names redacted. Why must these remain secret forever, at the insistence of those who did the spying. It's a betrayal of the purpose of the #SpyCopsInquiry. We call for all these names to be unredacted.
We're not being given enough time to read & digest material by the Inquiry. We were meant to get docs in mid march, but another 2000+ pages have been added in April. Nobody can go through all that in a matter of a couple of weeks.
Piers Corbyn had no idea of the extent of the spying on him. Having been a Core Participant for over 5 years, he knew little until recently. He has always been open about his politics & has nothing to hide, in contrast with the anonymous spycops who spied on him.
Why was Piers Corbyn of interest? His file was opened in 1969, & he still can't see it. He was President of ther Imperial College Union. He joined the International Marxist Group. He supported Irish rights, anti racism, & trade union rights.
He was very active in London squatting in the 1970s. In1982 he joined the Labour Party, & campaigned on the cost of public transport. He became a Labour councillor for 4 years. He is mentioned in passing in one spycops report that we've seen.
2 officer HN299 Dave Hughes & HN353 Gary Roberts mention him in their witness statements to the Inquiry but will not be giving evidence. The Inquiry has shown him pics of some spycops but not the ones who spied on him!
He was granted Core Participancy on the grounds of his 1970s squatting activism, but this apparently isn't the basis of the spying. What we want to see is his file, to see the full nature of what he was spied on for. Why won't they let him see it?
Why can't the Inquiry compel the police to do it? Is it because it's so tedious & unnecessary that it will embarrass them? Or something else? We'll never know. While secrecy trumps openness, the Inquiry will never achieve its purpose.
The police lawyers express concern about Tariq Ali's comments about the killing of Blair Peach & what Piers Corbyn said about the killing of Kevin Gately. But Peach was killed by a police officer. That is the truth. It is not inflammatory or contentious.
To ignore the fact that a police officer's blow killed Peach is to deny history. Ali was also hit over the head by police on at the demo at which Peach was killed
Kevin Gately died at a 1974 demo from a blunt hard object, while mounted officers while striking at heads in the crowd. Those are the facts. It's reasonable for people such as Piers Corbyn to believe the most likely explanation is that it was a police truncheon blow.
The victims of spycops are dismayed at the new delays to the Inquiry. This benefits those who want delay. More documents will be lost and destroyed, more witnesses will die. justice delayed is justice denied. campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/2021/04/20/new…
With that, Menon concludes. There will now be an hour's break for lunch, proceedings will resume at 2.15pm

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with COPS

COPS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @copscampaign

23 Apr
The #SpyCopsInquiry now hears its last opening statement of the day, from Dave Morris. Dave is a lifelong campaigner for environmental & social justice, peace & other issues of compassion. He is perhaps best known as one of the #McLibel 2.
Morris is responding to material he's recently seen about spying on him by spycop Graham Coates, which the Inquiry has known about for years but only just shared.
Morris reiterates Heaven's conclusion, & reaffirms his earlier statements to the Inquiry, including parts endorsed by 90 Core Particpants.
Read 32 tweets
23 Apr
The #SpyCopsInquiry resumes with Kirsten Heaven, representing 'Non-Police, Non-State Core Participants' (ie people significantly targeted by #SpyCops).
The group I represent are deeply angry that the next stage of the Inquiry is delayed until next year campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/2021/04/20/new…
Mitting interjects to say that someone from the SWP has joined the Inquiry & getting them up to speed will cause the delay.
Read 54 tweets
23 Apr
Next at the #SpyCopsInquiry, James Scobie QC, representing Richard Chessum and “Mary”. They were spied on by #Spycops officer Richard Clark ('Rick Gibson' 1974-76).
We were told to make this statement by 14 April as we'd have had material about the spycops a few weeks earlier, but some was provided late, little on officer Colin Clark & nothing at all on officer Phil Cooper. We cannot be talking about our case properly
The #SpyCopsInquiry is looking at those who were spied on, not those who were doing the spying who should be the focus. Is this all deliberate?
Read 62 tweets
23 Apr
The #SpyCopsInquiry now hears from Heather Williams QC representing Category F Core Participants, Relatives of Deceased Individuals whose identities were stolen by #SpyCops as the basis for their fake persona
Families suffered the horror of a child dying. Then they suffered the horror of finding out about #SpyCops violation because of their bereavement. It was in the perios being examined, 1973-82, that the practice became standard.
How did it start?At what level was it condoned? Were there no alternatives? They've been waiting for answers for year - Barbara Shaw found out in 2013, her health is failing, yet still she waits for answers
Read 42 tweets
22 Apr
Finally today at the #SpyCopsInquiry, an opening statement from Matthew Ryder QC. He is representing anti-apartheid activists Ernest Rodker, Professor Jonathan Rosenhead & Lord Peter Hain, as well as Blair Peach's partner Celia Stubbs.
From the 1960s there was a large anti apartheid movement around the world. They were right, and their opponents were wrong. The British government appeased & supported a regime it should have opposed.
It should be a matter of deep regret that #spycops targeted anti apartheid campaigners. The real threat to democracy was apartheid itself.
Read 62 tweets
22 Apr
The #SpyCopsInquiry resumes with an opening statement from Phillippa Kaufmann QC, representing 'Category H Core Participants' (Individuals in Relationships with Undercover Officers)
It's clear that in the era examined 1973-82, numerous #SpyCops had sexual relationships with women - those they spied on & those they came into contact with socially while undercover.
We were told it was infrequent, but the documents now give a different picture. 8 officers in 5 years. HN300 & perhaps HN67 had children with women they'd spied on.
Read 53 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!