Anyone who accepts or supports top-down, hierarchical social relations is authoritarian.
Both Liberals and Conservatives are authoritarian by this metric, since they support Capitalism.
Forces Libs and Conservatives typically label “authoritarian” are usually authoritarian too.
What most Liberals, Conservatives, and authoritarian “Leftists” don’t grasp is that anything truly “Left” is where direct democracy begins, and exploitation + domination ends.
Hierarchy and extraction, whether upheld by private corporations or a state, can only be authoritarian.
Look past surface aesthetics and rhetoric and ask yourself these questions when evaluating whether or not political orgs and/or tendencies are authoritarian:
Are they okay with hierarchy and individual leaders giving orders from the top? Are these “leaders” instantly recallable?
Worth noting that there are both formal and informal hierarchies, and different forms of authority.
The key question is whether or not these hierarchies or authorities have been consented to and are recallable, or if they have been imposed.
Hierarchies, however, beget problems.
The paradigm we are currently suffering under is a paradigm of authoritarianism.
Whether you’re in the U.S. or China, you most likely have someone ordering you around and monitoring your every move each day.
What happens to most if they refuse these orders?
They starve or die.
Our education systems are authoritarian too. No matter where you’re born on this planet, odds are that you’ll spend your developmental years being primed for authoritarian working conditions in service to profit (capital) and the wider capitalist system of domination via schools.
For many of us, our “teachers” were our first “bosses.”
We were raised to accept and respect top-down authority.
This top-down authority ultimately serves the wider system of domination that we live under.
Anything “Left” has to break from these authoritarian social relations.
There is something to be said about authoritarianism within the home (the reality/truth is that parents/guardians can tend to be the first “bosses” that we have), but perhaps that’s a conversation for another day. 😏
BONUS:
A beautiful statement all of the way back from 1898 (signed by Kropotkin, Reclus, and others) about our authoritarian education systems, and the need for a holistic, liberatory alternative in service to freedom.
The State of Israel is a settler-colonialist nation-state just like the USA, so recent IOF attacks on Palestinians at their place of worship in East Jerusalem come as no surprise.
The solution, however, doesn’t lie in more bourgeois nationalism and statism, let alone Capitalism.
Various forces – political, religious, etc. – exploit the violent, reactionary acts of the Israeli nation-state against the Palestinian people to push their own agendas.
These agendas almost never have anything to do with freedom, but rather more forms or flavors of domination.
The solution lies in transcending the nation-state model, theocracy, and the capitalist system altogether.
The solution lies in a global, confederal system that does away with colonial borders, and is defined by *directly* democratic social, economic, and political organization.
When are we going to confront the reality that countless “Left” media personalities are directly and indirectly complicit in perpetuating the narrative that there is no way out, simply by critiquing *what is*, without exploring (in very practical, accessible terms) *what can be*?
One of the most insidious elements of this phenomenon is that it is actually driven by the logics of these social media platforms most of us use to communicate.
Talking heads channel our righteous rage into low-hanging-fruit “takes” instead of informational seeds for liberation.
“Organize locally,” “join a union,” and “make sure to vote in your local elections” are frequently empty, meaningless, vague, footnote talking points anchored in zero political programs, and in what are typically broader discussions about horrible recent events, or personalities.
While it is tiring to have to revisit and re-explain concepts and methodology we have been acting on for years now, it is absolutely necessary, and we *need* each other.
All we ask is that people do their due diligence in research.
For a more expansive breakdown of the history of “dual power” specifically, please see the thread below.
As people become more open to the idea that Capitalism is trash, don’t leave them hanging without suggestions for what the institutional alternatives could be, and how we can build them!
Anticapitalist slogans are great, but they are not enough.
People want practical solutions.
We have new (and much more accessible) resources and materials regarding “institutional alternatives” and organization on the way, but the thread below is a great place to start.
As much as “progressive,” Social Democratic politicians talk about “democracy” and throw around the word “grassroots,” you’d think more of them would be interested in moving campaigns that help poor and working-class people build grassroots, direct democracy in their communities.
The “politician” role is an inherently *top-down* role under our current socioeconomic paradigm and system of governance.
Therein lies the contradiction for “progressives.”
Even amongst so-called “progressives,” the implicit/assumed orientation is an orientation of paternalism.
“Democracy” is a concept only spoken to in the context of “representative democracy.”
“Grassroots” is a concept only spoken to in the context of “grassroots” efforts to elect new “representatives” or “leaders.”
Very few politicians are interested in addressing these conundrums.
The 300,000+ indigenous Mayans who make up the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) in Chiapas, Mexico have one of the most advanced systems of democratic, consensus-based governance in the world.
Here are some clips from “People Without Faces” (2016) that explain.
“Suggest, but do not impose.
Represent, but do not replace.
Build, but do not ruin.
Obey, but do not dictate.
Descend to the people, but do not dominate.
Persuade, but do not defeat.
Serve the others, but not yourself.”
“If there is some profit remaining from the work, the representative gathers all of the families of the support base, and they make a decision on how to use that profit, where to invest it.”