This thread—which reaches its riotously discrediting climax by describing Bernie-supporting, Vox-podcasting @mattyglesias as a "fancy Rush Limbaugh"—is one of the dumbest things you'll ever read on this site.
Basically what's happening is that you have a Twitter subculture incapable of interpreting disagreement with progressive identitarian conceptions of race as anything other than red-pilled reactionary Limbaughism.
This group has lost the capacity to intelligently discriminate among the various forms of dissent they come across online. You've reached galactic levels of absurdity when your grand theory is that Matt Yglesias is Rush Limbaugh with a smile.
The author egregiously begs the question, and tips his hand, by equating the manifestly justified belief that today's political correctness strictures are a bit heavy-handed with the obviously morally horrifying view that "a little racism and homophobia are okay."
Roundabout way of saying, "Think political correctness is a problem? Think cancel culture is real? Why are you basically Tucker Carlson?"
"Oh, '#AbolishPrisons' sounds 'unworkable' to you? You think 'looting' is morally problematic, do you? I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was having a conversation with SEAN PATRICK HANNITY!"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Berny Belvedere

Berny Belvedere Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bernybelvedere

23 Apr
Can you imagine looking like Efron used to look and thinking that your face needed surgical modification?
C’mon Image
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
Gary Neville is a hysterical nut case. I don’t think anyone was this worked up about Hitler bombing London. He’s offered no real argument for why the Super League would be bad. Just that it would be a “monopoly,” which isn’t the case.
Getting a lot of good pushback on this. So I want to explain my reasons for thinking this is a good development.
First, an uncontroversial metric of soccer enjoyment is being able to see the biggest matches and best players. We all circle the big games on the calendar; we all tune in for the most exciting players.

This first argument is simple: The SL reliably gives us more of these games.
Read 12 tweets
19 Apr
Am I going to run a correction to a *tweet* in which I blast Greenwald for boosting Revolver News without qualifying it as a cess pit of conspiratorial chuddery?

No, I don’t think I will.
I do lament the fact that, in conversation with one of my own editors, I was too dismissive of the possibility that the death wasn’t connected to Jan 6.
Greenwald was accidentally right. For a lot of people following the coverage, there was little reason to doubt the official narrative. Aside from just, you know, having a dorm room skepticism to “official narratives” to begin with.
Read 7 tweets
19 Apr
Without minimizing the genuine hardships many people have endured in recent times, I would put some pressure on the conceptual link here between "living through" something and metrics of personal growth like becoming tougher or becoming more resilient.
That's because we use "living through" ambiguously.

Sometimes it refers to *actively participating in x* and other times it means something closer to *being alive during x.*
"Living through" boot camp will make me tougher, yes.

"Living through" a depression, if my job was safe and my industry remained relatively strong throughout, won't.
Read 5 tweets
18 Apr
Hmmm ... why don’t we ask Dennis Prager? ImageImage
This guy DMs every two months to absolutely wreck me with facts and logic ImageImage
lmao I just looked up his username and it appears he does this to others too. Legend.
Read 4 tweets
17 Apr
I agree with idea that a lot of mainstream media underserves “unwoke readers.”

My hot take is that, by being that way, they also underserve “woke readers”—because a robust and effective presentation of left identitarianism is enhanced by sharing space with heterodox dissidents.
The infinite hard-on these chuds get from assigning the term “reactionary” to everything they dislike could power the galaxy ImageImage
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!