Over the last year, government has been repeatedly evasive about who paid for the refurb. What have they been hiding & why?
Given what we know a text from a friend of the Prime Minister can get from this government, how far could a discreet donation for a luxury refurb get you?
The cover up of the No.10 refurb is the tip of the iceberg of Tory sleaze.
We need transparency around the timeline, details of who knew what and when, and an explanation as to what was so sensitive that the Head of the Civil Service had to be put in charge of the matter.
Labour will be writing to government with urgent questions they must actually engage with and answer, if they want to reassure taxpayers and start cleaning up this Tory sleaze.
It's deeply misleading to claim they've "engaged" with Labour on this, but typical of this government.
Rather, they've ignored all our questions and failed to publish the Register of Ministers’ Interests. There needs to be a full investigation into this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
By Monday afternoon, Boris Johnson was starting to feel the heat as more lines from Cameron and Greensill lobbying and sleaze were drawn to ministers in his government.
So he announced a review - one that looked very much like a cover up.
Over the last year, we've seen a growing catalogue of Tory cronyism and waste.
With jobs in the balance and huge sums of taxpayer money spent, today’s @thesundaytimes investigation on Greensill underlines again why this must stop.
Here’s what's unfolded this week - a thread.⬇️
The more we scratch under the surface of Greensill, the more worrying it becomes.
We need a thorough investigation into how Cameron lobbied for Greensill, and what role government played in such a hugely irresponsible company getting so much access. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Then there’s the luxury refurb of the Prime Minister’s flats at No.10 Downing Street, where questions continue to amass but answers seem in short supply.
@SarahOwen_ wrote to the Cabinet Secretary with some of the questions this week - the list is long.
The news about Serco today will outrage taxpayers.
Its their money - meant to fund a contact tracing system which has never been up to scratch - that is now instead being paid to Serco shareholders via dividends. 1/6 ft.com/content/0dca97…
This is also the company, who said in a leaked letter, that Covid was an opportunity for them to cement themselves into our NHS supply chain. 2/6 theguardian.com/society/2020/j…
This whole saga is typical of this government’s appalling waste during the pandemic.
They should have done with contract tracing as was with the vaccine - placed it in the hands of our NHS and local communities, instead of using it to hand huge profits to Serco. 3/6
What exactly happened with Public First yesterday, and revelations that both Dominic Cummings and Michael Gove were linked to a lucrative Covid contract awarded to them?
Discovering the truth of that has been months in the making. THREAD 🧵
In March, Public First won a contract for £840,000 - they ended up being paid around £500,000 - without tender or a written contract.
Both Gove & Cummings said they had nothing to do with the award, despite links with heads of Public First, including work on 2019 Tory Manifesto.
Then in May (around a month after Cummings made his infamous Barnard Castle trip), the contract was retrospectively awarded.
This is one of the troubling practices the National Audit Office highlighted in their report into pandemic procurement at the hands of this government.