WSJ: By a large margin, Americans oppose the idea of increasing the number of justices serving on the U.S. Supreme Court. That’s according to a new nationwide survey conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy.
2. The survey also finds little support for ending the legislative filibuster in the U.S. Senate.
Poll participants were asked the following question:
3. A full 65% of respondents said he should not, while just 31% said that he should and 4% weren’t sure. It’s no surprise that 95% of Republicans oppose the plan to expand the court, but independents in the survey also resoundingly rejected the idea, with a full 72% opposing it.
4. Even among Democrats the idea has its share of critics, with a third of Democrats saying Biden should not back the proposal. And 90% of Democrats admit it is a partisan venture.
5. Mason-Dixon pollster Brad Coker finds consistently strong opposition among independents to such plans for structural changes, and concludes that moderate and unaffiliated voters did not vote for Joe Biden in 2020 “to turn the government upside-down” or “remake America.”
6. Rather, the independents were hoping Biden would bring calm and perhaps “less bickering” to Washington, he adds.
The End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Income inequality" is a fancy phrase invented by those who are always looking for ways to malign free market capitalism in America. While I understand the emotional tug of that phrase, please know that this phrase is fundamentally dishonest.
2. What matters for the economic wellbeing of a society is not a static picture of income distribution, but a dynamic picture over time of income mobility. Starting at the bottom rung is never a problem, so long as there are no artificial impediments to moving up the ladder.
3. At some times and places, there have been whole classes of people who lived permanently in poverty or in luxury. But, in the United States today, the percentage of Americans who fit either description does not reach beyond single digits.
1. WSJ: Michigan Woman Defies State Travel Advisory
This is a delightful gem from WSJ. Enjoy!
Lansing resident sensibly visits vaccinated father who lives in Florida, where protection of seniors is prioritized.
2. At least one Michigan resident has had it with the state’s seemingly endless series of aggressive and ineffective restrictions and recommendations against individual liberty.
3. And she just might inspire a nationwide revolt against Covid rules that continue to burden citizens in many states—even after the administration of more than 213 million vaccine doses nationwide.
The Federal Reserve has created more than $3.5 trillion since the start of the Covid panic and all those dollars have to go somewhere.
2. Lately they seem to be going everywhere. Great companies, decent companies, weak companies with entertaining Internet memes and even businesses created as jokes are now getting funded.
3. Some highly valued assets combine the best elements of both jokes and memes. A cryptocurrency that was created as a joke exploded on Wall Street on Monday, with a surge in dogecoin sending its 2021 return above 8,100%—more than double the gains on the S&P 500 since 1988.
Despite the endless mocking, what Dr. Fauci is saying is not stupid. His problem is his dogged determination not to take a leadership role that has been thrust upon him, and his insistence on being a lab coat and nothing more, while also basking in the glory of media attention.
Dr. Fauci's problem is about never answering a simple question in a meaningful way, and always coming across as evasive. It's incumbent upon him to answer the question: "What conditions will have to be met for him to feel comfortable to recommend cessation of a mask requirement?"
I would find any of the following kind of answers as thoughtful and helpful to general public with regard to cessation of a mask requirement:
a) When xxx% of Americans have been vaccinated
b) When Covid death and/or hospitalization rate falls below xxx%
c) ...
Tired of misleading and hypocritical virtue signaling about “sustainable” business practices? Today let’s celebrate a CEO who decided to challenge trendy corporate wisdom about fossil fuels and school the CEO of North Face. Sit back and savor it!
2. Adam Anderson, CEO Innovex Downhole Solutions based in Texas, wrote a letter to Steve Rendle, CEO North Face, four months ago. Read this thread all the way to the end to know what caused him to do that. The rest of the thread is a serialization of this letter for the ages.
3. Adam Anderson began thus: "Mr. Rendle, we are an industry leader providing tools and technologies to service oil and natural gas products worldwide. Our work enables our customers, employees and communities to thrive." ...
Considering the volumes of commentary disagreeing with the decision to pause J&J Covid-19 vaccine administration because of a "one in a million" chance of developing blood clots, here is my speculative take on the real reason for the prudent pause.
2. The rare blood clots seen in six women within two weeks of having been given J&J Covid-19 vaccine have an anomalous nature. These blood clots were accompanied by low platelet counts.
3. It is my understanding (I am not a doctor) that this is quite anomalous, because low platelet counts usually don't cause blood clots. They are more likely to cause bleeding, because they inhibit blood-clotting.