The problem is: we expect police brutality to always look like Rodney King, George Floyd, Philando Castile, and others who are bloodied and bruised. In many instances, it’s what we hope for because it makes our arguments and calls-to-action easier.
We believe this despite us only seeing one guilty conviction in years even after repeated brutality caught on tape — and that was just 3 days ago.
And this isn’t to minimize or diminish the obvious harm we’ve witnessed or that these people have endured.
But it does manipulate us into believing that we must be defenseless, choked out, kicked, and billy clubs hit over our heads for us to experience anti-Black police violence or for us to honor the lives of Black people who have been killed by cops.
If we’re being honest, this especially happens to Black women, girls, and femmes.
Police violence doesn’t exist in a vacuum and also looks like cops having varied punitive responses to white and Black people who are in similar situations.
Police violence looks like us being able to see countless times where cops have been attacked by white people with tasers and knives and come out unscathed.
Death by police violence isn’t always going to look in a way that makes it easy for us to sleep because we can prove it to the white people we so desperately want to agree with us.
Yes, Officer Nicholas Reardson had options. Many of them. I’m sure that’s taught in the training they tout as exceptional. Don’t confuse a decision with not having many options. It’s just the one he chose. I know he had options because Ma’Khia wouldn’t be dead if she were white.
And we all know that.
So stop insulting your intelligence by doing intellectual masturbatory gymnastics to excuse Officer Reardon’s actions of shooting Ma’Khia *four* times center mass, especially when he didn’t “have” to according to Columbus Police Department’s own policy.
I’m just tired of witnessing some Black men see themselves in cops when it suits us especially because Black women defend us even when we aren’t “perfect” victims.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ll always believe that our people will be safer without police. Always.
I reflect on this often. I’ve been saying this for so long and there are many people who have been saying this much, much longer than me.
Can I see a world without police? Absolutely. Will it be in my lifetime? Of course not.
Imagining it doesn’t mean I have to experience the benefits. It means it’s how I envision a world beyond myself and for my children and my children’s children.
Ma’Khia Bryant being killed by the Columbus Police Department at the time we were awaiting a #DerekChauvin verdict proves our exact point about why this case was a drop in a bucket in the criminal punishment system. We need much more than police reform. We need abolition.
There were many things the police could have done to to de-escalate what they saw as conflict. But they don’t know how. The fact that many people can’t believe that to be true means the police have convinced us that there entire job is to kill first and ask questions later.
De-escalation does NOT require or demand using deadly force.
If the police only job is to kill people, then why do we need them? We could all do that.
The fact that so many people desperately believe the police HAD to kill a young Black girl is... exactly how it seems.
ANYTIME we try to criminalize COVID (mask violation/home orders/etc.) it will disproportionately impact Black people more than others. Criminalizing public health doesn’t help anyone and in fact hurts more Black people. Criminalization negatively impacts public health. Period.
This isn’t hyperbole. As more research continues being conducted, we know what the data show. BIPOC—who are already bearing the brunt of the pandemic—are more likely to be policed and punished for COVID-related orders. Criminalization is not a solution. communityresourcehub.org/resources/unma…
What we must focus on is distribution AND administration of Black folks being vaccinated. It is important.
It’s heartbreaking that we are so used to this country “giving” us crumbs that we are expected to willingly acquiesce to the little they give us. This is not about being thankful or grateful, but about political ping-pong that will always impact marginalized folks.
As if we don’t see billions going to “democracy programs” in the same places we’ve actively started conflict and war. As if we don’t see airlines being bailed out and as if we don’t recognize corporations being given billions.
And to be clear, none of this is just given to us, which is why conditions (taxes, income levels, etc.) have been placed on it as a condition of receipt. This is OUR money.
And I want to be very clear: we know there are specific reasons Black people have a mistrust for doctors and the medical profession. There is a history of racism, sexism, LGBTQ-antagonism, and fatphobia.
Medical racism has existed and in many ways still do.
Of course people will say this was taken out of context. No.
She is speaking to the direct payment Democrats offered that Republicans did not, then called it "significant." This is what Pelosi and older Democrats do -- pivot to Republicans to make themselves seem like heroes.
And people are dying. I'm not about to argue about Nancy Pelosi and her statements. Under NO stretch of the imagination, should the word "significant" ever have been used. Ever. $1,200 was the compromise. This is not good, or a blessing, or life-changing.