History is often viewed as a series of conquests and successes resulting in a modern humans sitting at the paramount of civilization. Petroski turns this on it's head through an analysis of design and engineering failures that stimulated invention and innovation.
“Successful tests are unremarkable... Failures are remarkable. The failures always teach us more than the successes about the design of things.”
This quote resoonated with me. How often in AAR's do we focus on what ‘went well’ and try to minimize of ignore issues or problems?
3⬆️3⬇️
This reaction to failure is understandable, no one wants to feel like a failure. If we fail, who would trust us on the next mission? What would our evals look like? Isn't it better to just highlight the good?
It takes #PersonalCourage to identify our own failure and #Loyalty -and tact- to honestly identify the failures of others.
“In general, campaign projects have to be adjusted to conditions (time, weather), the number of the enemy. ...the more one foresees obstacles to his [sic] plans the less one will find them later in the execution...
“In a word, everything must be foreseen; find the problems and resolve them.” ~Frederick the Great images.app.goo.gl/795S4xJXCwAMrF…
ADP 5-0 The Operations Process discusses anticipating and adapting to changing circumstances. Both critical to planning at all levels. Not to eliminate uncertainty but to develop a framework and acknowledge it. bit.ly/3eqRgPM
“Failure of an existing thing or technology provides not only the initial motivation for seeking an improvement in some thing or process but also the means if incrementally developing ideas and prototypes”
.@USArmy_CALL leads the Army Lessons Learned Program that gives leaders the methodology to identify and obtain relevant information to resolve gaps and inform the planning process and in assessments throughout. bit.ly/2PkfuTi
“Dissatisfied customers are this the source of important feedback on designs...”
During AAR's it is paramount to document detailed observations, discussions, and recommendations.
It can be hard to solicit detailed feedback about things that went wrong. Complaints are easier than recommendations.
What should you ask about? DOTML-PF of course.
“There are two approaches to any engineering or design problem: success-based and failure-based. Paradoxically, the latter is always far more likely to succeed.”
It may not come naturally to some to call out their own failures. #Leaders must understanding that is not a weakness but a strength and a core part of getting results; essential to adapting and achieving.
“Risk and progress go and in hand.”
Being willing to fail does not mean leaders can be careless, nonchalant, or reckless. #RiskManagement ensures freedom for incremental improvements without unnecessary hazards jeopardizing people, the mission, or equipment. bit.ly/3nkxLfF
‘success through Failure’ was a great book to kick of #TheUnitLibrary#BookClub monthly #professionaldevelopment challenge. It is full of applicable lessons that go beyond design and general engineering.
I had mixed thoughts on this one. I found the overall message on point, even when disagreeing on some observations. Overall, an engaging anthology on leadership.
I anticipated reading 'Leaders Eat Last' during this challenge. I enjoyed Sinek's TED talk and his book 'Start with Why' (September's book) was one of the first LPD books I picked up. ted.com/speakers/simon…
"...exceptional organizations all have cultures in which leaders provide cover from above and the people on the ground look out for each other." p9
“I don’t divide the world into the weak and the strong, the successes and the failures...I divide the world into the learners and the non learners.” ~ Benjamin Barber
As Army leaders, we are charged with subordinate development. Of all the challenges to this outcome, maybe the most significant is the idea that some Soldiers are incapable of being developed.
In 1921, the armed forces would not be integrated for another 27 years. WAAC would not be actualized for 21, and American Women’s right to vote was recognized less that a year prior.
‘John Brown: A Biography of American abolitionist’ by W.E.B. Du Bois. A fascinating telling of the antebellum abolitionist whose belief -"Slavery is wrong"- thrust him and into a personal war to uproot an institution older than the nation he loved.
Du Bois, the author, and civil rights activist was born in 1868 and was raised during the postbellum period where he advocated vehemently against lynching, segregation, and discrimination.
1909, the year he first published his biography of John Brown was the NAACP was founded in NY in response to continued violence against Black Americans. bit.ly/2T8rloV
We are charged to care for our Soldiers. To do this we must know our them. My first questions to any Soldier is where are you from, why are you here, what is your story?
Never degrade a Soldier for who they are. Respect is foundational to the #ArmyEthic. Will you have disagreements? They are inevitable, but honesty without tact is cruel and callous. #DoBetter
“Seeing men as the default human is fundamental to the structure of human society.”
‘What? No. Really?’ The first line, and already my bias was showing. A common occurrence through the meticulously presented data of how at every turn, half the world’s population is let down.
It is no wonder that “Women will buy books by and about men, but men won’t buy books by and about women (or at least not many.)” I noted that my reading list just form this year is skewed to male authors. (3 to 12)