Biden's "50% by 2030" pledge would require outlawing most of our reliable fossil fuel electricity and mandating mostly unreliable wind and solar electricity. This would destroy American industry, impoverish American consumers, and jeopardize American security.
THREAD
Energy schemes around the world based on “unreliables”—wind and solar—have been driving up electricity costs, harming economies, destroying domestic industries, and harming consumers. Germans pay 3X US electricity prices to get about 1/3 of their electricity from solar and wind.
Instead of learning from the failures of unreliable energy schemes, Joe Biden's pledge to eliminate 50% of our CO2 emissions by 2030, while doing nothing to decriminalize reliable nuclear power, means mandating unreliable solar and wind for almost all our electricity.
Here's more detail on how politicians, including Joe Biden, make it impossible to build new nuclear, and are actually shutting down perfectly good existing nuclear plants.
Joe Biden says that forcing Americans to rely on unreliable solar and wind will create jobs. But making electricity unreliable and unaffordable doesn’t create jobs, it destroys them. Just ask the UK aluminum industry, which “green energy” schemes are driving out of business.
Here's more detail on how mandating unreliable wind and solar creates "green joblessness."
Joe Biden says that forcing Americans to rely on unreliable solar and wind will help middle-class Americans. But the cost of energy affects the cost of everything. Skyrocketing energy costs will drive skyrocketing food, housing, healthcare, and transportation costs.
Here's more detail on how mandating solar and wind increases "energy poverty," harming middle-class and poor Americans most of all.
America is already too reliant on unreliable solar and wind. That’s why we're having increasingly disastrous blackouts in my home state of California as well as in Texas, where pro-wind policies defunded reliable and resilient power plants.
Here's more detail on how "green" policies that reward or mandate unreliable electricity from wind and solar caused last summer's CA blackouts.
Biden’s plan to force Americans to use unreliable solar and wind won’t stop global CO2 levels from rising, because China and others won’t be stupid enough to follow suit. The only thing it will bring about is an economic and security crisis in America.
The proper path forward on energy is to liberate all sources of energy, including nuclear. We need energy freedom, not government-dictated unreliable energy.
We need to recognize that CO2 emissions do impact climate but there is nothing resembling a "climate crisis." That's why climate-related disaster deaths have been rapidly declining.
The real crisis in the world is lack of energy, which afflicts billions of people who can't live modern lives. That's why the Paris Agreement is immoral for trying to outlaw fossil fuels, which means outlawing the only way to provide affordable, reliable energy for billions.
Here's more detail on why the Paris Agreement is an immoral, self-destructive agreement on paper--and why Biden's plan to implement it is far worse.
Fossil fuels and energy freedom have been making America and the world a better and better place to live. Don't let our politicians reverse that progress.
"Sorry, We Can’t Sit in the Dark While You Fly Around in a Private Jet"
Indian energy analyst @VijayJayaraj_CC has written an excellent open letter to @JohnKerry. Here are some excerpts.
Let's encourage Mr. Kerry to respond.
"back in 2004, when I was supporting you to win....350 million people in India were without electricity. The U.S population in 2004 was around 292 million. So, literally, you had more people in India without electricity than the entire population of the U.S."
"India muscled its way through in its fight against energy poverty. Coal, oil, and gas together alleviated energy poverty. By 2017, India began producing surplus electricity, and by 2019 it electrified all of its villages."
There are too many American companies who righteously embrace any fashionable cause of the moment yet sanction China's horrific abuses of human rights. @hiattf has an excellent column about this: "Do companies really want to sponsor the Genocide Olympics?" washingtonpost.com/opinions/globa…
Examples of documented Chinese abuses "woke" corporations say nothing about:
"Arbitrary or unlawful killings by the government; forced disappearances by the government"
"torture by the government"
"politically motivated reprisal against individuals outside the country"
More examples of documented Chinese abuses "woke" corporations say nothing about:
"political prisoners"
"pervasive and intrusive technical surveillance and monitoring"
"serious restrictions on free expression, the press, and the internet, including physical attacks"
The disastrous TX blackouts should teach us that we need power plants that are 1) reliable and 2) resilient. Reliable means: they can produce as much power as we need, when we need it. Resilient means: they can keep producing power even under adverse conditions.
One key to resilience is "on-site fuel storage"--keeping a large amount of fuel at a power plant so that it can produce power even during a supply disruption. The champions at on-site fuel storage are coal and nuclear, which can cheaply keep months of fuel on hand.
Natural gas is not usually as resilient as coal and nuclear, because natural gas is expensive to store in large quantities. Most natural gas power depends on "just in time" delivery from pipelines. If pipeline transport is disrupted, many natural gas plants will go down.
When you think "Joe Biden's climate policy," think of the 13-year-old Ethiopian girl who will have to keep spending 8 hours a day collecting dirty water for lack of reliable, low-cost fossil fuel electricity.
"The first thing Aysha picks up when she opens her eyes...is...her collection of large plastic gasoline canisters. The 13-year-old Ethiopian straps them to her camel...and begins the four-plus-hour walk to the nearest river. The water there is dirty and brown and unsanitary..."
"President Biden’s administration...is beginning to enact policies that will deny Aysha and the countless girls like her the opportunity to move from bleak, backbreaking destitution to a self-actualized life of equality and opportunity."
The House Democrats' "CLEAN Future" Act, by forcing us to depend mostly on unreliable wind and solar, would destroy our standard of living--and global emissions would still rise.
It should be rejected in favor of an *aggressive nuclear decriminalization policy*.
THREAD
The only practical way to lower global CO2 emissions is to develop low-carbon sources that are cheaper than fossil fuels. If the US, which causes <1/6 of global emissions, mandates unaffordable low-carbon sources, we'll hurt ourselves--while global CO2 emissions continue rising.
The world, especially the developing world, overwhelmingly uses fossil fuels because that is by far the lowest-cost way for them to get reliable energy. Unreliable solar and wind can’t come close. That’s why China and India have committed to building hundreds of new coal plants.
Embarrassing: this chart in a supposed "fact-check" of @RepDanCrenshaw by @PolitiFact falsely portrays wind subsidies as unremarkable using the bogus and dishonest metric of total subsidies, not the proper metric of per-unit subsidies.
🧵
The proper way to measure energy subsidies is: How much taxpayer money does the government pay per unit of energy? Every per-unit analysis using data from the US Energy Information Administration is clear: solar and wind get *dozens of times* more subsidies than fossil fuels.
A comprehensive analysis of federal subsidies per unit of electricity generated from 2010-2019 found that solar got 211 times more subsidies than natural gas and wind got 48 times more subsidies than natural gas.