In Islam @amirazizahmedi surrender to someone unseen exists.
Dharma shall not seek one to surrender to anyone. Devotion is a just a small part of Dharma.
Dharma was there even when Vedas weren’t “articulated” in words.
Dharma's one core concept is "Cyclic Time" @amirazizahmedi which is way more rational than linear time.
But irrespective of rationality, Cyclic Time makes Islam altogether different from philosophies that emerged in the land that spoke of "Dharma" first.
That is a claim of Qur'an wherein even in Nature is declared to be following Islam "Submission" but the idea of Dharma sees that Nature and all of us are part of Parambrahm. Nature is not submitting to anyone. We praise Parabrahm, not submit.
It is for that reason that Ishvara too faced trials in concept of "Dharma".
Qur'an is confused as it talks of attributes of Allah, but calls it formless.
Which formless thing has attribute?
So what even if true? The Shastras claiming about Dharma does not recognize that Nature submits to Brahm. Rather Bhagwad Gita makes clear that everything is just part of Krishna, the Para-Brahm. It talks about cyclic time.
Easy to understand? What r u saying? Is Cyclic Time concept ever close to Linear Time ? All of a sudden so called "Allah" got a jerk and decided to make Cyclic time into linear. Cyclic Time is practical, complex it may be.
The Dharmik Shastra Gita sees everything as part of Param Brahm. It does not reduce the brilliance despite Atman being part of Parmatma.
So when we have got minutest presence of Ishvara as atom then why will be be insulted of form you give.
Dear @amirazizahmedi , it is foolish to assume that thinking of a form for Ishvara is insult to him, for it's his parts only which as "jeeva" lives everywhere around.
That is why I told you Islam can never be Dharma. There is no match.
and @amirazizahmedi we have a form called "ananta", you can't map "ananata" because you do not have canvas big enough but you can certainly map his fractals, parts.
Its stupidity to assume that it is an insult to Parabrahm.
Prambrahm is least bothered.
Sorry our Shastra doesn’t agree to it. We do Namaste which Islam doesn’t agrees.
It’s exactly Ishvara even in his part. Irrespective of quantity like water doesn’t loses its basic nature, atman being part of Parmatman is never less than him as mighty one.
I asked you that if you agree on this that Cyclic Time of Dharmik Shastras (of course Indic because Dharma was defined here), is biggest difference with Islam & hence later can't be dharma.
Well, I thought you knew about "Dharma" & hence vouched for Islam too being one of them.
Never mind. I'll tell you.
Ananta is Krishna's name because of Omnipresence. Ananta means infinite. Refer Mahābhārata, Udyoga Parva, 70.14, Anuśāsana Parva,149.83).
That is what Abrahmic idea tells. Why should Abrahmic idea supersede to tell about someone of whom former does not even mention? Well, no Shastra from Bharat accept it.
It is amazingly hilarious @amirazizahmedi that you wan to pass judgement about a personality based on idea from a book that never ever even spoke of this personality.
All you have is a fed in belief that Krishna was messenger though his words deny it.
Well you said Krishna is messenger. But Indic Shastras don't agree with it.Y would Abrahmic belief tell about a personality like Krishna whom none of your book ever talks about.
Do u believe in Krishna? If yes, hw with idea that does not even know of him?
Haha. See from morning I had been saying we should avoid binaries & concentrate on more awakening,but anyways I will answer them based on "my readings & analysis":
1)Yes, Women can read Vedas (Right is BS western concept, it divides)
2)We never had"Sati Pratha"(it was brit conspiracy). I'll never stand for even if hypothetical.
3)I stand for Gharwapasi. I thought ppl would have known my opinion by now.
4)Let us use term "Shudra". I'm against "Shudra" being a Poojari until he has attained all gunas of Brahmin.
We need to understand that having a Dalit Pujari might be symbolic only. Question is that is that Dalit strong enough to attain Brahm Gunas? In fact not many Brahmin (Birth) too have Brahm Guna