Whether "community spread" or whether "somehow acquired through an infection from laboratory tests itself"
I'll tell you where from ...
"I think this is an airborne virus and it's more infectious than we give it credit for"
My God, it's full of stars.
Wrong
No it isn't.
Then what's the point of these guidances?
Sounds like WHO. Here, do this. But if you do and you die, that's on you.
Another
How's that working out?
You aren't helping.
Fundamentally different modes? It's more infectious. You'll see more through the air. It doesn't grow wings. Delete this PDF.
Then goes on to pull from WHO (NOTE: of course people pull WHO guidance, hence it is important to change that) and Scotland, for some reason, to set PPE for health care, which we know is all wrong.
Delete this PDF.
Side note, they point to the hierarchy of controls, which would say to PHO that you ought to use airborne isolation rooms before masks.
But here's the kicker you came for, HCW in a patient room just need surgical masks.
Meanwhile site is full of "how to put on your PPE" which is fine generally, but ludicrous in the context of not wearing an N95 for airborne infectious disease.
And when studies show even when ppl study it, they cannot cough/force virus off a mask.
And here is their garbage summary of the aerosol conference. Garbage b/c they do not believe in airborne spread
Bookmarking section 217.1 of the Criminal Code (in force via the Westray Law) that creates legal duty on people overseeing work of others to take all reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to those others
While I am here perhaps it is time to start a discussion around criminal negligence causing homicide for bad medical advice/studies provided to the public.
Asking again why we have 34 indep medical officers of health handling pandemic response (or supposed to), with CMOH on top, then provincial political layer, then federal PHAC, and fed political layer ...?
VS
one central command like Taiwan (1100 cases, 12 deaths)