@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Patently FALSE.
FACTS
1.Cattle herd Brazil increased as deforestation decreased.
2.Very little feed 4 cattle.
3.90% Brazil's cattle pasture fed & beef production can be increased reducing emissions via such without deforestation (de Silva et al)
4.63% soya UK human use little👇
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB little cattle (Sus Food Trust)
5. Much cattle feed waste(FAO confirmed) as is pig feed but Oatly know all about that massive crop waste unsuitable human use
6. Pig/poultry main soya feed use: reason China losing 1.5 mill hectares yr pasture for tech, fast fashion etc 👇
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB consumerist industrialization, This is why it is pseudoscientific deceit to talk about 'food systems' isolated from other consumerism, which causes pasture loss & need for soya feed for pigs etc & of course some of that consumerism is DUE to move away from leather, wool etc co 👇
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB produce.
7. Co produce as barrier to land exploitation for alternatives such as palm oil as well as fast fashion colossal repeat production/waste because not durable, &
8. Pasture/grassland/marginal land unsuitable for crops
SHARED robust biodiversity historically proven whereas
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB monocrops associated with huge biodiversity loss because of pesticides etc and do NOT produce significant co produce, so MORE land/resources including crude oil for synthetics produced with coal powered electricity, & pure textile crops that in case of cotton have wiped out 24
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB species Aral sea and drained an entire sea in 20 yrs something millennia of wool has not. So pressure on land use must consider ALL consumerism including energy/mining/fossil fuel use, insulating capabilities durability etc & its impact on biodiversity. The energy for
such
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB production of synthetics is significant and alternatives to coal etc also engaged in significant deforestation. Mining also of course also includes mining for chemical fertilizer for crops.
9. Claims that sheep responsible for deforested landscape in UK outrageous historical
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB revisionism and again by contrast areas of sheep/cattle without crops the forests are still there millenia later as in case Balkans/Turkey. Serbia in partic contrast re biodiversity/forest pastoral south v crop north stark. Cultivation (as evidence by lynchets) & dwelling/ship
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB building UK millenia problem re timber, as well as Roman crop demands. By time Normans arrived Britain already significant deforested & for cultivation *taxed on it) not livestock (a reason gladiators were called 'barley men' & diets of all their enslaved & peasant class grain.
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB 10. Much deforestation has been for plantation crops, sugar, rubber, palm as mentioned, but also exotic fruits.
No wonder the big food corporates like Nestle are pushing plant based diets esp re sugar & palm. For most giving up sugar v meat/dairy a no brainer nutrition wise
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Planation crops of course long been associated with slavery they didn't ship slaves from Africa to be cowboys. Today is no different. Then there was the mega rice project, destroyed an area of forest size of Belgium & Indonesia embark on similarly destructive plan now re crop ag
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB for plantation crops rather than sustainable local food yields, transmigrant plan failing thus AGAIN increasing soya imports to feed, and again WEF already engaged with H&M fast fashion, & Michelin rubber, now implicated with IKEA engaged in deforestation for timber for plywood
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB So much for the WWF attempt to blame meat, while working with these major unsustainable corporates (IKEA broke model of sustainable furniture & H&M sustainable fashion). Indonesia's policy of plant based diets re an already undernourished populace while pushing plantation ag for
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB export is what is CAUSING them to be the worlds biggest deforester & WWF focused on producing mickey mouse data through fraudulent accountancy & greenwashing the corporates engaged real causes.
Now lets look exotic fruit & nut plantation crops
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB So you have cashew nuts a major new problem in Africa, and even areas finger pointing at livestock occurring actually crops are doing more damage. Come back to that point 11. Then coconuts, of course being driven partly by alternative to dairy demands
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Do we really need bananas & pineapple imports out of season? Nutritional value next to meat/dairy is poor. You'd have to eat 30 bananas to get same protein as 100gms beef. So encouraging massive plantation use via plant based diet push will exacerbate problems re plantation crops
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB 11. Subsistence crops. One of the fastest deforestation rates currently is the Congo, where meat consumption <7kgs pr yr pp, and only 300k cattle. The problem there is SUBSISTENCE agriculture. Reason being forest soil is poor & easily exhausted so commits to more, and at the rate
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB of deforestation it will all be gone by 2100. Livestock could not only provide an answer to this, but also reduce conflict in the region, reduce bushmeat stress, AND provide surplus like leather & ankole horn, sheep & goatskin etc for livelihoods in one of world poorest nations.
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Conclusion: current anti meat/dairy narrative nothing more than deflection & diversion from global corporates, WEF funded 'science' conspiring, keen to use it as further spivvery. Oatly one of those engaged & could not hide fact that
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB they have massive waste used on sly for animal feed. Animal produce, is NOT just meat/dairy, and some of the solutions they offer do NOT involve deforestation & indeed return to tallow wool leather etc can significantly reduce it, & feed with cultural & economic autonomy v
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB the slavery and corporate attempt to dominate food with pseudoscientific constructions such as 'food systems' and false accountancy. How Global Corporatism does this through funding science, partic Gates, Wellcome & Grantham are explored in the following threads
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB It is nothing more than food imperialism, and excuse for land and resources grab, and it WILL compromise the reputation of both science & media unless it is confronted as the people already can see its Orwellian doublethink. And it is on other issues eg Covid, as well as
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB food. So first up here's Our World in Data, funded by Gates, pushing the narrative his fake meat is the answer to the world's solutions , and using
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1384466…
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB a false narrative to claim livestock are reason over 100k yrs (didn't exist until c 10k ago) earth has lost much large mammal biodiversity . Here is why that's wrong & indeed ag largely response to disappearance not a cause, & growth of forest contributing threadreaderapp.com/thread/1385208…
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Now others with snouts in the Gates trough inc BBC. Guardian newspaper, and significant academic lackeys
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Now Wellcome, engaged in the plant based diet push before they even funded EATLancet
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB Then billionaire elitist who thinks Africa overpopulated, funder of WWF & Grantham institute lackey academics Jeremy Grantham. BUt first @StephenCorrySvl of Survival International explains why the WWF/WEF narrative is wrong . If you find yourself supporting shits like Grantham &
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB @StephenCorrySvl & WWF (Grantham big funder of them) & think yourself woke you need to slap yourself to wake from your delusion: blatant racist imperialism excuse conservation. He also funds drivel masquerading as science why we should farm trees not sheep: invested in woo/forestry I kid you not.
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB @StephenCorrySvl Davos in general working with the WWF who are utterly compromised by their money and excusing global corporate plunder of resources & using indigenous people & livestock farmers who do most to protect it as a scapegoat. Vile ecofascists. Then finally
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB @StephenCorrySvl threads on why looking at livestock as just food is complete FRAUD re co produce & land use
@oatly @CotswoldLadyB @StephenCorrySvl And a thread by scientist @fleroy1974 on the abuse of data re emissions of livestock

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dave Dent #GreatResist NO WEF. #NoVaccinePassports

Dave Dent #GreatResist NO WEF. #NoVaccinePassports Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DMDent

27 Apr
@docmartincohen @StartsWithABang But can't even tell you the football results, & sneers at those who take interest in such things. Whole manner can be elitist who thinks their authority is unquestionable, yet prone to making the most basic mistakes, & even engage in fraud for either money or pure conceit ImageImageImageImage
@docmartincohen @StartsWithABang or worse still, beliveing their lie is justified in pursuit of some nebulous 'greater good' without appreciating the harm it can do and scornful of those that warn. Lockown science a clear example of this, as was the huge death toll contributed to by refusal to consider ImageImageImageImage
@docmartincohen @StartsWithABang fever hospital protocol tried & tested for an experiment. That is sheer arrogance, and it FAILED yet still they push it oblivious to the huge amount of counter evidence, and the opinion of now well over 50k scientists and health professionals signatory to Great Barrington Dec. ImageImageImageImage
Read 14 tweets
26 Apr
@fleroy1974 @hairyhillfarmer Don't forget to add in the move from livestock provided co produce such as wool leather etc to fast fashion tat not durable so massive production for stuff that doesn't last a yr, or insulate (wool/sheepskin considerable fossil fuel heat saving pp). Because its hard to calculate,
@fleroy1974 @hairyhillfarmer doesn't man it's not hugely important. So eg this coat has lasted since 1939 (fed 2k people at time) + produced 30-80 wool garments life shearings. Millions were made affordable practical & warm little cleaning if ever required, many have lasted they are not rare; ladies
@fleroy1974 @hairyhillfarmer wore them as housecoats & threw over bed in cold weather. By contrast the average life on a fast fashion store coat now is 1 yr. So if we say, the mouton coat lasts 80 yrs, that saves cost of manufacture 80 coats synthetic made from crude oil same time. This is responsible for
Read 20 tweets
25 Apr
@Otto_English Call yourself a journalist?
Inane, narrative most CERTAINLY penned from privilege not losing livelihood.
India deaths per mill 139
UK deaths per mill 1869
Yes having surge cases: what do you think lockdowns did to already undernourished VITAMIN D deficient populace you half wit?
@Otto_English Lockdowns in India will have exacerbated the problems and hit the poor hardest just as they have globally, while twats like you have cheered them on from your pampered protected jobs, when there are thousands papers on link between poverty & adverse heath outcomes
@Otto_English And for WHAT? Where is evidence they have worked?
PLENTY that they haven't worked; UK, Czech two of the strictest some of the worst death tolls, Belarus & Sweden no lockdowns (and even nations like Denmark held v Sweden but in fact had football with fans since last summer) better
Read 8 tweets
25 Apr
Global solutions based on data devoid observation/specifics colossal problem atm many areas science. Re ag, dangerous, stupid, & fraudulent eg when not considering co produce, or seeing what drives soya feed re China is industrialization for mass tat destroying their pastures
You know, there is a reason twats like Bill Gates fund Our World in Data & other WEF mob fund science that does 'global count' rather than looking at specifics. It is FRAUD, and covers for the damage they do as it obscures the relationship
More on Our World in Data, and other fraudulent use of selective yet generalized accounting here, though I did manage to find a major piece that can be used against them on that specific point of soya re

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1384466…
Read 4 tweets
22 Apr
Here I confronted GATES FUNDED (Invested lab meat) Our World In Data's drivel suggesting lab meat was way to protect wild mammals; at odds rich biodiversity livestock lands. Now a thread on why also WRONG to imply livestock/humans responsible for loss & UNSCIENTIFIC codswallop.
Ritchie reduces 100k of history to a few sweeping statements re loos of their biomass. She is not the only person to be engaged in this narrative; other poor correlation studies on it. The loss of megafauna, which hominids had hunted for millenia, were all suddenly lost
at virtually the same time, at end of the Younger Dryas; in itself an abrupt change from what had been gradual warming many had vanished. Doesn't even seem conceivable now, given the new estimated dates of humans in America being much earlier, that they were implicated as cause
Read 19 tweets
21 Apr
@philritz1 Well the lockdowns & working from home or on furlough complacent elite have put paid to the jobs bit for working class & self employed rather effectively, and take a look at the high st not many shops left apart from £1 stores & charity shops
@philritz1 So atm, with vast well to do people working in the suburbs instead of commuting, this is going to destroy thousands of jobs permanently & turn cites into ghost towns no jobs = no money to spend in centres. VERY ill conceived like everything planners come up with who have never
@philritz1 lived in the last hi rise dystopian damp infected piss stench lift utopia they came up with. And corporates have abandoned cities already for their out of town shop centres, knowing there's no money/access to centres; lockodwns will kill off much what is left: the Labour council
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!