I’ve been thinking about how mainstream “autism advocacy” groups operate differently than organizations like the United Spinal Association.
Autism Speaks et al. rely on fear and search for “causes & treatments” whereas United Spinal is disability rights & advocacy oriented.
When you search “autism foundation,” Autism Speaks is the first search result.
When you search “spinal cord injury foundation,” United Spinal Association is the first result.
I’m comparing the two because they are both disability-focused organizations. So, let’s look at them.
First, let’s look at United Spinal. Here’s their mission statement.
The majority of their members & leadership (including the CEO) have spinal cord injuries themselves- as you can see in the photo.
United Spinal is focused on empowerment, self-advocacy, human rights, and access to supports.
Notice that they aren’t focused on treatments, cures, the economic cost of disability, etc.
Autism Speaks, on the other hand, is not run by autistic people. AS currently has only one autistic person on their board of directors.
Many of the board members are former (or current) heads of corporations, investment firms, etc.
And what do they focus on?
They focus on finding “autism genes” (so that they can edit or modify autistic people’s genes to make us non-autistic), “treatments,” & highlighting the economic cost of autistic people’s existence.
There is no mention of self-advocacy on any of the main tabs of their website.
Why is this discrepancy so large?
I believe it’s because autism is a uniquely social condition.
By our very nature, autistic people force others to question what it means to be human and why they put so much emphasis on certain things (like eye contact, or enjoying parties).
Because autistic people are viewed as “inadequately social,” we are therefore viewed as “inadequately human” in the most basic, fundamental sense.
So, self-appointed “real humans” believe not only that the way we are is wrong, but that we can’t speak or advocate for ourselves.
Communication, self-awareness, political opinions, understanding of others, etc. are all things that autistic people are supposed to inherently lack because of “social deficits.”
Those are all key self-advocacy and organizing skills, which people think we aren’t capable of.
The fact that so many autistic self-advocates exist is enough to shatter the belief that autistic people are socially “deficient.”
Yet, we are ignored and spoken over by non-autistic people and organizations who wish to maintain that myth in service to their own egos.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My longest-lasting friendships/relationships have been with people who communicate bluntly with me.
Autistic people’s communication style is often straightforward, and we can find it hard to maintain relationships with people who don’t return the favor of being an open book.
Dancing around feelings, dropping hints, avoiding conflict, keeping secrets, etc. are a recipe for disaster when trying to communicate with me.
Because I will keep asking about things and expecting a straight answer.
I can’t function without knowing exactly what’s going on.
Sometimes it can be hard for people to talk about certain feelings, etc. But just letting me know the basics saves everyone a lot of stress.
I think a lot of neurotypical people feel too vulnerable and exposed by that kind of bluntness.
Yesterday I remembered that when I was around 6-7 years old, I learned how to make origami foxes in my art class at school.
Then, when I got home, I cut up a bunch of pieces of paper into squares, and then proceeded to make what ended up as over 200 foxes in just a few days.
They were all different sizes, but a substantial portion of them were smaller than a thumbtack.
I was meticulous, and the repetition of folding in the same pattern constantly didn’t bore me, it made me excited and happy.
I was so proud of how many there were.
That weekend, I scooped all of the foxes up and put them in a giant ziplock bag, then took them to church so I could give some away to people.
The congregants were astonished at my “patience” and “attention to detail.”
Looking back, this is such a classic autistic story.
Next For Autism and their partner organization, the Center For Autism and the Developing Brain (CFADB), are currently engaged in a gaslighting campaign against the autistic community.
Both organizations have changed & erased things from their websites, without acknowledging it.
First, NEXT added “Statement of Purpose” and “FAQ” tabs to their About section.
I was surprised to see that they didn’t have an FAQ section at all before they faced backlash for their association with CFADB and promotion of ABA therapy.
In the FAQ section (created as a PR front to deflect backlash, but never named as such) they say “[NEXT] provides no funding or support for research into the cause or cure of autism.”
At the time they wrote that, CFADB still had “causes, treatment, and prevention” on their site.
You’ll have to scroll down for a bit but you’ll find it soon enough. It’s not very far down. You can also do ctrl+F and type “Suzanne” if that’s easier.
But in case you don’t want to go through the Wayback Machine, I took screenshots for everyone :)
I’m up thinking about #ColorTheSpectrum (the media event with non-autistic celebrities, scheduled for April 30th, to raise money for an organization called Next For Autism that’s funding research to “prevent” autism).
And I keep wondering why so many people think this is okay.
Not a single member of NFA’s team is autistic. Not one of them.
And the CEO, Gillian Leek, also founded The Center for Autism and The Developing Brain.
Donations to NFA will go to that center. So what’s in the mission statement?
Ah, I see. Eugenics.
The most heartbreaking thing about this is that none of the celebrities participating in #ColorTheSpectrum are autistic, and none of the people who run NFA are autistic either.
How much longer do we have to scream, “Nothing about us without us!!” before people listen?
In one of my classes yesterday, we were talking about Sufi people who spin and chant repetitively as a form of worship & spiritual practice.
It made me think about how repetitive movement & vocalization is present in every religion I can think of (Praying the rosary, etc.)
In those contexts, repetitive movements like spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, touching & moving beads, etc. are not only socially acceptable- they’re praised as signifiers of devoted worship.
Chanting is the same. Repeating a word, phrase, or script over and over.
To me as an autistic person, all of this is familiar.
Stimming and echolalia are the words used to describe the same actions listed above, when done by autistic people.
Our repetitive actions are rarely praised. Often, we are punished or forced to stop instead.