My longest-lasting friendships/relationships have been with people who communicate bluntly with me.
Autistic people’s communication style is often straightforward, and we can find it hard to maintain relationships with people who don’t return the favor of being an open book.
Dancing around feelings, dropping hints, avoiding conflict, keeping secrets, etc. are a recipe for disaster when trying to communicate with me.
Because I will keep asking about things and expecting a straight answer.
I can’t function without knowing exactly what’s going on.
Sometimes it can be hard for people to talk about certain feelings, etc. But just letting me know the basics saves everyone a lot of stress.
I think a lot of neurotypical people feel too vulnerable and exposed by that kind of bluntness.
But I thrive with it.
While bluntness, directness, brutal honesty, etc. are associated with autistic communication, I’ve been lucky enough to have a decent number of non-autistic friends who can & do communicate that way with me.
It makes our interactions flow much easier than they would otherwise.
Honesty in romantic relationships is important too. One great thing about my relationship with Abby is that both of us are blunt about everything.
Neither of us have to worry about how the other person is feeling, etc.
We just tell each other, even when the answer is tough.
I think that everyone could benefit from the kind of honesty that’s present in my relationships with other autistic people.
It allows for a deep connection, and a very strong foundation of trust.
You can count on the other person to tell you exactly what’s on their mind.
Autistic people tend to explicitly state things that are usually left unsaid.
At a camp for autistic people I attended, it was common for me to witness people saying things like “I’m sitting next to you because I like you,” or “That was a joke” (after making an obvious joke).
Things like that would probably be seen by non-autistic people as “awkward” and “inappropriate” but at this camp nobody batted an eye.
In fact, the response I heard from the person who was told “I’m sitting next to you because I like you” was “Aw, thanks! I like you too.”
This kind of total transparency is something I wish the non-autistic world could learn to accept and work with.
You might not be used to it, and it might throw you off at first.
But it’s an opportunity that everyone could take, to be more vulnerable and practice honesty.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday I remembered that when I was around 6-7 years old, I learned how to make origami foxes in my art class at school.
Then, when I got home, I cut up a bunch of pieces of paper into squares, and then proceeded to make what ended up as over 200 foxes in just a few days.
They were all different sizes, but a substantial portion of them were smaller than a thumbtack.
I was meticulous, and the repetition of folding in the same pattern constantly didn’t bore me, it made me excited and happy.
I was so proud of how many there were.
That weekend, I scooped all of the foxes up and put them in a giant ziplock bag, then took them to church so I could give some away to people.
The congregants were astonished at my “patience” and “attention to detail.”
Looking back, this is such a classic autistic story.
Next For Autism and their partner organization, the Center For Autism and the Developing Brain (CFADB), are currently engaged in a gaslighting campaign against the autistic community.
Both organizations have changed & erased things from their websites, without acknowledging it.
First, NEXT added “Statement of Purpose” and “FAQ” tabs to their About section.
I was surprised to see that they didn’t have an FAQ section at all before they faced backlash for their association with CFADB and promotion of ABA therapy.
In the FAQ section (created as a PR front to deflect backlash, but never named as such) they say “[NEXT] provides no funding or support for research into the cause or cure of autism.”
At the time they wrote that, CFADB still had “causes, treatment, and prevention” on their site.
You’ll have to scroll down for a bit but you’ll find it soon enough. It’s not very far down. You can also do ctrl+F and type “Suzanne” if that’s easier.
But in case you don’t want to go through the Wayback Machine, I took screenshots for everyone :)
I’m up thinking about #ColorTheSpectrum (the media event with non-autistic celebrities, scheduled for April 30th, to raise money for an organization called Next For Autism that’s funding research to “prevent” autism).
And I keep wondering why so many people think this is okay.
Not a single member of NFA’s team is autistic. Not one of them.
And the CEO, Gillian Leek, also founded The Center for Autism and The Developing Brain.
Donations to NFA will go to that center. So what’s in the mission statement?
Ah, I see. Eugenics.
The most heartbreaking thing about this is that none of the celebrities participating in #ColorTheSpectrum are autistic, and none of the people who run NFA are autistic either.
How much longer do we have to scream, “Nothing about us without us!!” before people listen?
In one of my classes yesterday, we were talking about Sufi people who spin and chant repetitively as a form of worship & spiritual practice.
It made me think about how repetitive movement & vocalization is present in every religion I can think of (Praying the rosary, etc.)
In those contexts, repetitive movements like spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, touching & moving beads, etc. are not only socially acceptable- they’re praised as signifiers of devoted worship.
Chanting is the same. Repeating a word, phrase, or script over and over.
To me as an autistic person, all of this is familiar.
Stimming and echolalia are the words used to describe the same actions listed above, when done by autistic people.
Our repetitive actions are rarely praised. Often, we are punished or forced to stop instead.