The promotion of these far-right gun proposals as “constitutional carry” is really bizarre, given how earlier generations of conservatives had a *very* different understanding of the 2nd Amendment.
Here’s Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Nixon appointee, talking about how the NRA had committed the greatest “fraud” by spinning the 2A into much more than it was.
We can only imagine what Goldwater, Reagan and Burger would make of today's era, in which we have an epidemic of mass shootings and yet even looser gun laws.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The brilliant @AriBerman made a guest appearance in my seminar on the political history of civil rights, and I'm delighted to report that he *nailed* the dress code.
We look like the waitstaff at a restaurant that uses the phrase "farm-to-table" waaaaaaay too much.
We look like the backup singers to a Conway Twitty performance on "Hee Haw."
No noticeable side effects, except for having the chorus to “River Deep, Mountain High” stuck in my head, but that’s *probably* because we watched the Tina Turner documentary last night.
Update 2:
Other than a sore arm and a slightly pfoggy pfeeling, doing pfine.
This thread doesn't just show that the filibuster does, in fact, have a considerable "racial history" but that the argument of its defenders -- that it somehow promotes compromise -- is completely wrong.
When Southern Democrats filibustered anti-lynching bills in the 1930s, they walked away with a total victory. The bills never became law, and no compromise measures were passed.
The filibusterers won everything they wanted. Their opponents got nothing.