THREAD: Fair Play For Women has provided detailed written feedback to @Englandrugby regarding its proposed updates to its transgender eligibility policy. You can read our findings here /1 fairplayforwomen.com/rfu_transgende…
*Women’s rugby is a sex category not a gender category*.
The word ‘sex’ is rarely used. By failing to frame the issues in terms of sex the needs of women and girls have not been adequately described nor accommodated. /2
*The policy priorities are confused & contradictory.*
The policy speaks of safety, fairness & inclusion but is unclear and inconsistent about how these policy objectives are prioritised or ‘balanced’. As such, the policy gives an unrealistic impression of what it can deliver /3
*The policy lacks essential detail on which basis decisions regarding inclusion & exclusion will be made*.
Decision-making should be readily describable. If this process cannot be clearly defined then it is unlikely to be reproducible or reliable, and is not fit for purpose. /4
*The policy fails to evidence safe and fair access to contact rugby for women and girls*.
RFU gives no account of how or why its domestic policy differs from that enacted by its International Federation. /5
*Alternative options have been rejected without expert input or player feedback*.
While the opportunity to provide critical feedback on the draft policy is welcomed, the consultation process has been limited to one approach only. /6
*The policy fails all stakeholder groups; it neither assures safety and fairness nor does it maximise trans and non-binary inclusion in contact rugby*
Balance can be achieved ACROSS the range of categories on offer but it cannot be achieved WITHIN a single category /7
A detailed analysis of our full findings is here /8
Asked about the government delay, @FiLiA_charity says we must take enough time to make policy that works for everyone, which needs proper democratic discussion, to strike a position and policy which is balanced.
@Womans_Place_UK what has made the debate toxic is the insistence that any objection has been transphobic. There's been a failure by bodies that have a duty to foster good relations, like @EHRC. it's been left to grassroots women's groups to take personal risks.
NW: When we did speak to people on the streets, they didn't call us transphobic, they said thank you for explaining the issues. It is not hateful to do this. The effect on women and girls has to be discussed.
Today @EnglandRugby has launched a 2 week external consultation on it proposed transgender inclusion policy. A link to the survey and a promotional video to accompany the draft policy can be found here /1 englandrugby.com/about-rfu/rfu-…
In contrast to the @WorldRugby decision to restrict elite women's rugby to female players only, @Englandrugby will continue allow male people who identity as women to play community women's rugby /2
In the video they say this
"The policy aims to strike a balance between fairness, inclusion and safe participation."
"The RFU has considered measures to safeguard and mitigate as far as reasonably possible any risks to players". /3
Thank you to Baroness Noakes @1SVN for submitting this series of parliamentary questions following the consent order signed by @ONS that Census law does not allow sex to be redefined to include self-identified sex. We look forward to the answers by 31st March /1
You think you are doing the right thing. It’s time to open your eyes. Your own people are doing the work of transactivists and you’ll be the one left carrying the can /2
LGBT means trans-focused, at the expense of other groups, especially women. Gender ideology is now deeply embedded within most organisations and it’s your own staff facilitating it. Stonewall and co can keep their hands clean & orchestrate the erasure of sex from a distance /3
Government departments have questions to answer of the Census debacle. This was not an isolated incident caused by legal slip up by the @ONS. The unlawful guidance was advised and supported by many other public bodies /1
On Sunday 14th March on @BBCPolitics#marr we heard Sir Ian Diamond, Head of ONS tell us "It's a very simple question. What is your sex".
But, just days before, in High Court the @ONS was telling us it wasn’t a simple question at all. /2
Sir James Eadie QC was arguing for the @ONS that sex was an “umbrella concept” and such a “difficult question” that without guidance some people would be unable to answer it. He argued there were “5 concepts of sex” and that the definition of sex wasn’t “hermetically sealed” /3
Judge: Mr Justice Swift
Defence Counsel: Sir James Edie QC
Claimant Counsel: Mr Jason Coppel QC
/1
Permission for live tweeting granted by the Judge.
Some IT technical issues delaying the start of the hearing /2
Claimants Counsel sets out the legal arguments.
Census law mandates citizens to answer "What is your sex" according to their legal sex (birth or acquired by GRC).
Guidance conflates and confuses the concepts of sex and gender identity /3