There's a far bigger cronyism scandal than Cameron's lobbying or Johnson's flat. But the media - in particular the BBC - has disgracefully failed to hold the government to account for it.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
What is so frustrating about this is that the @GoodLawProject, which arguably now does the best investigative journalism of any organisation in the UK, handed these massive stories on a plate to the media. But most of the media, most of the time, turned up their noses.
The work had already been done, so the old excuse - "it's too complicated, too expensive, too risky" - simply didn't wash. The GLP had the government bang to rights. But it got away with gross corruption, because the media, as a whole, wasn't interested.
This was not a trivial matter. People, including healthcare workers, died because of missing or inadequate PPE. The government put delivering contracts to its mates - via the "VIP Lane" - above delivering protection to frontline workers and patients.
The government actively encouraged the sort of health profiteering during a national emergency that was portrayed in The Third Man.
A number of Harry Limes have become extremely rich as a result.
Why wasn't this treated as a massive, defining national scandal?
"Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money?"
"Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax - the only way you can save money nowadays."
The issue is not that the BBC never covered the scandal - sometimes they did so, and well. But they came *extremely* late to the party, and even then, instead of giving it the daily headlines it required, reported it sporadically and way down the bulletins.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

28 Apr
This is such a fascinating paper. Since 1868, the population of Ethiopia has risen from 7m to 112m.
An environmental disaster? No.
In the study area, land degradation has DECREASED with population growth. More trees, more vegetation, less erosion. Why? sciencedirect.com/science/articl…🧵
Because the overriding issue, as some of us have been trying to point out for a while, is not population but *policy*.
In 1868, land tenure was feudal, and people and their livestock were driven onto steep slopes and into destructive forms of land use. But …
… since then, there's been land reform, giving people equal shares, followed by policies to exclude livestock from much of the land, replant trees, stop indiscriminate felling and protect soil. The result has been a major improvement in people’s livelihoods AND in land quality.
Read 8 tweets
26 Apr
This is not to downplay the horror of the Chernobyl disaster, but we now have powerful evidence that it didn't cause germline mutations in survivors' children. The rate was no higher than average even among the children of the heroic liquidators.
Thread/
science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
This is not surprising – it was the same for Hiroshima and Nagasaki: horrendous as the immediate and ongoing harms to survivors were, there were no detectable transgenerational effects.
nap.edu/catalog/11340/…
Children are born with disabilities all over the world. But in the regions close to Chernobyl, children with visible disabilities were sought out by journalists as if at a mediaevel circus. It was grossly unethical and unscientific.
Read 10 tweets
23 Apr
I've just spent a couple of hours at the local foodbank, meeting people who, in some cases, would literally starve without it. On the other side of the recreation ground, 200 metres and an entire world away, is a row of £3m homes.
England in microcosm.
Once again I'm reminded of who holds society together. It's the workers putting in unpaid overtime every week, and the team of volunteers, working their arses off to meet people's desperate needs, while the government rips up public services and hands our money to its chums.
For Johnson and his cabinet, government is just a big game. They can play King of the World for a while, dispense public largesse to their mates and make grand generalisations about the poor. But for the people at the bottom, and those working with them, it's deadly serious.
Read 4 tweets
22 Apr
Here's a small, cheap and simple #EarthDay proposal:
Beside every urban roadworks causing traffic delays, councils should erect signs saying "You'd get there quicker on a bicycle".
Every roadworks is an opportunity for change.
People should be constantly challenged to wonder why they're travelling through a city in a tonne of metal, when a vehicle you can lift with one hand is faster.
Or 2 tonnes in some cases. I would like to see every last one of these sent to be crushed. Image
Read 4 tweets
19 Apr
Mother of God. Starmer celebrates flying, then uses air travel as an example of how he wants to put recovery "above all else", presumably including the survival of life on Earth.
Where has he been these past few years?
He might as well just tell young voters to eff off.
In combination with Labour's rejection of proportional representation again today, it seems as if it's trying to burrow back into the 20th Century. Perhaps it feels safer there.
Then there are the optics. Starmer steps down from the plane like some visiting dignitary with a remind-me-which-country-this-is-again expression, meets some people in the airport then presumably flies out.
It might as well be an ad for Scottish independence.
Read 7 tweets
16 Apr
I clicked "Translate Tweet". It gave me:
"We hope that by planting a few trees we can greenwash our ecocidal business model and trip people into believing we're a force for good."
Incidentally, what in God's name are @Natures_Voice and @WoodlandTrust doing in partnership with this planetary death machine?
It's a classic example of how conservation groups, dazzled by corporate power and money, lose their moral compass.
Good spot by @andyheald
Which part of "greenwash" do these organisations not understand? And why should we continue to support them when they become a PR vehicle for fossil fuel companies?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!