(1) Here's something American liberals & moderate conservatives can do to help rebuild after the damage Trump did and is still doing, along with his allies and supporters.
Y'all need better #whistleblowerprotection, & you CAN create it without waiting years for law reform.
(2) This will be damn hard to achieve, I know. But I invite you to think about all those working in the public & private (eg media) sectors who can't report what they have seen, without leaving their family destitute during a pandemic that is still an existential threat to many.
(3) Most whistleblowers don't have the substantial personal resources that will get them through until they can one day make money again. Seditionists and other leaders of domestic terrorist networks know this. It's a key reason they get away with their crimes.
(4) Here's one example. In mid to late December 2020 it was abundantly clear that Trump was encouraging a mass gathering outside the Capitol for 1/6 that anyone with half a brain knew would likely turn violent.
Hundreds of federal workers & LEOs would have seen this, too.
(5) The Pentagon, under Trump, tried to claim afterward that slow-walking the national guard response on the day just sorta happened and we shouldn't read anything into that.
Absolute bullshit.
(6) I've studied, in detail, the timeline and evidence-supported facts of 1/6. I did that immediately, & more evidence has come out since.
Trump, his acting SecDef & the rest of the chain of command of not just the DoD but the DHS & DOJ had foreknowledge of the threat level.
(7) Yet all those LE/security professionals stood back while a fraction of the required USCP and MPDC personnel were sent out like lambs to the slaughter. Without proper PPE riot gear.
(8) There was even a sworn State Dept employee, Federico Klein, who tried to beat up LEOs, called others into the building, and was in jail awaiting trial. He might end up back there, many have.
No doubt there are other INSIDERS under investigation.
(9) Klein was apprehended after a State Dept employee recognized and reported him.
Do not underestimate the difficulty faced by whistleblowers. You are not in their shoes.
I'm suggesting groups be set up to offer them support.
(10) While we wait for slow law reform, marshalling private resources to offer potential whistleblowers a safer landing could be a substantial help in the overall movement to hold the domestic terrorists accountable, and one day restore a better political climate in the US.
(11) The Trump-majority of the GOP has plenty of money to support their ongoing insurgency, and escape accountability. They have established legal defense groups etc.
IMO this should be met with at least as much resource.
(12) I'm not saying offer cash to whistleblowers. But you could offer in-kind support eg legal support, and job offers from people who won't hate them for being a whistleblower.
If such groups already exist, let me know & I'll promote them.
(13) Potential whistleblowers may also need personal security, for them & their household. It costs money, & we can't assume state or federal law enforcement will do a good job of it. IMO it's better to procure it privately.
Those with money should put it where their mouth is.
(14) Winning the American War of Independence required a lot of resources: personnel, materiel, etc. A lot of the time the Continental army couldn't provide what was needed, so private individuals did.
I think what I'm suggesting can be done within the law, easily.
(15) The fact is, the Biden administration's homeland security agencies DHS, DoD, DOJ and more, are doing their best and are so far very effective. But they can't spend money that Congress hasn't given them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1) Jimmy Kimmel spent 18 mins last night with Mike Lindell on his show. I recommend watching it.
It provides an insight into how things got to the point of thousands storming the Capitol & why Trumpers still say it wasn't them & it wasn't that bad.
(2) True, there are some laughs to be had, & kudos to Kimmel for deftly enticing him to reveal things he shouldn't reveal. Comedy is more effective than rage.
Trump's inner circle includes anyone he thinks might be useful in some way. Then he ditches them. The list is long.
(3) Lindell is dumb as a rock. He's being sued for making claims like he made even in this interview. That's gotta lead to consequences in the proceedings.
Giuliani was just raided. Sidney Powell admitted she lied. Lin Wood's day is coming. They're all up to their necks in it.
And for the inevitable GENIUSES who will question why the use of a "restraint chair" inside a prison cell is wrong. There are several reasons but one of them is that the inmate can be injured or even killed this way, depending on his or her individual risk factors.
Ongoing physical mechanical restraint inside institutions like prisons and so-called "hospitals" can be very dangerous, which is why it is decreasingly used, in civilized places.
BRIEF restraint for immediate risk reduction is justified, but that is not what's alleged here.
(1) When I first heard that mRNA technology would be used in the Covid vaccines it gave me some pause. I then "did my research" and became satisfied that the tech itself was not a deal breaker for me.
I'm looking forward to getting the vax when it's available in my town.
(2) I don't support "mandatory vaccination."
I do support the use of incentives that encourage people to make an informed choice to get a Covid vaccine, including requiring people in certain occupations to get it. That's not "mandatory vaccination."
(3) I have several medical conditions that place me in the higher risk category. So, it was easy for me to weigh up the pros and cons.
I will do virtually anything to avoid hospitalization, for any reason. Because New Zealand government hospitals are unsafe for people like me.
I'm on Twitter to learn more about US history, current events, & theories behind political movements, esp. extremism & domestic terrorism.
To help me find my own tweets about it, I tag them #HWEdCamp. Here's why I chose that term.
(2) I'm not arrogant enough to think lots of folk will or should read my threads & tweets. A few years ago I had 17k Twitter followers, but that was only bc I had taken a side politically & tweeted what folk wanted to hear.
When you leave a club, you give up some stuff. >Shrug.
(3) So, think of these threads as me writing in my journal, in public. I want to bounce ideas off others, but not if we're just re-hashing the talking points of Democrats and Republicans. I can do that all day, having learned them when I was in each of the clubs.
(1) Thread: Russian & Chinese involvement in US politics.
When Democrat and Never Trump politicians, activists, and commentators claimed the Trump campaign had "colluded with" the government of Russia, that framing of the issue made their efforts less likely to succeed.
(2) Whether or not credible evidence of Trump-Russia collusion would ever be presented to the public, using this word in the investigation was a mistake. Trump & co needed only to persuade supporters that Trump had not actively taken up Russian offers of assistance.
(3) Because the claim of active Trump-Russia collusion was brought up in nearly every circumstance during the Trump term of office, his supporters switched off and turned the weapon around to point it at Democrats and Never Trump folk.
(2) Yes, the suspect appeared to hold a knife, while fighting with another girl. (The residence is a foster home and fighting had broken out.)
However, you can hear the same level of screaming/fighting noise after she is shot, so I wonder if other cops were covering that?
(3) Like, usually when people hear shots they stop and seek a place of safety. I want to know how many cops were there and if some were focusing on the other people still fighting. What if one of them turned a gun on the cops? They should have been ready for that possibility.