This is unfair, Chris. While it's true that SOME Democrats have understood and articulated the win/win opportunity innate to cleaner, cheaper energy it's been far from universal. And never so forcefully and consistently from the President in a SOTU speech.
In my professional and political experience, people have evaluated climate policy not by whether it is does what is necessary but by how close it gets to the limits of what conventional wisdom says is the limit of political possibility.
In other words, we elect people based on their stated capacity for leadership and then allow them to get away with saying "well, the voters just aren't there yet." That ain't leadership, and leaves climate policy constrained primarily by our collective ambition.
What was notable to me about Biden's speech as relates to climate was his commitment to tack into the wind. To push for what is necessary. To lead. I wish that wasn't exceptional. But it is, and we shouldn't suggest otherwise. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you ever feel like the thing you've been talking about for years is suddenly the thing everyone's talking about? that's me today seeing my in-box full of stories about the need to ease transmission siting if we are going to get to zero GHG electricity.
Today isn't a day for celebration. But it is a day for relief. A few thoughts...
1/ The systemic problems that make black and brown people more likely to get pulled over, more likely to get arrested, convicted - and yes, shot - don't end with Chauvin's conviction
2/ We need to pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, and so much more. Do not rest easy.
This is so important. When a country decides to politicize science, it loses the trust of those who don't believe the laws of physics to be negotiable.
We can build this back, but we have to build it back through our actions. Not just promises in Glasgow, but laws passed, regulations enforced. Give confidence to those who are watching our lips AND to those who are watching our feet.
I'm enormously encouraged by what the Biden administration is doing on both fronts. But we desperately need the @GOP to start engaging seriously, lest the rest of the world assume that our actions are only good so long as they are out of power.
Huge, but not surprising number: rapid electrification of US vehicle fleet could save drivers $2.7 trillion in fuel and maintenance costs by 2050. Clean energy = cheap energy. theguardian.com/us-news/2021/a…
Not surprising because a more efficient drive train uses less energy, so drivers spend less. And fewer moving parts = less maintenance expense. Huge because $2.7 trillion is a lot of money.
To be sure, falling battery and vehicle costs is great but insufficient. We need a lot more charging infrastructure to realize this opportunity, especially to ensure that folks who don't have private garages still have access to charging infrastructure.
This is sadly not a new thing. If we define terrorism as "threatened or actual violence by a non-state actor to achieve political ends", there is no close second to the KKK & their descendants when it comes to domestic terrorism. washingtonpost.com/investigations…
That definition by the way comes from University of Maryland who maintains a database of all domestic terror events that proves out that point. start.umd.edu/gtd/
One of the challenges crafting anti-domestic terrorism statutes is that to do so requires that we address our original sin and confront the too-close ties between government officials and racist vigilantes from reconstruction to today.
Some Monday morning thoughts on infrastructure, free markets and the appropriate role for the federal government. Thread:
1/ Inspired partially by some of the chatter amongst the more libertarian ends of my twitter feed suggesting that if free markets won't build infrastructure, the government shouldn't either. That fundamentally misunderstands infrastructure and capital markets.
2/ For the purposes of this thread (and Biden's infrastructure plan) let's define infrastructure as capital intensive stuff that makes commodities that people need. Telephone, rail, internet, electricity, highways and high volume mfg. Among others.