Huge, but not surprising number: rapid electrification of US vehicle fleet could save drivers $2.7 trillion in fuel and maintenance costs by 2050. Clean energy = cheap energy. theguardian.com/us-news/2021/a…
Not surprising because a more efficient drive train uses less energy, so drivers spend less. And fewer moving parts = less maintenance expense. Huge because $2.7 trillion is a lot of money.
To be sure, falling battery and vehicle costs is great but insufficient. We need a lot more charging infrastructure to realize this opportunity, especially to ensure that folks who don't have private garages still have access to charging infrastructure.
The White House #AmericanJobsPlan includes funding for 500,000 charging stations which is huge, but not enough - key will also be regulatory rule changes to attract private capital to further grow that charging infrastructure
Most notably, we need to ensure that the historic (often, state-level) laws that only allow regulated utilities to profit from retail-level sales don't preclude the ability of existing gas station, garage owners, etc. to use their existing assets.
But don't lose sight of that $2.7 trillion in savings. Spending money to save money is an investment. "How will we pay for this?" is the wrong question. "How much will we earn on our investment?" is the right one. Now let's go grab that opportunity. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is sadly not a new thing. If we define terrorism as "threatened or actual violence by a non-state actor to achieve political ends", there is no close second to the KKK & their descendants when it comes to domestic terrorism. washingtonpost.com/investigations…
That definition by the way comes from University of Maryland who maintains a database of all domestic terror events that proves out that point. start.umd.edu/gtd/
One of the challenges crafting anti-domestic terrorism statutes is that to do so requires that we address our original sin and confront the too-close ties between government officials and racist vigilantes from reconstruction to today.
Some Monday morning thoughts on infrastructure, free markets and the appropriate role for the federal government. Thread:
1/ Inspired partially by some of the chatter amongst the more libertarian ends of my twitter feed suggesting that if free markets won't build infrastructure, the government shouldn't either. That fundamentally misunderstands infrastructure and capital markets.
2/ For the purposes of this thread (and Biden's infrastructure plan) let's define infrastructure as capital intensive stuff that makes commodities that people need. Telephone, rail, internet, electricity, highways and high volume mfg. Among others.
This story about the challenges climate change is creating for coastal SC is a great distillation of why it's so important for our financial regulators to start treating climate change as a systemic risk. Brief thread: nytimes.com/2021/03/14/cli…
1/ First, this quote says everything you need to know about what happens if we stay on the course we are on.
2/ So here's a community where parts of beaches are shrinking by 14' a year, trying to figure out whether they are willing to raise the property taxes necessary to elevate the main road. That sisyphyean question is question is at the heart of system climate financial risk
Thanks for asking, friend! I'm happy to answer. First though, note that what we voted was simply to say that prisoners can vote. And as you know well, most prisoners are convicted of more trivial offenses.
1/ And as I'm sure you're well aware, our prison system massively over-incarcerates minorities, typically for low-level crimes that white men like me never get arrested for.
2/ Note this has nothing to do with whether or not people should do the time if they did the crime. It's simply saying that we cannot and should not use our prison system as a back-door to disenfranchisement.
We need to end the damned filibuster. And we need to stop pretending that a 50/50 division in a body that was designed to over-represent land at the expense of people reflects a divided US electorate.
Fact: The Senate, by design only represents 98.7% of the American electorate (because it excludes DC and the territories, which are represented in the House)
For comparison, WY, VT, AK, ND and SD represent fewer Americans than live in DC and the territories. And they get 10 votes (10% of the total!)
It's critically needed and the Senate must act now to get these resources into our economy to help struggling families and businesses, accelerate vaccine roll-out and safely reopen our schools.
A few important things:
1/ The single biggest line item in the bill is for direct, $1400 checks to people earning $75,000 or less ($150,000 for couples). $1400 per earner and each of their dependents.
2/ (If you earn more than these levels the amount of the payment scales down to zero at $100K/$200K), to ensure this is targeted to the neediest.)