You can watch proceedings (with a ten minute delay) at
(2)
First, the Inquiry checked if there were any questions for Jonathan Rosenhead. Mitting had a question for him – did he wish the Inquiry to act promptly about the miscarriage of justice that we heard about? Yes
(3)
Christabel then appeared on screen
Rebekah Hummerstone is leading the questions this afternoon too.
(4)
She said that the @ucpinquiry had noted Gurney's concerns about the wider investigations that needed to be made, but repeated this new assertion that this Inquiry had to limit itself just to the “Special Demonstration squad in its various incarnations”.
(5)
@ucpinquiry Christabel joined the Anti Apartheid Movement (AAM) and got a membership card. Membership was open, and people were encouraged to join the movement.
(6)
@ucpinquiry Her witness statement lays out the kind of tactics which the AAM used
The entire point of the AAM was primarily supporting people in South Africa who were struggling against the system
(7)
@ucpinquiry They focussed on the ways that British companies, banks and the Government supported the apartheid regime, and did what they could here to prevent that.
(8)
@ucpinquiry The AAM held many demonstrations and marches. These were agreed with the police in advance.
(9)
@ucpinquiry It details a group that walked from Brixton Hill to join a march (of around 3-4000 people) at Victoria Embankment. By the time it reached Trafalgar Square the crowd had doubled.
(11)
@ucpinquiry “Small contingents of anarchists, intent on trouble” and similar contingents of Maoists are mentioned in the report.
(12)
@ucpinquiry The AAM tried avoid anything which would distract the press from the real issue: the violence of the South African regime.
(13)
@ucpinquiry The next report was about the AAM's Annual General Meeting, held at the Liberal Club. ucpi.org.uk/publications/s…
It was not open to the press; it was for members only.
(14)
@ucpinquiry Christabel was elected to the National Committee. Among the names who held positions in the Aam were MPs (like Joan Lestor and David Steel) and other public figures.
(15)
@ucpinquiry She was asked if the AAM struggled with having too left-wing an image at the time? Christabel pointed out that the AAM enjoyed cross-party support, and was supported by many people with no party affiliation.
(16)
@ucpinquiry However the AAM was seen as being in opposition to British businesses (which worked in South Africa, and/or armed or funded the SA Government) and to official British Govt policy. (17)
@ucpinquiry She said that at the time the Cold War was in full swing, and the ANC was supported by the Soviet Union, and so some people thought the AAM was therefore sympathetic to the Soviet Union.
(18)
@ucpinquiry [UCPI 00000 08442] ucpi.org.uk/publications/s…
Ahmed Timol was arrested in South Africa and killed by the SA State.
He was a good friend of many of the exiles who had made their home in London, so they were extremely distressed about his death. (19)
@ucpinquiry They wanted to do “something more” than usual, explained Christabel. “These were exceptional circumstances”.
@ucpinquiry A sit-in (of South Africa House) was planned. The group fully expected to be roughed up by embassy security staff and knew there was a real possibility of arrest.
These security staff worked for the regime. They were known to be violent vs anti-apartheid campaigners.
(21)
@ucpinquiry According to this report [MPS-0737006 ], “the organisers are anxious that picketing should be peaceful so as to avoid adverse publicity”
@ucpinquiry Christabel agreed that this was the case with all AAM demos. They had found that the message of the demo tended to get lost when the media focussed on disorder. (23)
@ucpinquiryucpi.org.uk/publications/s… The AAM often held vigils, eg at South Africa House whenever people were due to be hanged by the regime.
They were quite small, solemn events, Christabel told us. (24)
@ucpinquiry The next report [MPS-0737656] concerned a fundraising Christmas dinner/ party held at her home. She says it was a purely social event, “there was absolutely nothing subversive in any way about it”. ucpi.org.uk/publications/s…
(25)
@ucpinquiry The AAM knew that they – like other groups trying to bring about change in society – were subject to police surveillance.
"I am surprised now at the extent of it” she says.
(26)
@ucpinquiry Christabel got involved with the Stop the Seventy Tour campaign.
This document mentions a meeting (attended by Doris Lessing and Ruth First among others) where Paul Hodges spoke about the group's plans to disrupt the Springboks rugby tour.
(27)
@ucpinquiry The AAM did not ally itself with the NVDA that was going on, or organise it.
However many individuals would have been involved with both campaign groups.
Gurney said there were some tensions, but both organisations were working towards the same aims, ultimately.
(28)
@ucpinquiry Her name is listed in the report as part of the “core of the coming protest movement” - would she agree with that? She said not really, she was very active in the Stop the Seventy Tour campaign but not at its core.
(29)
@ucpinquiry She did not attend the kind of special planning group meetings that we heard about this morning.
(30)
@ucpinquiry Christabel was also asked about the Dambusters Mobilising Committee, the campaign vs the Cahora Bassa Dam in Mozambique,. (31)
@ucpinquiry The DMC meetings were attended by various groups, including those with an interest in not just South Africa, but also Mozambique, Angola, Namibia etc
(32)
The #SpyCopsInquiry starts again this morning, hearing from Lord Peter Hain.
He was involved in campaigning against apartheid.
As his opening statement says:
"From the 1960s onwards, the international movement against the Apartheid regime in South Africa was one of the world’s largest social movements. Abhorrence at the racist and murderous regime was shared by people aroundthe globe."
(2)
"They formed campaigns in support of those in South Africa who were struggling for change and people in Britain played a central rolein campaigning for, and eventually achieving,that change"
(3)
[UCPI 00000 8660] ucpi.org.uk/publications/s…
STST's first national conference took place in March 1970. Both of today's witnesses are listed as attending it.
Jonathan pointed out that the speech reported on was given by Peter Hain, who was“by no means an extreme leftist”
(we'll hear from Peter Hain himself tomorrow)
The Stop the Seventy Tour campaigners felt that it was important to hold as many demonstrations as possible, at sports grounds all over the country...
The anti-apartheid activists would seek to disrupt matches and sometimes carried out pitch invasions.
(this picture is from Murrayfield in Edinburgh)
Jonathan talked about finally (“I tried several but I'm not very good at climbing fences”) getting on the pitch in Aldershot .
He pointed out that the police took photographs of them, which should have been destroyed when he and his co-arrestees were found not guilty of any charges, and made the point that the police should follow the law themselves.
Rosehead explained that they had originally targeted the South African cricket team, but then realised there was a planned rugby team tour as well, so expanded their activities.
He explained that -like the Committee of 100 in the 1960s – his group used Non-Violent Direct Action (NVDA)
“We had the same philosophy or actually in a sense offering ourselves up as a sacrifice to the law to demonstrate that there were things we thought were outrageous and this was one way we could do it”
"He said that it had been proved in the past specific organisations definitely had police spies among their members and attending their meetings"
"He added that everyone present should continually be checking up on each otherto ensure that each individual was a genuine revolutionary and not a police spy"
"He then said that any police spied found in revolutionary groups should, at least, get a 'good hiding' from the others"